journal article·2015-10

Surface Plasmon Resonance-Based Fiber Optic Methane Gas Sensor Utilizing Graphene-Carbon Nanotubes-Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Hybrid Nanocomposite

Satyendra K. Mishra, Sandeep N. Tripathi, Veena Choudhary, Banshi D. Gupta

Plasmonics· Volume 10· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Fabrication and characterization of a surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based fiber optic sensor using graphene-carbon nanotubes/poly(methyl methacrylate) (GCNT/PMMA) hybrid composites for the detection of methane gas have been carried out. Four kinds of probes with different over-layers on the silver-coated unclad core of the fiber have been fabricated to achieve the best performance of the sensor. The over-layers used are of reduced graphene oxide (rGO), carbon nanotubes (CNT), reduced graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes (GCNT), and GCNT/PMMA hybrid nanocomposite. The sensing ability of all the probes has been tested for the following gases: methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and nitrogen. The SPR spectra of all the probes for different concentrations of gases have been determined. A red shift in the resonance wavelength has been observed with increasing concentration of gases around the probes. Out of all the probes, the one with GCNT/PMMA hybrid nanocomposite over-layer has been found to be highly selective towards methane gas. For maximum sensitivity, the performance of the probe has been evaluated using different doping concentrations of GCNT in GCNT/PMMA nanocomposite. The doping concentration of 5 wt.% has been found to give maximum sensitivity of the sensor. Since the probe has been fabricated on optical fiber, apart from high selectivity and sensitivity, it has additional advantages such as miniaturized probe, low cost, capability of online monitoring and remote sensing, and immunity to electromagnetic field interference.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Avouris P, Xia F (2012) Graphene applications in electronics and photonics. MRS Bull 37:1225–123410.1557/mrs.2012.206 ↗
2. Tsai TH, Chiouand SC, Chen SM (2011) Efficiency enhancement with electro deposition Pt-Ru bimetallic nanoparticles and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) hybrid film as counter electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:12764–12773
3. Zhang K, Zhang LL, Zhao XS, Wu J (2010) Graphene/polyaniline nanofibers composite as super capacitor electrode. Chem Mater 22:1392–140110.1021/cm902876u ↗
4. Verma R, Gupta BD, Jha R (2011) Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance based biomolecules sensor using graphene and silicon layers. Sensors Act B 160:623–63110.1016/j.snb.2011.08.039 ↗
5. Ting SW, Periasamy AP, Chen SM, Saraswathi R (2011) Direct electrochemistry of catalase immobilized at electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified electrode for amperometric H2O2 biosensor. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:4438–445310.1016/S1452-3981(23)18340-4 ↗
6. Mani V, Periasamy AP, Chen SM (2012) Highly selective amperometric nitrite sensor based on chemically reduced graphene oxide modified electrode. Electrochem Commun 17:75–7810.1016/j.elecom.2012.02.009 ↗
7. Mishra SK, Tripathi SN, Choudhary V, Gupta BD (2014) SPR based fiber optic ammonia gas sensor utilizing nanocomposite film of PMMA/reduced graphene oxide prepared by in situ polymerization. Sensors Actuators B 199:190–20010.1016/j.snb.2014.03.109 ↗
8. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–66910.1126/science.1102896 ↗
9. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–5810.1038/354056a0 ↗
10. Lee C, Wei XD, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–38810.1126/science.1157996 ↗
11. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao WZ, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8:902–90710.1021/nl0731872 ↗
12. Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei EY (2008) Approaching ballistic transport in suspended graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 3:491–49510.1038/nnano.2008.199 ↗
13. Mani V, Chen SM, Lou BS (2013) Three dimensional graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes and graphene-carbon nanotubes hybrids. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:11641–1166010.1016/S1452-3981(23)13212-3 ↗
14. Sayago I, Terrado E, Lafuente E, Horrillo MC, Maser WK, Benito AM, Navarro R, Urriolabeitia EP, Martinez MT, Gutierrez J (2005) Hydrogen sensors based on carbon nanotubes thin films. Synthetic Mat 148:15–1910.1016/j.synthmet.2004.09.013 ↗
15. Star A, Joshi V, Skarupo S, Thomas D, Gabriel JCP (2006) Gas sensor array based on metal decorated carbon nanotube. J Phys Chem B 110:21014–2102010.1021/jp064371z ↗
16. Firouzi A, Sobri S, Yasin FM, Ahmadun FR (2011) Fabrication of gas sensors based on carbon nanotubes for CH4 and CO2 detection. Int Conf Nanotechnol Biosens IPCBEE 2:165–168
17. Roy RK, Chowdhury MP, Pal AK (2005) Room temperature sensor based on carbon nanotube and nanofiber for methane detection. Vacuum 77:223–22910.1016/j.vacuum.2004.08.023 ↗
18. Jorgenson RC, Yee SS (1993) A fiber optic chemical sensor based on surface plasmon resonance. Sensors Act B 12:213–22010.1016/0925-4005(93)80021-3 ↗
19. Jha R, Chand S, Gupta BD (2007) Fabrication and characterization of surface plasmon resonance based fiber optic sensor for the detection of pesticide. Sensors Act B 123:661–66610.1016/j.snb.2006.10.001 ↗
20. Shankaran DR, Gobi KV, Miura N (2007) Recent advancements in surface plasmon resonance immunosensors for detection of small molecules of biomedical, food and environmental interest. Sensors Act B 12:158–17710.1016/j.snb.2006.09.014 ↗
21. Chen CY, Chang CC, Yu C, Lin CW (2012) Diagnostic devices for isothermal nucleic acid amplification. Sensors 12:8319–833710.3390/s120608319 ↗
22. Scarano S, Mascini M, Turner APF (2010) Surface plasmon resonance imaging for affinity-based biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 25:957–96610.1016/j.bios.2009.08.039 ↗
23. Mishra SK, Kumari D, Gupta BD (2012) Surface plasmon resonance based fiber optic ammonia gas sensor using ITO and polyaniline. Sensors Act B 171–172:976–98310.1016/j.snb.2012.06.013 ↗
24. Singh S, Mishra SK, Gupta BD (2013) Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance based fibre optic refractive index sensor utilizing an additional layer of oxides. Sensors Act A 193:136–14010.1016/j.sna.2013.01.012 ↗
25. Tripathi SN, Saini P, Gupta D, Choudhary V (2013) Electrical and mechanical properties of PMMA/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites prepared via in situ polymerization. J Mater Sci 48:6223–623210.1007/s10853-013-7420-8 ↗
26. Wang J, Hu H, Wang X, Xu C, Zhang M, Shang X (2011) Preparation and mechanical and electrical properties of graphene nanosheets–poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites via in situ suspension polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 122:1866–187110.1002/app.34284 ↗
27. Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelets hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 74:221–22710.1016/j.compscitech.2012.11.015 ↗
28. Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K, Dai H (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–62510.1126/science.287.5453.622 ↗