Design and Optimization of Surface Plasmonic Sensor with Tunable Optical Actuation Angle Based on Microsystem Technology for Microfluidic Application
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Surface Plasmon resonance-based sensors are one of the most accurate detectors of chemical and biochemical components in microfluidic structures performed based on changes in the refractive index of the medium adjacent to the sensor surface. Precise adjustment of the excitation angle and occupation volume of one kinds of such sensors are among their highlighted challenges that come from conventional light coupling technique. In this paper, a novel idea for designing this type of sensor in microsystem technology is devised, which is capable of adjusting the angle of optical excitation using the thermal-optical effect while it has the minimum occupied volume. This design is optimized and validated using finite element method, so that the sensor performance in exchange for changes in parameters such as Refractive Index, metal Thickness, etc. is examined and displayed in the form of tables and graphs. Simulation results reveal that the proposed model is able to tune optical excitation angle such accurate that the SPR phenomenon occurs at an angle of 21.21˚at the outer boundary of 42 nm thick of gold layer at its best.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic and Optical Devices · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Sharma SC (2018) Surface plasmon resonance sensors: fundamental concepts, selected techniques, materials and applications. Advances in Sensors: Yurish S. Ed.; IFSA Publishing: Barcelona, Spain 5:25–77
2. Homola J, Yee SS, Gauglitz G (1999) Surface plasmon resonance sensors. Sens Actuators, B Chem 54(1–2):3–1510.1016/S0925-4005(98)00321-9 ↗
3. Sambles J, Bradbery G, Yang F (1991) Optical excitation of surface plasmons: an introduction. Contemp Phys 32(3):173–18310.1080/00107519108211048 ↗
4. Mudgal N et al (2020) Modeling of highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor for urine glucose detection. Opt Quant Electron 52:1–1410.1007/s11082-020-02427-0 ↗
5. Haque T, Rouf HK (2019) A performance improved Kretschmann configuration based surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor. in 2019 1st International Conference on Advances in Science, Engineering and Robotics Technology (ICASERT). IEEE10.1109/ICASERT.2019.8934489 ↗
6. Miyazaki CM, Shimizu FM, Ferreira M (2017) Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for sensors and biosensors. Nanocharacterization techniques. Elsevier, pp 183–20010.1016/B978-0-323-49778-7.00006-0 ↗
7. Roh S, Chung T, Lee B (2011) Overview of the characteristics of micro-and nano-structured surface plasmon resonance sensors. Sensors 11(2):1565–158810.3390/s110201565 ↗
8. Wang D-S, Fan S-K (2016) Microfluidic surface plasmon resonance sensors: from principles to point-of-care applications. Sensors 16(8):117510.3390/s16081175 ↗
9. Basak C, Hosain MK, Sazzad AA (2020) Design and simulation of a high sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor for detection of biomolecules. Sensing and Imaging 21(1):1–1910.1007/s11220-019-0267-6 ↗
10. Homola J, Piliarik M (2006) Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors. Surface plasmon resonance based sensors. Springer, pp 45–6710.1007/5346_014 ↗
11. Singh Y, Paswan MK, Raghuwanshi SK (2021) Sensitivity enhancement of SPR sensor with the black phosphorus and graphene with bi-layer of gold for chemical sensing. Plasmonics 1–1010.1007/s11468-020-01315-3 ↗
12. Mukhtar WM, Halim RM, Hassan H (2017) Optimization of SPR signals: monitoring the physical structures and refractive indices of prisms. in EPJ Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences10.1051/epjconf/201716201001 ↗
13. Akafzade H, Hozhabri N, Sharma S (2021) Highly sensitive plasmonic sensor fabricated with multilayer Ag/Si3N4/Au nanostructure for the detection of glucose in glucose/water solutions. Sens Actuators, A 317:11243010.1016/j.sna.2020.112430 ↗
14. Available from: https://www.refractiveindex.info
15. Johnson PB, Christy R-W (1972) Optical constants of the noble metals. Phys Rev B 6(12):437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗
16. Palmer C, Loewen EG (2005) Diffraction grating handbook.
17. Frey BJ, Leviton DB, Madison TJ (2006) Temperature-dependent refractive index of silicon and germanium. in Optomechanical technologies for Astronomy. International Society for Optics and Photonics.10.1117/12.672850 ↗
18. Cardona M, Paul W, Brooks H (1959) Dielectric constant of germanium and silicon as a function of volume. Harvard University, Gordon McKay Laboratory of Applied Science10.1016/0022-3697(59)90316-6 ↗
19. Alim N, Uddin MN (2018) Surface plasmon resonance biosensor in healthcare application using Kretschsmann & Otto configuration. AIUB J Science Eng (AJSE) 17(1):–1–610.53799/ajse.v17i1.1 ↗
20. Murat NF et al (2016) Optimization of gold thin films thicknesses in enhancing SPR response. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (ICSE). IEEE10.1109/SMELEC.2016.7573637 ↗
21. Pluchery O, Vayron R, Van K-M (2011) Laboratory experiments for exploring the surface plasmon resonance. Eur J Phys 32(2):58510.1088/0143-0807/32/2/028 ↗
22. Harvey JE, Pfisterer RN (2019) Understanding diffraction grating behavior: including conical diffraction and Rayleigh anomalies from transmission gratings. Opt Eng 58(8):08710510.1117/1.OE.58.8.087105 ↗