Ultimate mechanical properties of enstatite
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ultimate mechanical properties of MgSiO3 orthoenstatite (OEN), as characterized here by the ideal strengths, have been calculated under tensile and shear loadings using first-principles calculations. Both ideal tensile strength (ITS) and shear strength (ISS) are computed by applying homogeneous strain increments along high-symmetry directions ([100], [010], and [001]) and low index shear planes ((100), (010), and (001)) of the orthorhombic lattice. We show that the ultimate mechanical properties of OEN are highly anisotropic during tensile loading, with ITS ranging from 4.5 GPa along [001] to 8.7 GPa along [100], and quite isotropic during the shear loading with ISS ranging from 7.4 to 8.9 GPa. During tensile test along [100] and [001], a modified structure close to OEN has been found. This modified structure is more stable than OEN under stress (or strain). We have characterized its elastic and ultimate properties under tensile loading. With ITS ranging from 7.6 GPa along [010] to 25.6 GPa along [001], this modified structure appears to be very anisotropic with exceptional strength along [001].
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Brearley AJ, Jones RH (1998) Chondritic meteorites. In: Papike JJ (ed) Planetary materials reviews in mineralogy, vol 36. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Berlin, p C1
2. Cameron M, Papike JJ (1981) Structural and chemical variations in pyroxenes. Am Miner 66:1–50
3. Duffy TS, Vaughan MT (1988) Elasticity of enstatite and its relationship to crystal structure. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 93(B1):383–39110.1029/JB093iB01p00383 ↗
4. Frenkel J (1926) Zur Theorie der Elastizitätsgrenze und der Festigkeit kristallinischer Körper. Z Phys 37:572–60910.1007/BF01397292 ↗
5. Gouriet K, Carrez P, Cordier P (2019) Ultimate mechanical properties of forsterite. Minerals 9(12):78710.3390/min9120787 ↗
6. Hernandez J-A, Morard G, Guarguaglini M, Alonso-Mori R, Benuzzi-Mounaix A, Bolis R et al (2020) Direct observation of shock-induced disordering of enstatite below the melting temperature. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2020GL08888710.1029/2020GL088887 ↗
7. Jackson J, Sinogeikin SV, Bass JD (2007) Sound velocities and single-crystal elasticity of orthoenstatite to 1073 K at ambient pressure. Phys Earth Planet Int 161:1–1210.1016/j.pepi.2006.11.002 ↗
8. Jahn S (2008) High-pressure phase transitions in MgSiO3 orthoenstatite studied by atomistic computer simulations. Am Miner 93:528–53210.2138/am.2008.2710 ↗
9. Jiang C, Srinivasan SG (2013) Unexpected strain-stiffening in crystalline solids. Nature 496:339–34210.1038/nature12008 ↗
10. Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54(16):11169–1118610.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
11. Le Page Y (1987) Computer derivation of the symmetry elements implied in a structure description. J Appl Crystallogr 20:264–26910.1107/S0021889887086710 ↗
12. Li B, Kung J, Wei L, Liebermann R (2014) Phase transition and elasticity of enstatite under pressure from experiments and first-principles studies. Phys Earth Planet Int 228:63–7410.1016/j.pepi.2013.11.009 ↗
13. Misawa M, Shimoyo F (2020) First-principles study of pressure-induced amorphization of Fe2SiO4 fayalite. Phys Status Solidi B 257:200017310.1002/pssb.202000173 ↗
14. Monkhorst HJ, Pack JD (1976) Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 13(12):5188–519210.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
15. Ogata S, Li J, Hirosaki N, Shibutani Y, Yip S (2004) Ideal shear strain of metals and ceramics. Phys Rev B B70:104404
16. Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation-energy. Phys Rev B 45(23):13244–1324910.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
17. Periotto B, Balic-Zunic T, Nestola F, Katerinopoulou A, Angel R (2012) Re-investigation of the crystal structure of enstatite under high-pressure conditions. Am Miner 97:1741–174810.2138/am.2012.4157 ↗
18. Rietmeijer FJM (1998) Interplanetary dust particles. In: Papike JJ (ed) Planetary materials reviews in mineralogy, vol 36. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Berlin, p B1
19. Roundy D, Krenn CR, Cohen ML, Morris JW Jr (1999) Ideal shear strengths of fcc aluminum and copper. Phys Rev Lett 82:2713–271610.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2713 ↗
20. Spek AL (2020) CheckCIF validation ALERTS: what they mean and how to respond. Acta Crystallogr A E76:1–11
21. Sob M, Wang LG, Vitek V (1997) Theoretical tensile stress in tungsten single crystals by full-potential first-principles calculations. Mater Sci Eng A234–236:1075–107810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00329-8 ↗
22. Wang Y, Perdew JP (1991) Correlation hole of the spin-polarized electron gas, with exact small-wave-vector and high-density scaling. Phys Rev B 44(24):13298–1330710.1103/PhysRevB.44.13298 ↗
23. Wang J, Zhou Y, Lin ZL (2007) Mechanical properties and atomic deformation mechanism of γ-Y2Si2O7 from first-principles investigations. Acta Mater 55:6019–602610.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.010 ↗
24. Weidner DJ, Vaughan MT (1982) Elasticity of pyroxenes: effects of composition versus crystal structure. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 87(B11):9349–935310.1029/JB087iB11p09349 ↗
25. Zhang SH, Fu ZH, Zhang RF (2019) ADAIS: Automatic derivation of anisotropic ideal strength via high-throughput first-principles computations. Comput Phys Commun 238:244–25310.1016/j.cpc.2018.12.012 ↗