Metal–organic framework derived phosphide-hydroxide heterostructure as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for zinc–air batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Rational design and fabrication of high-efficiency electrocatalysts is essential for improving the kinetics of both oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), so as to constructing high-performance rechargeable zinc-air batteries (ZABs). Among the promising candidates, transition metal-based (oxy)hydroxides have attracted extensive attention for their considerable catalytic potential on oxygen-involved reaction, while unsatisfactory intermediate adsorption/desorption strength and low conductivity limit their practical feasibility. In this work, interface engineering modification strategy is proposed, and a metal–organic framework derived heterostructure catalyst of CoFeO xH y -CoP@CC is fabricated. Comprehensively analyses demonstrate that the interaction between phosphide-(oxy)hydroxide induces the interfacial electronic redistribution, while the formed Schottky heterostructure facilitates rapid electron transfer. All these kinetically favorable for both OER and ORR, and leads to remarkable bifunctional performance on CoFeO xH y -CoP@CC, with the OER overpotential of 240 mV to deliver the current density of 10 mA·cm −2, which is better than CoP@CC, CC and RuO 2. In practical applications, liquid zinc-air cells assembled by CoFeO xH y -CoP@CC deliver the peak power density up to 117.55 mW cm −2, which is close to that of 20% Pt/C catalyst (108.48 mW cm −2), and considerable operational performance has also been achieved in all solid-state flexible ZABs.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Yu · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33
2. Ji · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
3. Dong · Nano Mirco Lett. · 2022 · 14
4. Wang · Susmat · 2023 · 3 · 18010.1002/sus2.118 ↗
5. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2022 · 10 · 2179710.1039/D2TA05914B ↗
6. Lin · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 1804004
7. Xie · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32
8. Shi · Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. · 2020 · 59 · 2247010.1002/anie.202011097 ↗
9. Moradi · Electrochim. Acta · 2022 · 43610.1016/j.electacta.2022.141444 ↗
10. Li · Small · 2023 · 19
11. Li · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 14 · 5475810.1021/acsami.2c17112 ↗
12. Arafat · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 1110.1002/aenm.202100514 ↗
13. Yan · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 1558610.1039/D1TA03362J ↗
14. Liu · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2019 · 58 · 467910.1002/anie.201901409 ↗
15. Weng · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 143410.1021/acsenergylett.8b00584 ↗
16. Liu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2022 · 925
17. Cheng · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 1897710.1039/C7NR06859J ↗
18. Li · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30
19. Pan · Nano Energy · 2019 · 56 · 41110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.034 ↗
20. Li · Appl. Catal. B: Environ. · 2022 · 307
21. Wu · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 115310.1021/acsenergylett.1c00037 ↗
22. Lan · J. Alloy Compd. · 2023 · 94310.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169144 ↗
23. Wu · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3984110.1021/acsami.9b12221 ↗
24. Chen · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 9
25. Chai · Adv. Sci. · 2020 · 710.1002/advs.201903195 ↗
26. Xu · Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. · 2018 · 57 · 865410.1002/anie.201804673 ↗
27. Wang · Carbon · 2019 · 141 · 64310.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.023 ↗
28. Cheng · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 428
29. Zhang · Small · 2022 · 18
30. Bai · ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. · 2021 · 9 · 129710.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07700 ↗
31. Huang · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 180336710.1002/adma.201803367 ↗
32. Rui · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 2810.1002/adfm.201801554 ↗
33. Liang · Small · 2020 · 16
34. Liu · Electrochem Energy Rev. · 2022 · 5 · 11210.1007/s41918-021-00110-w ↗
35. Mu · Electrochem. Energy Rev. · 2022 · 5 · 14510.1007/s41918-021-00124-4 ↗