Molten salt assisted synthesis and structure characteristic for high conductivity fluorine doped Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7P3O12 solid electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
To address the safety concerns surrounding liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries, the development of a safe and reliable solid electrolyte with high ionic conductivity is of utmost importance. In recent years, the NASICON-type Li 1.3Al 0.3Ti 1.7(PO 4) 3 solid electrolyte has garnered increasing attention due to its impressive room temperature ionic conductivity and excellent chemical stability. However, its preparation is usually completed in high temperature up to 1000 ℃, which is high energy consumption. Herein, F-doped Li 1.3Al 0.3Ti 1.7P 3O 12 solid electrolytes were synthesized by molten salt assisted synthesis with AlF 3 as the precursor and flux, which were prepared at 800 ℃ with relative density of 95.39% and room temperature lithium ionic conductivity of 1.14 × 10 −3 S cm −1 . XRD results show that F doping can inhibit the formation of impurity phase LiTiPO 5 to a certain extent, and is beneficial to improve the conductivity and density of LATP solid electrolyte. FT-IR spectra show that the addition of F changes the structural peak of PO4 3- and increases the number of bridge oxygen, thus enhancing the structural stability of LATP solid electrolyte. The SEM results show that the addition of F can promote the growth of grain at low temperature, increase the density of LATP electrolyte, and reduce the energy consumption. EDS, XPS and TEM results show that F has been successfully doped into LATP solid electrolyte crystals.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage10.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
2. Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors10.1002/anie.201201429 ↗
3. E. Il’ina, S. Pershina, 2019. Composite Electrolytes Based on Tetragonal Li7La3Zr2O12 for Lithium Batteries, (2019) 167–193. 〈https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-030–31581-8_8〉.10.1007/978-3-030-31581-8_8 ↗
4. Z. Wu, Z. Xie, A. Yoshida, Z. Wang, X. Hao, A. Abudula, G.J.R. Guan, S.E. Reviews, 2019. Utmost limits of various solid electrolytes in all-solid-state lithium batteries: A critical review, 109 (2019) 367–385. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.035〉.10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.035 ↗
5. Progress and perspective of Li1+xAlxTi2‐x(PO4)3 ceramic electrolyte in lithium batteries10.1002/inf2.12222 ↗
6. X.M. Wu, X.H. Li, Y.H. Zhang, M.F. Xu, Z.Q. He, 2004. Synthesis of Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 by sol-gel technique, 58 (2004) 1227–1230. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2003.09.013〉.10.1016/j.matlet.2003.09.013 ↗
7. X.M. Wu, X.H. Li, S.W. Wang, Z. Wang, Y.H. Zhang, M.F. Xu, Z.Q. He, 2003. Preparation and characterization of lithium-ion-conductive Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 thin films by the solution deposition, 425 (2003) 103–107. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040–6090(02)01094–5〉.10.1016/S0040-6090(02)01094-5 ↗
8. Lithium diffusion pathway in Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) superionic conductor10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02821 ↗
9. J.B. Goodenough, H.-P. Hong, J. Kafalas, 1976. Fast Na+-ion transport in skeleton structures, 11 (1976) 203–220. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/0025–5408(76)90077–5〉.10.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-5 ↗
10. P.G. Bruce, A. West, 1983. The A-C conductivity of polycrystalline LISICON, Li2+2xZn1−xGeO4, and a model for intergranular constriction resistances, 130 (1983) 662. 〈https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2119778〉.10.1149/1.2119778 ↗
11. The synergistic effect of dual substitution of Al and Sb on structure and ionic conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12 ceramic10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.072 ↗
12. Effects of B2O3 on microstructure and ionic conductivity of Li6.5La3Zr1.5Nb0.5O12 solid electrolyte10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.035 ↗
13. Y. Inaguma, C. Liquan, M. Itoh, T. Nakamura, T. Uchida, H. Ikuta, M. Wakihara, 1993. High ionic conductivity in lithium lanthanum titanate, 86 (1993) 689–693. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/0038–1098(93)90841-A〉.10.1016/0038-1098(93)90841-A ↗
14. F. Mizuno, A. Hayashi, K. Tadanaga, M. Tatsumisago, 2005. New, highly ion‐conductive crystals precipitated from Li2S–P2S5 glasses, 17 (2005) 918–921. 〈https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200401286〉.10.1002/adma.200401286 ↗
15. X. Yu, J. Bates, G. Jellison, F. Hart, 1997. A stable thin‐film lithium electrolyte: lithium phosphorus oxynitride, 144 (1997) 524. 〈https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837443〉.10.1149/1.1837443 ↗
16. M. Schroeder, S. Glatthaar, J.R. Binder, 2011. Influence of spray granulation on the properties of wet chemically synthesized Li1.3Ti1.7Al0.3(PO4)3 (LATP) powders, 201 (2011) 49–53. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2011.08.014〉.10.1016/j.ssi.2011.08.014 ↗
17. H. Aono, E. Sugimoto, Y. Sadaoka, N. Imanaka, G..y. Adachi, 1990. Ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes based on lithium titanium phosphate, 137 (1990) 1023. 〈https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2086597〉.10.1149/1.2086597 ↗
18. Y. Kobayashi, T. Takeuchi, M. Tabuchi, K. Ado, H. Kageyama, 1999. Densification of LiTi2(PO4)3-based solid electrolytes by spark-plasma-sintering, 81 (1999) 853–858. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378–7753(99)00121–4〉.10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00121-4 ↗
19. C.R. Mariappan, M. Gellert, C. Yada, F. Rosciano, B. Roling, 2012. Grain boundary resistance of fast lithium ion conductors: comparison between a lithium-ion conductive Li-Al-Ti-P-O-type glass ceramic and a Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5P3O12 ceramic, 14 (2012) 25–28. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.022〉.10.1016/j.elecom.2011.10.022 ↗
20. Composite electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium batteries: low-temperature fabrication and conductivity enhancement10.1002/cssc.201700104 ↗
21. Isothermal crystallization and effect of soak time on phase evolution, microstructure and ionic conductivity of Li2O-Al2O3-TiO2-P2O5 glass-ceramic10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.02.016 ↗
22. Impact of sintering temperature on phase formation, microstructure, crystallinity and ionic conductivity of Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5(PO4)310.1016/j.ssi.2019.05.016 ↗
23. Evaluation of Li2O as an efficient sintering aid for gadolinia-doped ceria electrolyte for solid oxide fuel cells10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.010 ↗
24. C. Miao, Z. Kou, J. Li, C. Liu, Q. Chen, Y. Xiang, W. Xiao, 2022. LiF-doped Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 superionic conductors with enhanced ionic conductivity for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries, (2022) 1–11. 〈https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581–021-04324–2〉.10.1007/s11581-021-04324-2 ↗
25. Y. Kobayashi, M. Tabuchi, Os Nakamura, 1997. Ionic conductivity enhancement in LiTi2(PO4)3-based composite electrolyte by the addition of lithium nitrate, 68 (1997) 407–411. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378–7753(97)02520–2〉.10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02520-2 ↗
26. H. Aono, E. Sugimoto, Y. Sadaoka, N. Imanaka, G.-y. Adachi, 1991. Electrical property and sinterability of LiTi2(PO4)3 mixed with lithium salt (Li3PO4 or Li3BO3), 47 (1991) 257–264. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/0167–2738(91)90247–9〉.10.1016/0167-2738(91)90247-9 ↗
27. Influence of B2O3 addition on the ionic conductivity of Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 glass ceramics10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.137 ↗
28. Effect of lithium borate addition on the physical and electrochemical properties of the lithium ion conductor Li3.4Si0.4P0.6O410.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.002 ↗
29. H. Bai, J. Hu, X. Li, Y. Duan, F. Shao, T. Kozawa, M. Naito, J. Zhang, 2018. Influence of LiBO2 addition on the microstructure and lithium-ion conductivity of Li1+xAlxTi2−x(PO4)3 (x= 0.3) ceramic electrolyte, 44 (2018) 6558–6563. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.058〉.10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.048 ↗
30. Structural and electrical properties of ceramic Li-ion conductors based on Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3-LiF10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.08.032 ↗
31. W. Xu, C. Qin, S. Zhang, H. Liang, W. Lei, Z. Luo, A. Lu, 2021. Thermal, structural and electrical properties of fluorine-doped Li3.6Al0.8Ti4.0P7.6O30−x/2Fx (x= 0, 0.5, 1, 2) glass-ceramic electrolytes, 853 (2021) 157191. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157191〉.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157191 ↗
32. Insight into the mechanism of Li ion diffusion in fluorine-doped Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 as an electrolyte for solid lithium metal batteries10.1016/j.est.2023.108950 ↗
33. LiF-doped Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 superionic conductors with enhanced ionic conductivity for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries10.1007/s11581-021-04324-2 ↗
34. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package10.1107/S0021889813003531 ↗
35. Chlorine-doped Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 as an electrolyte for solid lithium metal batteries10.1039/D1QM00241D ↗
36. T. Hupfer, E. Bucharsky, K. Schell, M. Hoffmann, 2017. Influence of the secondary phase LiTiOPO4 on the properties of Li1+xAlxTi2−x(PO4)3 (x= 010.1016/j.ssi.2016.10.008 ↗
37. 0.3), 302 (2017) 49-53. 〈https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2016.10.008〉.10.1016/j.ssi.2016.10.008 ↗