Effects of cooling rate on borides morphology and structure in cast β-solidifying γ-TiAl alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Borides have been found to play a significant role in determining the mechanical properties of cast TiAl alloys. In order to investigate the influence of cooling rate on the morphology and structure of borides, SEM and HRTEM techniques were utilized to analyze borides in Ti-43Al-4 Nb-1Mo-0.5B (at%) cast plates with varying thicknesses. A higher cooling rate was observed to result in the formation of elongated, curvy borides with high aspect ratios, increased planar faults, and complex structures consisting of a combination of B2 phase and various boride phases. Conversely, a slower cooling rate yielded shorter bar-shaped borides with fewer planar faults. This variation in boride morphology can be attributed to the differing thicknesses of the solute-rich layer, where the eutectic reaction occurs, at the solidification front during fast and slow cooling processes. The B f -TiB with a habit plane of (010) was identified as the dominant phase at all cooling rates. Borides in the [100] and [001] directions demonstrated a faster growth rate compared to those in the [010] direction. Additionally, HRTEM results indicated the presence of TiB 2 while Ti 3B 4 was absent. This can be explained by the limited phase region of Ti 3B 4 in both the binary Ti-B and ternary Ti-Al-B phase diagrams, which is the smallest among all phases. These findings enhance the understanding of how cooling rate influences the morphology and structure of borides in TiAl alloys, thus providing insights for optimizing alloy design and manufacturing processes.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Genc · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2022 · 92910.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167262 ↗
2. Yang · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2015 · 51 · 129
3. Kim · JOM · 2018 · 70 · 55310.1007/s11837-018-2747-x ↗
4. Cheng · Intermetallics · 2000 · 8 · 2910.1016/S0966-9795(99)00063-1 ↗
5. Hu · Rare Met · 2016 · 35 · 110.1007/s12598-015-0615-1 ↗
6. Hu · Intermetallics · 2001 · 9 · 103710.1016/S0966-9795(01)00079-6 ↗
7. Hecht · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 96910.1016/j.intermet.2008.04.019 ↗
8. Witusiewicz · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2009 · 474 · 8610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.128 ↗
9. Abdel-Hamid · J. Cryst. Growth · 1985 · 71 · 74410.1016/0022-0248(85)90386-0 ↗
10. Graef · Acta Metal. Mater. · 1992 · 40 · 339510.1016/0956-7151(92)90053-H ↗
11. Kitkamthorn · Intermetallics · 2006 · 14 · 75910.1016/j.intermet.2005.11.013 ↗
12. Bernal · Metals · 2020 · 10 · 69810.3390/met10050698 ↗
13. Hu · Intermetallics · 2002 · 10 · 85110.1016/S0966-9795(02)00087-0 ↗
14. Cao · Mater. Charact. · 2023 · 20210.1016/j.matchar.2023.113056 ↗
15. Hu · Scr. Mater. · 2002 · 47 · 27310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00140-9 ↗
16. Cao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2023 · 88810.1016/j.msea.2023.145807 ↗
17. Li · Mater. Des. · 2020 · 195
18. Wang · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2020 · 56 · 78
19. Xu · Adv. Mat. Res · 2011 · 415–417 · 1121
20. Hyman · Metall. Mater. Trans. · 1991 · 22 · 164710.1007/BF02667377 ↗
21. Zhang · Intermetallics · 2021 · 138
22. Cao · Mater. Des. · 2022 · 224
23. Cao · Mater. Des. · 2023 · 23210.1016/j.matdes.2023.112122 ↗
24. Feng · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2006 · 6 · 162610.1021/cg050443k ↗
25. M.E. Hyman, PhD Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1991.
26. Murray · Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. · 1986 · 7 · 55010.1007/BF02869864 ↗
27. Smith · Can. J. Phys. · 1955 · 33 · 72310.1139/p55-089 ↗
28. Tiller · Acta Met. · 1953 · 1 · 42810.1016/0001-6160(53)90126-6 ↗