Compositional trends and magnetic excitations in binary and ternary Fe–Pd–X magnetic shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High throughput thin film experiments and first-principles calculations are combined in order to get insight into the relation between finite temperature transformation behavior and structural ground state properties of ternary Fe–Pd–X alloys. In particular, we consider the binding surface, i.e., the energy of the disordered alloy calculated along the Bain path between bcc and fcc which we model by a 108 atom supercell. We compare stoichiometric Fe 75 Pd 25 with ternary systems, where 4.6% of the Fe atoms were substituted by Cu and Mn, respectively. The computational trends are related to combinatorial experiments on thin film libraries for the systems Fe–Pd–Mn and Fe–Pd–Cu which reveal a systematic evolution of the martensitic start temperature with composition within the relevant concentration range for magnetic shape memory (MSM) applications. Our calculations include atomic relaxations, which were shown to be relevant for a correct description of the structural properties. Furthermore, we find that magnetic excitations can substantially alter the binding surface. The comparison of experimental and theoretical trends indicates that, both, compositional changes and magnetic excitations contribute significantly to the structural stability which may thus be tailored by specifically adding antiferromagnetic components.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Ullakko · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
2. Sozinov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 174610.1063/1.1458075 ↗
3. Matsui · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1980 · 48 · 216110.1143/JPSJ.48.2161 ↗
4. Muto · Metall. Trans. A · 1988 · 19 · 272310.1007/BF02645807 ↗
5. Cui · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 3510.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.024 ↗
6. Kakeshita · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2002 · 394-395 · 53110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.394-395.531 ↗
7. Fukuda · Mater. Trans. · 2004 · 45 · 18810.2320/matertrans.45.188 ↗
8. Kakeshita · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2006 · 438–440 · 1210.1016/j.msea.2006.02.193 ↗
9. Bechtold · Sens. Actuators A · 2010 · 158 · 22410.1016/j.sna.2010.01.009 ↗
10. Chernenko · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 265910.1103/PhysRevB.57.2659 ↗
11. Khovaylo · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 22440810.1103/PhysRevB.72.224408 ↗
12. Richard · Scripta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 179710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.033 ↗
13. Straka · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 745010.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.020 ↗
14. Khachaturyan · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 1083210.1103/PhysRevB.43.10832 ↗
15. Kaufmann · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 14570210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.145702 ↗
16. Kaufmann · New J. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 05302910.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053029 ↗
17. Kauffmann-Weiss · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 20610510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.206105 ↗
18. Sato · J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. · 1982 · 12 · 211710.1088/0305-4608/12/10/008 ↗
19. Zheludev · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1504510.1103/PhysRevB.54.15045 ↗
20. Hamann · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 594910.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.011 ↗
21. Kock · Intermetallics · 2010 · 18 · 87710.1016/j.intermet.2009.12.019 ↗
22. I. Kock, Phasenbildung, Phasenübergang und mechanische Eigenschaften des Funktionsmaterials Eisen-Palladium, Ph.D. thesis, Georg-August Universität Göttingen, 2010.
23. Inoue · Mater. Trans. · 2003 · 44 · 29810.2320/matertrans.44.298 ↗
24. Tsuchiya · Mater. Trans. · 2003 · 44 · 249910.2320/matertrans.44.2499 ↗
25. Vokoun · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2005 · 14 · S26110.1088/0964-1726/14/5/014 ↗
26. Hattrick-Simpers · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 254 · 73710.1016/j.apsusc.2007.07.104 ↗
27. Hamann · 2008 · 271
28. Jen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07B90210.1063/1.2830965 ↗
29. Sánchez-Alarcos · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 422410.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.020 ↗
30. Sánchez-Alarcos · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2010 · 635 · 10310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.635.103 ↗
31. Gruner · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 06410910.1103/PhysRevB.81.064109 ↗
32. Gruner · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 21441510.1103/PhysRevB.83.214415 ↗
33. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
34. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
35. Perdew · 1991
36. Perdew · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1653310.1103/PhysRevB.54.16533 ↗
37. Vosko · Can. J. Phys. · 1980 · 58 · 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
38. Ludwig · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 9910.3139/146.101746 ↗
39. Gruner · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2010 · 1200E
40. Opahle · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 07250810.1063/1.3086878 ↗
41. M.E. Gruner, P. Entel, J. Minár, S. Polesya, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater, (2012) doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.81, in press.
42. Yamamoto · Mater. Trans. · 2010 · 51 · 89610.2320/matertrans.M2009400 ↗
43. Liot · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 01420210.1103/PhysRevB.79.014202 ↗
44. Khmelevskyi · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 06451010.1103/PhysRevB.72.064510 ↗
45. Entel · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 870610.1103/PhysRevB.47.8706 ↗