Colossal dielectric behavior of (Nb, Ga) co-doped TiO2 single crystal
Source abstract
Abstract
(Nb 0.5Ga 0.5) xTi 1−xO 2 (x = 0.05%,0.2%,0.5%,1%,5%) single crystals were prepared by Verneuil method. Even if the doping amount is 0.05%, the dielectric permittivity (ε′) is obviously higher than that of pure rutile TiO 2 (260), reaching more than 10 4. As the doping amount x increase, the ε′ increases, and reaches the maximum value when x = 5%, but the dielectric loss increases correspondingly. The best dielectric performance (ε′=1.0 ×10 5, tanδ=0.034 under 1 kHz) is obtained when the doping amount is 0.5%. Even at 10 6 Hz, the dielectric loss is only 0.019, much lower than the reported ceramic samples. This may be due to the fact crystalline materials can effectively reduce defects such as grain boundary, second phase, porosity and segregation. The dielectric spectra, impedance analysis, XPS and DC bias results show that the colossal permittivity (CP) properties could be attributed to EPDD polarization. With the increase of doping concentration (>1%), the hopping polarization occurs, resulting in a slight increase in dielectric loss. These results indicate that TiO 2 crystal materials with lower dielectric loss are good candidates for dielectric materials. Taking TiO 2 crystal as the research object, we can have a clearer understanding of the origin of TiO 2 dielectric properties and the influence of doping ion content, which is of great significance to the development of TiO 2-based dielectric materials.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric properties of ceramics · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Optical response of high-dielectric-constant perovskite-related oxide10.1126/science.1061655 ↗
2. Colossal permittivity materials as superior dielectrics for diverse applications
3. The route to resource-efficient novel materials10.1038/nmat3180 ↗
4. A colossal dielectric constant of an amorphous TiO2:(Nb, In) film with low loss fabrication at room temperature10.1039/C4TC00500G ↗
5. Doping for superior dielectrics10.1038/nmat3744 ↗
6. Colossal permittivity in ultrafine grain size BaTiO3–x and Ba0.95La0.05TiO3–x materials10.1002/adma.200700245 ↗
7. Evidence of the internal domains for inducing the anomalously high dielectric constant of CaCu3Ti4O1210.1021/cm051180k ↗
8. Giant dielectric response and charge compensation of Li- and Co-doped NiO ceramics10.1016/j.mseb.2012.03.054 ↗
9. Giant dielectric permittivity observed in Pb-based perovskite ferroelectrics10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3404 ↗
10. High dielectric constant and frozen macroscopic polarization in dense nanocrystalline BaTiO3 ceramics10.1103/PhysRevB.73.064114 ↗
11. High Dielectric Constant in ACu3Ti4O12 and ACu3Ti3FeO12 Phases10.1006/jssc.2000.8703 ↗
12. Influence of Cr doping on structure and dielectric properties of LixCryNi1−x−yO ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.08.119 ↗
13. Dielectric relaxation in A2FeNbO6 (A=Ba, Sr, and Ca) perovskite ceramics10.1007/s10832-007-9353-6 ↗
14. Electron-pinned defect-dipoles for high-performance colossal permittivity materials10.1038/nmat3691 ↗
15. The dielectric properties for (Nb, In, B) co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.051 ↗
16. Effects of sintering temperature on microstructure and giant dielectric properties of (V+ Ta) co–doped TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.143 ↗
17. Surface barrier layer effect in (In+ Nb) co‐doped TiO2 ceramics: an alternative route to design low dielectric loss10.1111/jace.14688 ↗
18. Origin of colossal permittivity in (In1/2Nb1/2)TiO2 via broadband dielectric spectroscopy10.1039/C5CP02741A ↗
19. Direct view at colossal permittivity in donor-acceptor (Nb, In) co-doped rutile TiO210.1063/1.4962219 ↗
20. Colossal dielectric behavior of Ga+Nb co-doped rutile TiO210.1021/acsami.5b07467 ↗
21. Preparation, characterization, and giant dielectric permittivity of (Y3+ and Nb5+) co–doped TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.040 ↗
22. High-performance giant-dielectric properties of rutile TiO2 co-doped with acceptor-Sc3+ and donor-Nb5+ ions10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.333 ↗
23. Colossal dielectric permittivity in (Nb+Al) codoped rutile TiO2 ceramics: compositional gradient and local structure10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01351 ↗
24. Enhanced relative permittivity in niobium and europium co-doped TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.026 ↗
25. Very low dielectric loss and giant dielectric response with excellent temperature stability of Ga3+ and Ta5+ co-doped rutile-TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.037 ↗
26. Effect of Zn2+ and Nb5+ co-doping ions on giant dielectric properties of rutile-TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.093 ↗
27. Niobium and divalent‐modified titanium dioxide ceramics: colossal permittivity and composition design10.1111/jace.14850 ↗
28. Colossal permittivity of (Gd+ Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics induced by interface effects and defect cluster10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.012 ↗
29. Colossal permittivity Ti1–x(Eu0.5Ta0.5)xO2 ceramics with excellent thermal stability10.1021/acsaelm.0c00240 ↗
30. Large-size-mismatch co-dopants for colossal permittivity rutile TiO2 ceramics with temperature stability10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.12.018 ↗
31. Colossal permittivity and ultralow dielectric loss in (Nd0.5Ta0.5)xTi1−xO2 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.290 ↗
32. Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity in (Nb+Ga) Co-Doped TiO2 single crystals10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00611 ↗
33. Giant dielectric permittivity and electronic structure in (A3+,Nb5+) co-doped TiO2 (A= Al, Ga and In)10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.255 ↗
34. Giant dielectric permittivity observed in Li and Ti doped NiO10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.217601 ↗
35. CaCu3Ti4O12: one-step internal barrier layer capacitor10.1063/1.1463211 ↗
36. Nonlinear current-voltage and giant dielectric properties of Al3+ and Ta5+ co-doped TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.04.026 ↗
37. Effects of defect dipoles on the colossal permittivity of ambipolar co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics
38. Colossal permittivity of Sb and Ga co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.279 ↗
39. Influence of Zr dopant on polarization in rutile (In0.5Nb0.5)0.005(Ti1–xZrx)0.995O2 ceramics10.1111/jace.16892 ↗
40. Electronic structure of colossal permittivity (Mg1/3Nb2/3)0.05Ti0.95O2 ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.08.129 ↗
41. Colossal permittivity and low dielectric loss in niobium and europium co-doped TiO2 ceramics by adding B2O310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.093 ↗
42. Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity of rutile Ti0.9In0.05Nb0.05O2: single crystal and polycrystalline10.1038/srep21478 ↗
43. High dielectric performance and multifarious polarizations in (Lu+ Ta) co-doped TiO2 ceramics10.1080/21870764.2021.1966919 ↗
44. The effect of segregation structure on the colossal permittivity properties of (La0.5Nb0.5)xTi1−xO2 ceramics10.1039/C7TC05277D ↗
45. Colossal permittivity and impedance analysis of niobium and aluminum co-doped TiO2 ceramics10.1039/C6RA07746C ↗
46. Multifarious polarizations in high-performance colossal permittivity titanium dioxide ceramics10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.278 ↗
47. Ag+/W6+ co-doped TiO2 ceramic with colossal permittivity and low loss10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157350 ↗
48. Defects and dc electrical degradation in CaCu3Ti4O12 ceramics: Role of oxygen vacancy migration10.1063/1.4720151 ↗
49. Colossal dielectric permittivity in hydrogen-reduced rutile TiO2 crystals10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.044 ↗
50. Colossal permittivity in TiO2 co‐doped by donor Nb and isovalent Zr10.1111/jace.15196 ↗
51. Colossal permittivity of (Mg+ Nb) co-doped TiO2 ceramics with low dielectric loss10.1039/C7TC01020F ↗
52. Origin(s) of the apparent colossal permittivity in (In1/2Nb1/2)xTi1−xO2: clarification on the strongly induced Maxwell–Wagner polarization relaxation by DC bias10.1039/C6RA26728A ↗
53. Microstructure and dielectric properties of (Nb+In) co-doped rutile TiO2 ceramics