Potential‐induced optimization of ultra‐thin rear surface passivated CIGS solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells with an Al2O3 rear surface passivation layer between the rear contact and absorber layer frequently show a “roll-over” effect in the J–V curve, lowering the open circuit voltage (VOC), short circuit current (JSC) and fill factor (FF), similar to what is observed for Na-deficient devices. Since Al2O3 is a well-known barrier for Na, this behaviour can indeed be interpreted as due to lack of Na in the CIGS absorber layer. In this work, applying an electric field between the backside of the soda lime glass (SLG) substrate and the SLG/rear-contact interface is investi-gated as potential treatment for such Na-deficient rear surface passivated CIGS solar cells. First, an electrical field of +50 V is applied at 85 °C, which increases the Na concentration in the CIGS absorber layer and the CdS buffer layer as measured by glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES). Subsequently, the field polarity is reversed and part of the previously added Na is removed. This way, the J –V curve roll-over related to Na deficiency disappears and the VOC (+25 mV), JSC(+2.3 mA/cm2) and FF (+13.5% absolute) of the rear surface passivated CIGS solar cells are optimized. (© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ångström Solar Center University of Uppsala Uppsala 75121 Sweden
ESAT‐KU Leuven University of Leuven Leuven 3001 Belgium
Funding
European Commission · Swedish Science Foundation · Swedish Energy Agency
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat378910.1038/nmat3789 ↗
2. 10.1002/pssr.20140904010.1002/pssr.201409040 ↗
3. 10.1002/pssr.20130723810.1002/pssr.201307238 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.02510.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.025 ↗
5. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.228776910.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2287769 ↗
6. B.Vermang J. T.Wätjen V.Fjällström F.Rostvall M.Edoff R.Kotipalli F.Henry andD.Flandre Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. DOI: 10.1002/pip.2527 (2014).10.1002/pip.2527 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.36636510.1063/1.366365 ↗
8. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.222614410.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2226144 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr900056b10.1021/cr900056b ↗
10. 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.02410.1016/j.renene.2012.12.024 ↗
11. S.Pingel O.Frank M.Winkler S.Daryan T.Geipel H.Hoehne andJ.Berghold in: Proceedings 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Honolulu HI USA 2010 pp. 2817–2822.
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.225383310.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2253833 ↗
13. V.Fjällström P.Szaniawski B.Vermang P.Salomé F.Rostvall U.Zimmermann andM.Edoff IEEE J. Photovolt. submitted for publication.
14. B.Vermang J. T.Wätjen C.Frisk V.Fjällström F.Rostvall M.Edoff P.Salomé J.Borme N.Nicoara andS.Sadewasser IEEE J. Photovolt. to be published.