journal article·2025-07Open access

Impact of Eccentricity on the Performance of Nanotube Phase‐Change Memory Devices

Arvind Kumar Singh, Suresh Durai, Srinivasan Raj, Anbarasu Manivannan

Abstract

Phase‐change memory (PCM) has emerged as a promising nonvolatile memory candidate due to low power, high speed, and excellent scalability. However, imprecise fabrication processes make these nanoscale devices susceptible to process variation. The process variation can introduce deviations in the structural parameters and even lead to modification in the shape of cylindrical structures. In this aspect, eccentricity is the key parameter that quantifies the irregularity in the cylindrical‐based device structures. Herein, the eccentricity can significantly influence the thermal efficiency and RESET current (IRESET) of PCM devices. Hence, this study investigates the impact of eccentricity on the performance of low‐power nanotube PCM (NT‐PCM) devices using 3D TCAD simulations. The results reveal that eccentricity alters the NT‐PCM devices transitioning from circular to elliptical cross sections, strongly affecting the Ge2Sb2Te5/heater contact area and heat distribution. Among the three configurations (common eccentric [CE], confocal [CF], and concentric), CE and CF exhibit pronounced sensitivity, i.e., 83% increase in IRESET for CE and 75% increase in IRESET for CF configurations when eccentricity is 0.83. The results of this study suggest that eccentricity would play a crucial role in the modeling and simulation of the programming characteristics of cylindrical‐based PCM device architectures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Memory and Computing Research Centre Phase Change Memory Group Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai Tamil Nadu 600036 India

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Indian Institute of Information Technology Tiruchirappalli Tiruchirappalli Tamil Nadu 620012 India

TCAD and Nanoscale Device Laboratory Information Technology Department Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering Chennai Tamil Nadu 603110 India

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat459410.1038/nmat4594 ↗
2. G.Atwood S.DeBoer K.Prall L.Somerville inESSCIRC 2014‐40th European Solid State Circuits Conf. (ESSCIRC) IEEE Piscataway NJ2014.
3. J.Choe in2021 Int. Conf. Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD) IEEE Piscataway NJ2021.
4. S. A.McKee inProc. 1st Conf. on Computing Frontiers (CF'04) Association for Computing Machinery New York NY2004 p.162.10.1145/977091.977115 ↗
5. 10.1145/216585.21658810.1145/216585.216588 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41928-018-0092-210.1038/s41928-018-0092-2 ↗
7. 10.1147/rd.524.044910.1147/rd.524.0449 ↗
8. 10.1109/JETCAS.2016.254771810.1109/JETCAS.2016.2547718 ↗
9. 10.1080/23746149.2016.125958510.1080/23746149.2016.1259585 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41578-018-0076-x10.1038/s41578-018-0076-x ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab37b610.1088/1361-6463/ab37b6 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z10.1038/s41565-020-0655-z ↗
13. 10.1038/s41928-017-0006-810.1038/s41928-017-0006-8 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep0161910.1038/srep01619 ↗
15. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.207005010.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050 ↗
16. 10.1109/MSSC.2016.254619910.1109/MSSC.2016.2546199 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.293807610.1063/1.2938076 ↗
18. 10.1147/rd.524.046510.1147/rd.524.0465 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-981-13-8379-3_310.1007/978-981-13-8379-3_3 ↗
20. 10.1109/TIFS.2014.231574310.1109/TIFS.2014.2315743 ↗
21. 10.1002/advs.20220445310.1002/advs.202204453 ↗
22. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.205723010.1109/JPROC.2010.2057230 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-6641/ab721410.1088/1361-6641/ab7214 ↗
24. 10.1088/1402-4896/ac9dcd10.1088/1402-4896/ac9dcd ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat200910.1038/nmat2009 ↗
26. 10.1116/1.330157910.1116/1.3301579 ↗
27. A.Hubert E.Nowak K.Tachi V.Maffini‐Alvaro C.Vizioz C.Arvet J.‐P.Colonna J.‐M.Hartmann V.Loup L.Baud S.Pauliac V.Delaye C.Carabasse G.Molas G.Ghibaudo B.De Salvo O.Faynot T.Ernst in2009 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE Piscataway NJ2009.
28. S.Bangsaruntip G. M.Cohen A.Majumdar Y.Zhang S. U.Engelmann N. C. M.Fuller L. M.Gignac S.Mittal J. S.Newbury M.Guillorn T.Barwicz L.Sekaric M. M.Frank J. W.Sleight in2009 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE Piscataway NJ2009.
29. 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.04.01510.1016/j.spmi.2017.04.015 ↗
30. 10.1109/LED.2012.221530310.1109/LED.2012.2215303 ↗
31. 10.1109/LED.2011.215935810.1109/LED.2011.2159358 ↗
32. 10.1088/0268-1242/24/9/09501810.1088/0268-1242/24/9/095018 ↗
33. Sentaurus Device User Guide · 2016
34. 10.1063/1.293195110.1063/1.2931951 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mejo.2022.10563810.1016/j.mejo.2022.105638 ↗
36. B.Schmithusen P.Tikhomirov E.Lyumkis in2008 Int. Conf. Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices IEEE Piscataway NJ2008.
37. Kim D.‐H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 064512‐1
38. 10.1109/LED.2009.203513910.1109/LED.2009.2035139 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.328408410.1063/1.3284084 ↗
40. 10.1109/TCAD.2019.292750210.1109/TCAD.2019.2927502 ↗
41. 10.1109/LED.2008.200301210.1109/LED.2008.2003012 ↗
42. 10.1109/LED.2010.205883810.1109/LED.2010.2058838 ↗
43. 10.1109/TED.2015.246583510.1109/TED.2015.2465835 ↗
44. 10.1109/TED.2013.229630510.1109/TED.2013.2296305 ↗
45. 10.1109/TED.2022.321149510.1109/TED.2022.3211495 ↗