journal article·2023-11Open access

Influence of Fibroin Membrane Composition and Curing Parameters on the Performance of a Biodegradable Enzymatic Biosensor Manufactured from Silicon‐Free Carbon

Kevin A. Janus, Stefan Achtsnicht, Laura Tempel, Aleksander Drinic, Alexander Kopp, Michael Keusgen, Michael J. Schöning

physica status solidi (a)· Volume 220· Issue 22

Abstract

Herein, fibroin, polylactide (PLA), and carbon are investigated for their suitability as biocompatible and biodegradable materials for amperometric biosensors. For this purpose, screen‐printed carbon electrodes on the biodegradable substrates fibroin and PLA are modified with a glucose oxidase membrane and then encapsulated with the biocompatible material Ecoflex. The influence of different curing parameters of the carbon electrodes on the resulting biosensor characteristics is studied. The morphology of the electrodes is investigated by scanning electron microscopy, and the biosensor performance is examined by amperometric measurements of glucose (0.5–10 mM) in phosphate buffer solution, pH 7.4, at an applied potential of 1.2 V versus a Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Instead of Ecoflex, fibroin, PLA, and wound adhesive are tested as alternative encapsulation compounds: a series of swelling tests with different fibroin compositions, PLA, and Ecoflex has been performed before characterizing the most promising candidates by chronoamperometry. Therefore, the carbon electrodes are completely covered with the particular encapsulation material. Chronoamperometric measurements with H2O2 concentrations between 0.5 and 10 mM enable studying the leakage current behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Nano- and Biotechnologies (INB) FH Aachen Campus Jülich 52428 Jülich Germany

Institute for Pharmaceutical Chemistry Philipps University of Marburg 35032 Marburg Germany

Fibrothelium GmbH 52068 Aachen Germany

Institute of Biological Information Processing (IBI-3) Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52425 Jülich Germany

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0085910.1021/acsabm.0c00859 ↗
2. 10.1002/aisy.20190004010.1002/aisy.201900040 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cossms.2020.10080610.1016/j.cossms.2020.100806 ↗
4. Nouira W. · Sens. Lett. · 2022 · 7 · 113728
5. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.11372810.1016/j.bios.2021.113728 ↗
6. 10.20964/2022.01.2710.20964/2022.01.27 ↗
7. Mahadeva S. K. · Proc. SPIE · 2011 · 7980 · 114
8. 10.1021/ac902260510.1021/ac9022605 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.11320410.1016/j.bios.2021.113204 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.08.00410.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.08.004 ↗
11. 10.3390/bios201007010.3390/bios2010070 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.05710.1016/j.msec.2019.01.057 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.00810.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.008 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-022-07379-210.1007/s10853-022-07379-2 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0101710.1021/acsaelm.0c01017 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.a.3631410.1002/jbm.a.36314 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.12325510.1016/j.talanta.2022.123255 ↗
18. 10.3390/ijms1902040710.3390/ijms19020407 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.04910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.049 ↗
20. Ren K. · J. Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 5704
21. 10.1002/mds3.1014910.1002/mds3.10149 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.033 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20210976410.1002/adma.202109764 ↗
24. Lee C. · Adv. Sustainable Syst. · 2022 · 6 · 20002116
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.04310.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.043 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41378-021-00261-210.1038/s41378-021-00261-2 ↗
27. 10.1007/s42765-022-00150-x10.1007/s42765-022-00150-x ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.10029010.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100290 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.10658510.1016/j.microc.2021.106585 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.140774311110.1073/pnas.1407743111 ↗
31. 10.1002/aelm.20210084310.1002/aelm.202100843 ↗
32. Ratanasongtham P. · Chiang Mai J. Sci. · 2017 · 44 · 1431
33. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.12310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.123 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat274510.1038/nmat2745 ↗
35. 10.1038/ncomms176710.1038/ncomms1767 ↗
36. 10.1002/adma.20110381410.1002/adma.201103814 ↗
37. 10.1002/pssa.20220010010.1002/pssa.202200100 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.12626510.1016/j.biortech.2021.126265 ↗
39. 10.1002/pssa.20143191310.1002/pssa.201431913 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00162-410.1016/S0045-6535(00)00162-4 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1104065110.3390/polym11040651 ↗
42. 10.1088/2057-1976/abfd8210.1088/2057-1976/abfd82 ↗
43. 10.1021/bm101422j10.1021/bm101422j ↗
44. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.10984210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109842 ↗
45. 10.3389/fchem.2020.58507710.3389/fchem.2020.585077 ↗
46. 10.1080/10717544.2020.173620810.1080/10717544.2020.1736208 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10310910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103109 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0123310.1021/acs.biomac.8b01233 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0172110.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01721 ↗
50. Immergut E. H. · 1965