Ultra‐Low Power Multilevel Switching with Enhanced Uniformity in Forming Free TiO2−x‐Based RRAM with Embedded Pt Nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate control over the various resistance states is highly desired in order to attain reliable multilevel memory performance. However, due to the inherent random nature of oxygen vacancy creation, serious variability issues may arise. In this work, we demonstrate promising multilevel capability with ultra‐low power consumption in the range of nW, using sub‐200 nA operating current in a 45 nm TiO2−x‐based resistive random access memory (RRAM) with embedded small (≈5 nm in diameter) Pt nanocrystals (NCs). As the resistance values present a strong dependence on both the oxygen vacancy density and the diameter of the conducting filament (CF), hence the degree of the variability (or uniformity) can be improved by controlling one of these two parameters. It is shown here that the presence of NCs allows for the generation of multiple and dense CFs due to the concentrated electric field around the NCs which, in turn, enhance the consecutive cycling (temporal) uniformity, even at very low operating power conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics National Technical University of Athens Iroon Polytechniou 9 15780 Athens Greece
Funding
State Scholarships Foundation
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.243331110.1109/JPROC.2015.2433311 ↗
2. 10.1147/rd.524.043910.1147/rd.524.0439 ↗
3. B.Govoreanu G. S.Kar Y.‐Y.Chen V.Paraschiv S.Kubicek A.Fantini I. P.Radu L.Goux S.Clima R.Degraeve N.Jossart O.Richard T.Vandeweyer K.Seo P.Hendrickx G.Pourtois H.Bender L.Altimime D. J.Wouters J. A.Kittl M.Jurczak in: Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2011 IEEE International Washington DC USA 2011 31.6.1.10.1109/IEDM.2011.6131652 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep2102010.1038/srep21020 ↗
5. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/6/06300210.1088/0268-1242/31/6/063002 ↗
6. Kim W. · IEEE Electron Device Lett · 2016 · 37 · 32
7. 10.1109/LED.2014.237520010.1109/LED.2014.2375200 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4NR00500G10.1039/C4NR00500G ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20150275810.1002/adma.201502758 ↗
10. 10.1109/LED.2016.253094210.1109/LED.2016.2530942 ↗
11. 10.1109/TED.2014.233020010.1109/TED.2014.2330200 ↗
12. 10.1109/LED.2016.257027910.1109/LED.2016.2570279 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20120457210.1002/adma.201204572 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.319365610.1063/1.3193656 ↗
15. 10.1109/LED.2011.212577410.1109/LED.2011.2125774 ↗
16. 10.1109/LED.2016.257506510.1109/LED.2016.2575065 ↗
17. P.Bousoulas D.Sakellaropoulos J.Giannopoulos D.Tsoukalas in: Solid State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC) 2015 45th European Graz Austria 2015.
18. 10.1049/el.2015.114510.1049/el.2015.1145 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00339-013-7776-210.1007/s00339-013-7776-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.15910.1016/j.snb.2017.06.159 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp200143y10.1021/jp200143y ↗
22. Bousoulas P. · J. Appl. Phys · 2017 · 39 · 887
23. 10.1021/acsami.6b0491910.1021/acsami.6b04919 ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2015.22110.1038/nnano.2015.221 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.492244610.1063/1.4922446 ↗
26. 10.1021/nn405827t10.1021/nn405827t ↗
27. 10.1063/1.368522210.1063/1.3685222 ↗