The effect of surface termination on glucose oxidation using Ni‐modified diamond electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Abstractauthoren This study describes the decoration of hydrogen‐ and oxygen‐terminated boron‐doped diamond electrodes (BDD) with three different loadings of Ni. The Ni was deposited electrochemically for 600, 400, and 100 s on both hydrogen‐terminated BDD (BDDH) and oxygen‐terminated BDD (BDDO). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that all Ni particles were roughly spherical in shape, but distribution and size varied with electrode termination: a uniform coverage with a particle size dependent on deposition duration was achieved on BDDH, but on BDDO the particles are deposited primarily along surface ridges and had similar sizes for all three deposition times. The performance of the samples was then tested using glucose sensing as an exemplar application. It was found that glucose oxidation varies greatly between electrodes at concentrations similar to those found in human blood. The variability between the samples was attributed to surface differences between electrodes and the difference in particle location. Amperometry using BDDs decorated with the 100 s Ni deposition gave a stable current response with respect to glucose concentration in the range 0.1–13 mM with much higher glucose oxidation currents being observed for the Ni nanoparticles deposited on the hydrogenated diamond surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TA UK
Department of Materials Imperial College London Exhibition Road, London, SW7 2BP UK
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/elan.20030283010.1002/elan.200302830 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0925-9635(99)00234-410.1016/S0925-9635(99)00234-4 ↗
3. 10.1039/C3RA43763A10.1039/C3RA43763A ↗
4. 10.1002/pssa.20120004910.1002/pssa.201200049 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr068076m10.1021/cr068076m ↗
6. Toghill K. E. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2010 · 5 · 124610.1016/S1452-3981(23)15359-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.01.03410.1016/j.jelechem.2011.01.034 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)17080-510.1016/S1452-3981(23)17080-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00260-710.1016/S0925-9635(03)00260-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.12.03910.1016/j.electacta.2005.12.039 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.36429910.1063/1.364299 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.02310.1016/j.electacta.2005.04.023 ↗
13. Tryk A. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1998 · 146 · 1081
14. 10.1149/1.183856910.1149/1.1838569 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0167-5729(97)80002-710.1016/S0167-5729(97)80002-7 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.10169410.1063/1.101694 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.115131410.1126/science.1151314 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.347210.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3472 ↗
19. L.Ley Surface Conductivity of Diamond in: CVD Diamond for Electronic Devices and Sensors edited by R. S. Sussmann (John Wiley & Sons Chichester (2009)) chap. 4.10.1002/9780470740392.ch4 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00216-005-0230-310.1007/s00216-005-0230-3 ↗
21. 10.1002/pssa.20098222610.1002/pssa.200982226 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.03.00710.1016/j.elecom.2012.03.007 ↗
23. 10.1021/cr030063a10.1021/cr030063a ↗
24. 10.1002/elan.20100007210.1002/elan.201000072 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2010.03.09110.1016/j.snb.2010.03.091 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp109526b10.1021/jp109526b ↗
27. 10.1002/elan.20090052310.1002/elan.200900523 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80425-X10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80425-X ↗
29. 10.1002/elan.20090032510.1002/elan.200900325 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)02919-910.1016/0022-0728(93)02919-9 ↗
31. 10.1002/elan.20100065810.1002/elan.201000658 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0022-0728(71)80040-210.1016/S0022-0728(71)80040-2 ↗
33. 10.1002/elan.20140036110.1002/elan.201400361 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.12.01910.1016/j.jelechem.2008.12.019 ↗
35. I. V.Shpilevaya Surface Characterisation and Functional Properties of Modified Diamond Electrodes Ph.D. thesis University of Oxford Oxford UK 2014.
36. 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.05.00910.1016/j.elecom.2005.05.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.08.01310.1016/j.talanta.2006.08.013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.08.04010.1016/j.bios.2008.08.040 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.08510.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.085 ↗
40. 10.1016/0013-4686(80)87072-110.1016/0013-4686(80)87072-1 ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0093734510.1007/BF00937345 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.06.06310.1016/j.foodchem.2007.06.063 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.03110.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.03.031 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.09.01310.1016/j.matlet.2006.09.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.00510.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.005 ↗