A study of the physical properties and gas‐sensing performance of TiO2 nanofilms: Automated nebulizer spray pyrolysis method (ANSP)
Source abstract
Abstract
Automated nebulizer‐sprayed TiO2 nanofilms were deposited on the glass substrate by using different temperature (300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 °C). The effect of temperature on the structural study by XRD and AFM reveals that the amorphous nature turns to stabilized anatase tetragonal phase with an enhancement of the preferred orientation (101), particle size, average roughness of the topographical view and thickness (238, 279, 304, 362, and 397 nm) of the coated films. The morphological study by the FESEM method shows a crack and a void free micro grain particle due to the effect of temperature. An optical study shows that the transmittances of all the samples gradually decreased and the redshift of the absorption edges with decreased bandgap (3.67–3.35 eV) value is observed by the influence of temperature. The n‐type semiconducting nature of TiO2 nanofilms shows the voltage drop across the sensor element on exposure to the reducing gas. Among the various gases (CH4O, C3H8O, NH3, C3H6O) the reducing gas C2H6O exhibits a better response for a 500 °C coating temperature at an optimal operating temperature of 300 °C with 150 ppm gas concentration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Government Arts College Coimbatore 641018 India
Department of Physics Sree Sakthi Engineering College Coimbatore 641104 India
Department of ECE Sree Sakthi Engineering College Coimbatore 641104 India
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.04.02210.1016/j.materresbull.2004.04.022 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20058.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.1999.tb20058.x ↗
3. 10.1038/srep3235510.1038/srep32355 ↗
4. Vaiciulis I. · Proc. Rom. Acad. Seri. A · 2012 · 13 · 335
5. 10.1063/1.34285610.1063/1.342856 ↗
6. 10.1016/0925-4005(94)01559-Z10.1016/0925-4005(94)01559-Z ↗
7. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.10.01610.1016/j.snb.2007.10.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.24310.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.243 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.05710.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.057 ↗
10. 10.1002/jctb.222010.1002/jctb.2220 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.09.03210.1016/j.ijleo.2016.09.032 ↗
12. Gopala Krishnan V. · Mater. Res. Express · 2017 · 4 · 1
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.03010.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.030 ↗
14. Cullity B. D. · 1978
15. 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00569-510.1016/S0169-4332(03)00569-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01542-X10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01542-X ↗
17. Ayouchi R. · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2010 · 7 · 93310.1002/pssc.200982895 ↗
18. 10.1002/chem.20050102010.1002/chem.200501020 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00331-610.1016/S0169-4332(98)00331-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.00110.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.12.00110.1016/j.jpcs.2008.12.001 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10971-011-2525-510.1007/s10971-011-2525-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00422-910.1016/S0022-0248(98)00422-9 ↗
24. Ganesan N. M. · Int. J. ChemTech Res · 2014 · 6 · 3078
25. 10.1080/1478643700822106110.1080/14786437008221061 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.00710.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.007 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.176959810.1063/1.1769598 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0921-5107(99)00144-010.1016/S0921-5107(99)00144-0 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.03010.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.030 ↗
30. Zakrzewska K. · 2003
31. 10.1016/j.mseb.2007.04.01110.1016/j.mseb.2007.04.011 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)01031-010.1016/S0925-4005(01)01031-0 ↗
33. Shukla S. · 2003
34. 10.1366/000370287444784210.1366/0003702874447842 ↗