The Role of Interface Vibrational Modes in Thermal Boundary Resistance
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding how heat flows across interfaces is vital to energy efficiency and thermal stability of many electrical devices. However, the thermal resistance caused by the interface between two materials, termed Kapitza resistance, remains poorly understood. To that end, several first‐principles molecular dynamic simulations and a detailed analysis of the phonon processes and associated transfer of heat at the interfaces of both c‐Si|a‐SiO2 and c‐Si|c‐Ge are presented. It is found that in both cases the interface properties are very important. In the case of c‐Si|a‐SiO2, it is found that interface modes cause inelastic phonon interactions and play a significant role in the total energy transferred. In the case of c‐Si|a‐SiO2, one is able to quantify this effect and find that there is a small set of interface modes which carry >10% of the heat, and decrease the ultimate thermal boundary resistance by 26.5%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
RB Annis School of Engineering University of Indianapolis Indianapolis IN 46227 USA
School of Health Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette IN 47907 USA
Department of Physics Texas Tech University Lubbock TX 79409 USA
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.483261510.1063/1.4832615 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20190385710.1002/adfm.201903857 ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03171910.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031719 ↗
4. 10.1109/JPROC.2010.207005010.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.152430510.1063/1.1524305 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12274-010-1019-z10.1007/s12274-010-1019-z ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.16610.1038/nphoton.2007.166 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-017-1728-810.1007/s10853-017-1728-8 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.508532810.1063/1.5085328 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep2313910.1038/srep23139 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.497357310.1063/1.4973573 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep3767510.1038/srep37675 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep3215010.1038/srep32150 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.492945210.1063/1.4929452 ↗
15. C. M.Stanley Ph.D. Dissertation Texas Tech University 2018.
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.20542310.1103/PhysRevB.95.205423 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0283710.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02837 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11664-013-2511-510.1007/s11664-013-2511-5 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.302706010.1063/1.3027060 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.311738710.1149/1.3117387 ↗
21. 10.1002/pssa.20180042810.1002/pssa.201800428 ↗
22. Gale J. D. · 2011 · 45
23. Ford M. J. · 2011 · 370
24. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/6/06420810.1088/0953-8984/20/6/064208 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.07544110.1103/PhysRevB.79.075441 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.20510110.1103/PhysRevB.66.205101 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
30. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab715710.1088/2053-1591/ab7157 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.19531310.1103/PhysRevB.91.195313 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.495368310.1063/1.4953683 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.16530410.1103/PhysRevB.80.165304 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.19530210.1103/PhysRevB.85.195302 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.491697410.1063/1.4916974 ↗