Tunable Magnetocaloric Performance of Cluster Microfibers Induced by Magnetization Direction
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, the work describes a comparative study of the magnetocaloric performance along different magnetization directions of cluster Gd‐based fibers for potential applications. Experimental results indicate that there exists the relatively obvious difference of magnetocaloric effect (MCE) in both longitudinal and transverse magnetization directions. Moreover, the isothermal magnetic entropy changes −ΔSm of 10.62 J kg−1 K−1 and refrigerant capacity (RC) of 756.37 J kg−1 of cluster fibers in transverse direction exhibit a higher value than those in longitudinal direction at relatively high field. This distinction depends on magnetic coupling (magnetic charges induced by electron spin‐orbit polarization) among cluster fibers and magnetic anisotropy (namely magnetic moment rotation) by the action of high magnetic field energy. Therefore, the cluster fibers by changing magnetization direction can provide an effective MCE modulation or to be a candidate for practical magnetic refrigeration applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology No. 49 Aimin Street 010051 Hohhot China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University No. 38 Zheda Road 310027 Hangzhou China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology No. 92 West Dazhi Street 150001 Harbin China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.12.02610.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.12.026 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.38710.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.387 ↗
3. Phan M. H. · 2007 · 43
4. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-10035610.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100356 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.02510.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.025 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.13710.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.137 ↗
7. Yuan F. · J. Appl. Phys · 2012 · 111 · 102407
8. Vaskovskiy V. O. · J. Alloys Compd · 1999 · 285 · 23810.1016/S0925-8388(98)01032-9 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.475103810.1063/1.4751038 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.07.02410.1016/j.jmmm.2014.07.024 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.05310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.053 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.449410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4494 ↗
13. Tegus O. · Nature · 2002 · 15 · 15010.1038/415150a ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.12710.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.127 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.114210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1142 ↗
16. Fujita A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 552
17. 10.1063/1.36100710.1063/1.361007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.00610.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.006 ↗
19. Liu J. S. · J. Alloys Compd · 2017 · 711 · 7110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.363 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.32317610.1063/1.323176 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.37339310.1063/1.373393 ↗
22. Camley R. E. · Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 35 · 360810.1103/PhysRevB.35.3608 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.08510.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.085 ↗
24. Liao C. B. · IEEE Trans. Magn · 2014 · 50 · 8401904
25. Ju H. L. · Acta Phys. Sin · 2015 · 64 · 09750110.7498/aps.64.097501 ↗
26. 10.1016/0304-8853(92)91172-P10.1016/0304-8853(92)91172-P ↗
27. Jiao F. S. · IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond · 2012 · 22 · 490300510.1109/TASC.2011.2179694 ↗
28. 10.1109/20.33422610.1109/20.334226 ↗
29. 10.1109/20.36481210.1109/20.364812 ↗
30. 10.1002/pssa.20030679110.1002/pssa.200306791 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.12.01910.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.12.019 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.33304610.1063/1.333046 ↗
33. Stöhr J. · 2006 · 60
34. 10.1002/pssa.20112753810.1002/pssa.201127538 ↗