journal article·2017-12

MCDM selection of pulse parameters for best tribological performance of Cr–Al2O3 nano-composite co-deposited from trivalent chromium bath

A. Feizabadi, M. Salehi Doolabi, S.K. Sadrnezhaad, H.R. Zafarani, D. Salehi Doolabi, M. AsadiZarch

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Optimum operating parameters for pulse co-deposition of nano-Al 2 O 3 with Cr from a trivalent chromium bath onto Cu cathode are selected by using “technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution” (TOPSIS), “VIsekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje” (VIKOR), “elimination and choice expressing the reality” (ELECTRE) and “complex proportional assessment” (CORPAS) accompanied with analytic hierarchy processing (AHP) to compare methods for achievement of the best tribological coating performance. Criteria for appropriate selection include wear loss, corrosion resistance, micro-hardness, bath condition and current efficiency. Results ascertain the best Cr–Al 2 O 3 nano-composite coating with 40% duty cycle, 10 Hz current frequency and 1 g/L nano-Al 2 O 3 dispersed into the electrolyte bath. Comparison of the different calculated Speraman's coefficients weighed with the «subjective» analytic hierarchy process indicates more consistent results than «objective» entropy technique. The study clarifies the comparative capability of the weighing and the ranking methods in choosing the best way to make consistent final results independent of the level of knowledge and standpoints of the researchers. Recommendation of subjective rather than objective weighing apparatus to the MCDM researchers is therefore a constructive achievement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Influence of pulse parameters on electrocodeposition of Cr–Al2O3 nanocomposite coatings from trivalent chromium bath10.1179/1749514812Z.00000000030 ↗
2. Selection strategies for materials and processes10.1016/S0261-3069(03)00159-6 ↗
3. Planning of expert systems for materials selection10.1016/0261-3069(88)90031-3 ↗
4. Achieving a desirable combination of strength and workability in Al/SiC composites by AHP selection method10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.181 ↗
5. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.016 ↗
6. Characterization and selection of optimal parameters to achieve the best tribological performance of the electrodeposited Cr nanocomposite coating10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.017 ↗
7. Research on the supplier selection of a supply chain based on entropy weight and improved ELECTRE-III method10.1080/00207540903490171 ↗
8. Saaty · 1980
9. Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.044 ↗
10. A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.027 ↗
11. Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.042 ↗
12. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems
13. Electrochemical corrosion behavior of chromium–phosphorus coatings electrodeposited from trivalent chromium baths10.1016/j.electacta.2008.03.081 ↗
14. Pulsed electrodeposition of microcrystalline chromium from trivalent Cr-DMF bath10.1007/s10800-009-9816-3 ↗
15. Chromium electrodeposition using a chromium (III) glycine complex10.1023/A:1003403203094 ↗
16. Removal of chromate ion from aqueous solutions by sponge iron10.1080/19443994.2013.822335 ↗
17. Green walnut shell as a new material for removal of Cr (VI) ions from aqueous solutions10.1080/19443994.2014.917986 ↗
18. Effect of MoO2 and TiO2 on electrodeposition and properties of chromium coating10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01065-3 ↗
19. Electroplating and characterization of Cr–Al2O3 nanocomposite film from a trivalent chromium bath10.1108/ACMM-12-2012-1227 ↗
20. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
21. Analytical hierarchy processes (AHP) for the selection of solvents in early stages of pharmaceutical process development10.1016/j.psep.2011.03.003 ↗
22. Combination of TOPSIS and AHP in load shedding scheme for large pulp mill electrical system10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.059 ↗
23. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016 ↗
24. Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance. An application of multiple criteria decision making problem10.1023/B:JIMS.0000034112.00652.4c ↗
25. Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al–15% Mg 2 Si composite based on TOPSIS method10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.050 ↗
26. Shannon · 1948
27. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 ↗
28. A class of solutions for group decision problems10.1287/mnsc.19.8.936 ↗
29. Zeleny · 1982
30. Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method
31. Preference stability of compromise solution in multiple decision making
32. Yoon · 1995 · vol. 104
33. Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment
34. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods10.1007/BF00134132 ↗
35. Figueira · 2005 · 133
36. Tribological study of Ni matrix composite coatings containing nano and micro SiC particles10.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.090 ↗
37. Electrodeposition and mechanical and corrosion resistance properties of Ni–W/SiC nanocomposite coatings10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.007 ↗
38. Influence of SiO 2 nano-particles on microstructures and properties of Ni-WP/CeO 2-SiO 2 composites prepared by pulse electrodeposition10.1016/S1003-6326(09)60223-5 ↗
39. Electrodeposition and characterization of Ni–Zn–P and Ni–Zn–P/nano-SiC coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.011 ↗
40. Effect of titania particles preparation on the properties of Ni–TiO2 electrodeposited composite coatings10.1007/s10800-013-0565-y ↗
41. Study on tribological behavior of electrodeposited Cu–Si 3 N 4 composite coatings10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.030 ↗