Optimizing the wavelength response in one‐dimensional p‐Si Schottky barrier optical PSDs
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper reports on the varying wavelength response of optical position detectors made of different Schottky barrier metals, titanium, tantalum and aluminium. The best sensitivities came from the titanium devices, followed by the tantalum devices and finally the aluminium devices. The most linear devices were fabricated from tantalum followed by aluminium and the worst from titanium. The devices responded well under low intensity LED illumination indicating that common and cheap light sources are suitable for producing strong linear responses in these PSDs. Long wavelength illumination usually produced the highest sensitivities, though this depended on the Schottky metal used. Titanium devices averaged an increase of 250% between the responses for short (480 nm) and long wavelength (873 nm) light. The corresponding increase for tantalum devices was 125% while it was 116% for aluminium devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JRPROC.1957.27843510.1109/JRPROC.1957.278435 ↗
2. Martins R. · 2000
3. 10.1016/0924-4247(95)01214-110.1016/0924-4247(95)01214-1 ↗
4. 10.3390/s10090817310.3390/s100908173 ↗
5. 10.1109/JPROC.2005.85030210.1109/JPROC.2005.850302 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478643090288691010.1080/14786430902886910 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.02610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.026 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.328038210.1063/1.3280382 ↗
9. 10.3390/s10111015510.3390/s101110155 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1350-4533(96)00060-410.1016/S1350-4533(96)00060-4 ↗
11. Hogan H. · Photon. Spectra · 2010 · 4 · 41
12. 10.1109/JSEN.2003.81579210.1109/JSEN.2003.815792 ↗
13. Martin P. · Vac. Technol. Coat. · 2002 · 6
14. Marinova E. S. · Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulgare des Saimus · 1976 · 29 · 1425
15. 10.1049/el:1981026810.1049/el:19810268 ↗
16. Zia M. · Anal. Bioanal. Chem. · 2003 · 375 · 90210.1007/s00216-003-1788-2 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.33040110.1063/1.330401 ↗
18. 10.1109/JSEN.2006.88455510.1109/JSEN.2006.884555 ↗
19. Hrach R. · Mater. Sci. · 1987 · 13 · 37
20. 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00565-710.1016/S0169-4332(01)00565-7 ↗
21. 10.1002/pssa.20056610210.1002/pssa.200566102 ↗
22. Hecht E. · 1987
23. 10.1364/AO.11.00064310.1364/AO.11.000643 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.9.505610.1103/PhysRevB.9.5056 ↗
25. American Institute of Physics · 1957
26. 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90101-810.1016/0039-6028(84)90101-8 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.242601610.1149/1.2426016 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.242393210.1149/1.2423932 ↗
29. 10.1098/rspa.1973.011210.1098/rspa.1973.0112 ↗
30. P.Quintana A. I.Oliva O.Ceh J. E.Corona andM.Aguilar Superf. y Vacio December1999 No. 009 80–282.
31. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.09.02010.1016/j.tsf.2004.09.020 ↗
32. Sze S. M. · 1981
33. Bar‐Lev A. · 1984
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.55610.1103/PhysRevB.14.556 ↗
35. 10.1016/0925-3467(95)00043-710.1016/0925-3467(95)00043-7 ↗