Segregation-affected yielding and stability in nanotwinned silver by microalloying
Source abstract
Abstract
Small-scale mechanics of solute atom segregation and incipient plasticity in nanotwinned Ag containing trace concentrations of Cu were studied by using large-scale hybrid Monte Carlo and molecular-dynamic simulations. It is found that solute Cu atoms are segregated concurrently to grain boundaries and intrinsic twin-boundary kink-step defects during thermal annealing. Low Cu dopant contents below 1 at. % are predicted to substantially increase twin stability in nanotwinned Ag, accompanied with a pronounced rise in yield strength at 300 K. Incipient plasticity is associated with kink-step migration, grain-boundary sliding, and dislocation nucleation from grain boundaries and twin-boundary defects, which are affected by doping. Cu-dependent yield strengthening in doped nanotwinned Ag is shown to correlate with the critical stress required to initiate crystal slip emitted from grain boundaries and twin-boundary defects. These findings provide fundamental insight into the roles of twin-boundary imperfections on plastic yielding, and offer clues to further extend the extraordinary stability and strength of nanotwinned metals by microalloying.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs.2016.6210.1557/mrs.2016.62 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.116764110.1126/science.1167641 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.109290510.1126/science.1092905 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.296940910.1063/1.2969409 ↗
5. 10.1557/jmr.2012.37610.1557/jmr.2012.376 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.03010.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.030 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.22410310.1103/PhysRevB.82.224103 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0892910.1038/nature08929 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.05210.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.052 ↗
10. 10.1557/mrs.2016.6010.1557/mrs.2016.60 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat364610.1038/nmat3646 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms864810.1038/ncomms8648 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.03210.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.032 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.303594410.1063/1.3035944 ↗
15. A. Caro · 2010
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.03610.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.036 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.048 ↗
18. 10.3762/bjnano.4.6310.3762/bjnano.4.63 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.04110.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.041 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.06010.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.060 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.09510.1016/j.msea.2017.04.095 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.07810.1016/j.msea.2012.03.078 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.05710.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.057 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.008 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-016-0700-310.1007/s10853-016-0700-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.01110.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.011 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.487321510.1063/1.4873215 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.03010.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.030 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.02410.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.024 ↗
32. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.02610.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.026 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.22410110.1103/PhysRevB.83.224101 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.01310.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.013 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.18420310.1103/PhysRevB.85.184203 ↗
37. 10.1557/jmr.2013.5010.1557/jmr.2013.50 ↗
38. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
39. G. Voronoi · J. Reine Angew. Math. · 1908 · 138 · 19810.1515/crll.1908.134.198 ↗
40. 10.1109/MCSE.2014.8010.1109/MCSE.2014.80 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.122936910.1126/science.1229369 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.06610.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.066 ↗