Thermomigration of Au-Ge microdroplets on Ge(111): Atomic mechanisms and effects on surface morphology
Source abstract
Abstract
The motion of microdroplets under thermal gradients, also known as thermomigration (TM), plays a critical role in a wide range of surface phenomena and technological applications. In this work, we study the TM behavior of Au-Ge micro-droplets on Ge(111) surfaces and show that the droplet motion leads to the formation of atomically flat terraces, which are essential for thin film epitaxy. Experimental observations are combined with a microscopic model to investigate droplet motion and the formation of flat atomic terraces. Our results show that, at low temperatures, droplet velocity increases with size, but this size dependence diminishes as the temperature rises. The microscopic model we develop is based on thermally activated detachment, diffusion, and attachment of solute (Ge) atoms across the droplet, driven by a temperature-dependent concentration difference between the leading edge and the trailing edge. The model reproduces the experimental trends. Our results provide insights into the fundamental mechanisms of droplet TM and suggest ways to control surface morphology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aix Marseille University
CNRS
CINAM
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. C. F. W. Ludwig, Diffusion zwischen ungleich erwärmten Orten gleich zusammengesetzter Lösungen.–Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 20, 539 (1856).
2. C. Soret · Arch. Sci. Phys. Nat. Geneve · 1879 · 2 · 48
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.02.05710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.02.057 ↗
4. 10.1515/jnet-2016-002410.1515/jnet-2016-0024 ↗
5. L. Talbot · Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. · 1981 · 74 · 467
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12889310.1016/j.cej.2021.128893 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.06390210.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.063902 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.175397510.1063/1.1753975 ↗
9. 10.1143/JJAP.32.137910.1143/JJAP.32.1379 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.04542110.1103/PhysRevB.69.045421 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.05.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2017.05.005 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.12560210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.125602 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-017-00886-210.1038/s41598-017-00886-2 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.17610110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.176101 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14466710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144667 ↗
16. A. El-Barraj · Growth and electro-thermomigration on semiconductor surfaces by low energy electron microscopy · 2019
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.11540210.1103/PhysRevB.106.115402 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.022896110.1063/5.0228961 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00245-610.1016/S0040-6090(02)00245-6 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.172268810.1063/1.1722688 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.01610.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/0040-6031(89)87056-X10.1016/0040-6031(89)87056-X ↗
23. 10.1016/0039-6028(83)90537-X10.1016/0039-6028(83)90537-X ↗
24. 10.1063/5.004888210.1063/5.0048882 ↗
25. The error of a function Δf(x), given an error Δx of the input argument, is approximately Δf(x)≈dfdx·Δx. Using log10(x)=lnxln10, Δlog10(x)=0.434·Δxx. In our case, x is the droplet velocity.
26. 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)01034-110.1016/S0039-6028(99)01034-1 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.11742210.1063/1.117422 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.11541010.1103/PhysRevB.108.115410 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.11990210.1103/PhysRevB.110.119902 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.04621010.1103/PhysRevE.75.046210 ↗
31. B. N. Bhat · 1973
32. B. Mutaftschiev · 200110.1007/978-3-662-04591-6 ↗
33. G. Antczak · 201010.1017/CBO9780511730320 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.499136210.1063/1.4991362 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.32300810.1063/1.323008 ↗
36. At T0=913K, we measure from the phase diagram ωdn/dT=10−3K−1. ωneq = 0.5 and supposing Q = 3 eV, we find ωneqQkT02=2·10−2. dn/dT is twenty times smaller than neqQkT02. With a similar calculation at T0=1180K, we find that the difference between the two terms narrows but dn/dT is still six times smaller than neqQkT02.
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.11620210.1103/PhysRevLett.131.116202 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.115028810.1126/science.1150288 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.23541210.1103/PhysRevB.102.235412 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.04910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.049 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0251710.1021/acsanm.9b02517 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14945410.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149454 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-023-40157-510.1038/s41467-023-40157-5 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0277010.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02770 ↗
45. 10.1126/science.116954610.1126/science.1169546 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl901188610.1021/nl9011886 ↗
47. 10.1126/science.290.5496.156110.1126/science.290.5496.1561 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.23540610.1103/PhysRevB.89.235406 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.492109110.1063/1.4921091 ↗
50. 10.1016/0039-6028(91)90599-N10.1016/0039-6028(91)90599-N ↗
51. 10.1016/j.susc.2014.09.00110.1016/j.susc.2014.09.001 ↗