Octahedral distortions in SrNbO3 : Unraveling the structure-property relation
Source abstract
Abstract
Strontium niobate has triggered a lot of interest as a transparent conductor and as a possible realization of a correlated Dirac semimetal. Using the lattice parameters as a tunable knob, the energy landscape of octahedral tilting was mapped using density functional theory calculations. We find that biaxial compressive strain induces tilting around the out-of-plane axis, while tensile strain induces tilting around the two in-plane axes. The two competing distorted structures for compressive strain show semi-Dirac dispersions above the Fermi level in their electronic structure. Our density functional theory calculations combined with dynamical mean field theory reveal that dynamical correlations downshift these semi-Dirac-like cones towards the Fermi energy. More generally, our study reveals that the competition between the in-phase and out-of-phase tilting in ${\mathrm{SrNbO}}3$ provides a new degree of freedom that allows for tuning the thermoelectric and optical properties. We show how the tilt angle and mode are reflected in the behavior of the Seebeck coefficient and the plasma frequency due to changes in the band structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Topological Materials and Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10019000006210.1007/s100190000062 ↗
2. 10.1080/00150193.2015.99714610.1080/00150193.2015.997146 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.04.01510.1016/j.vacuum.2017.04.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.03.00310.1016/j.pecs.2017.03.003 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.47410.1103/PhysRevLett.12.474 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.142486611210.1073/pnas.1424866112 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.16110110.1103/PhysRevB.81.161101 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.479896310.1063/1.4798963 ↗
9. 10.1126/sciadv.abf963110.1126/sciadv.abf9631 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20110115210.1002/adma.201101152 ↗
11. 10.1557/mrs.2012.4910.1557/mrs.2012.49 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.20510210.1103/PhysRevB.92.205102 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.08500110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.085001 ↗
14. 10.1038/s42005-020-0372-910.1038/s42005-020-0372-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.05.02110.1016/j.mattod.2021.05.021 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-019-09698-610.1038/s41467-019-09698-6 ↗
17. N. Mott · 200410.1201/b12795 ↗
18. 10.1002/adom.20210052010.1002/adom.202100520 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
24. 10.1088/0953-8984/26/12/12220310.1088/0953-8984/26/12/122203 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.19510710.1103/PhysRevB.81.195107 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
27. P. Blaha · 2001
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.15511310.1103/PhysRevB.75.155113 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.01010.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.010 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.04511210.1103/PhysRevB.73.045112 ↗
31. 10.1107/S056774087200797610.1107/S0567740872007976 ↗
32. 10.1006/jssc.1999.835710.1006/jssc.1999.8357 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0009410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00094 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.17410110.1103/PhysRevB.88.174101 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.09410910.1103/PhysRevB.96.094109 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.02410710.1103/PhysRevB.91.024107 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.17410710.1103/PhysRevB.68.174107 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0150752710.1007/BF01507527 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.23512110.1103/PhysRevB.104.235121 ↗
40. D. M. Rowe · 2018
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.16680810.1103/PhysRevLett.102.166808 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.23511510.1103/PhysRevB.98.235115 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.03510210.1103/PhysRevB.104.035102 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.03543610.1103/PhysRevB.76.035436 ↗