Density functional theory study ofNO−H2Ocoadsorption on Cu(111)
Source abstract
Abstract
The coadsorption and complex formation of nitric oxide (NO) and water $({\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O})$ on Cu(111) are studied theoretically using the nonlocal van der Waals density functional method. The energetics, adsorption geometries, and vibrational properties of several $n\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{m\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ complexes $(n=1--4$, $m=1--3)$ on Cu(111) are reported, and the relative stabilities of those complexes are compared with their respective NO and ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ clusters on Cu(111). We find that the mixed $n\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{m\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ complexes on Cu(111) are more stable than separated NO and ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ clusters due to the attractive $\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ and NO-NO interactions on the surface. The attractive $\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ interaction originates mainly from the hydrogen bonding between ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ and the negatively charged NO upon adsorption. Moreover, hydrogen bonding also induces an additional back donation process from Cu(111), further strengthening the $\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ coadsorption. In addition to hydrogen bonding, the NO-NO interaction originating from $2{\ensuremath{\pi}}*$ orbital hybridization further stabilizes the formation of the $4\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}3{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ complex, which is observed in the experiment. Even though the hydrogen bonding strength in $\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ complexes is slightly weaker than the one in ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ clusters, due to the saturation of hydrogen bonding and the NO-NO interaction, NO and ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ tends to form a mixed $\mathrm{NO}\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ complex on Cu(111), in agreement with experiment. Our findings shed light on the role of intermolecular interactions between NO and ${\mathrm{H}}2\mathrm{O}$ in the formation of the NO complex, which is important for understanding the reaction of NO in three-way catalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0161494940800946810.1080/01614949408009468 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr100168g10.1021/cr100168g ↗
3. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/1/00210.1088/0953-8984/18/1/002 ↗
4. 10.1088/0953-8984/18/1/00310.1088/0953-8984/18/1/003 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp993090710.1021/jp9930907 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfrep.2020.10050010.1016/j.surfrep.2020.100500 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp960626510.1021/jp9606265 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp406068y10.1021/jp406068y ↗
9. 10.1021/jp406069q10.1021/jp406069q ↗
10. 10.1039/C3SC52334A10.1039/C3SC52334A ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.15610410.1103/PhysRevLett.106.156104 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.00710.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.007 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0289010.1021/acsomega.8b02890 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.00510.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.005 ↗
15. 10.1039/b201120b10.1039/b201120b ↗
16. 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)00987-910.1016/S0039-6028(96)00987-9 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.488126210.1063/1.4881262 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.489655810.1063/1.4896558 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07544210.1103/PhysRevB.94.075442 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00512-410.1016/S0920-5861(98)00512-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.01710.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.017 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0208710.1021/acsanm.1c02087 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1244710.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12447 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0120810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01208 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0856910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08569 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.0c0154910.1021/jacs.0c01549 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41467-020-15377-810.1038/s41467-020-15377-8 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0039210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00392 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmat194010.1038/nmat1940 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.7b0188310.1021/jacs.7b01883 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.24610110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246101 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2018.09.00410.1016/j.progsurf.2018.09.004 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.24640110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.472785010.1063/1.4727850 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.096102 ↗
36. 10.1088/0034-4885/78/6/06650110.1088/0034-4885/78/6/066501 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.1480210.1103/PhysRevB.51.14802 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.136024510.1063/1.1360245 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.24544010.1103/PhysRevB.93.245440 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.19513110.1103/PhysRevB.83.195131 ↗
41. 10.1039/D1CP02746H10.1039/D1CP02746H ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.11540710.1103/PhysRevB.73.115407 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.16541110.1103/PhysRevB.80.165411 ↗
45. D. R. Lide · 2004
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.03340510.1103/PhysRevB.63.033405 ↗
47. 10.1103/RevModPhys.60.60110.1103/RevModPhys.60.601 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00042-910.1016/S0039-6028(98)00042-9 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.07540810.1103/PhysRevB.102.075408 ↗
50. R. Bader · 199010.1093/oso/9780198551683.001.0001 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
52. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/8/08420410.1088/0953-8984/21/8/084204 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. 10.1351/PAC-REC-10-01-0210.1351/PAC-REC-10-01-02 ↗
55. 10.1039/b920857g10.1039/b920857g ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.19540410.1103/PhysRevB.69.195404 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.11.03610.1016/j.susc.2006.11.036 ↗
58. 10.1380/ejssnt.2008.9910.1380/ejssnt.2008.99 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.48077110.1063/1.480771 ↗
60. 10.1351/PAC-REP-10-01-0110.1351/PAC-REP-10-01-01 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.307954110.1063/1.3079541 ↗
62. 10.1007/s00894-016-3148-010.1007/s00894-016-3148-0 ↗
63. 10.1021/ja011446y10.1021/ja011446y ↗
64. 10.1039/C6CP06974F10.1039/C6CP06974F ↗
65. 10.1039/D2CP00673A10.1039/D2CP00673A ↗
66. 10.1063/1.496005310.1063/1.4960053 ↗
67. 10.1021/nn504824z10.1021/nn504824z ↗