Bayesian inference of grain growth prediction via multi-phase-field models
Source abstract
Abstract
We propose a Bayesian inference methodology to evaluate unobservable parameters involved in multi-phase-field models to accurately predict the observed grain growth, such as in metals and alloys. This approach integrates models and a set of observational image data of grain structures. Because the image data set is not a time series, directly applying conventional inference techniques that require time series as the input data is difficult. The key idea in our methodology to overcome this difficulty is to construct a time series with an appropriate statistic that characterizes static image data of grain structures. Our methodology implements the empirical Bayes method. It can estimate not only a probability density function of the parameters but also an initial phase field, which is generally unobservable in real experiments. After validating the proposed method through numerical tests using synthetic data, we apply it to real experimental images of grain structures in a steel alloy. The proposed method properly estimates unobservable parameters along with their uncertainties and successfully selects the initial phase field that best explains the experimental data from among candidate initial phase fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Metallurgy and Material Forming · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2355/isijinternational.36.19410.2355/isijinternational.36.194 ↗
2. 10.2355/isijinternational.44.123010.2355/isijinternational.44.1230 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.00910.1016/j.matdes.2008.03.009 ↗
4. 10.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-210.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-2 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:100457502228010.1023/A:1004575022280 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.742410.1103/PhysRevA.45.7424 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01077-610.1016/S1359-6462(01)01077-6 ↗
8. 10.1179/03071697780329261910.1179/030716977803292619 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.01710.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.017 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-310.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-710.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.06160510.1103/PhysRevE.74.061605 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10236-003-0036-910.1007/s10236-003-0036-9 ↗
14. G. Kitagawa · 201010.1201/9781584889229 ↗
15. S. Reich · 201510.1017/CBO9781107706804 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.04330710.1103/PhysRevE.94.043307 ↗
17. G. E. P. Box · 1973
18. E. Kalnay · 2003
19. 10.2151/jmsj.85B.33110.2151/jmsj.85B.331 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60442-210.1016/S0065-2687(08)60442-2 ↗
21. 10.1093/gji/ggv28910.1093/gji/ggv289 ↗
22. 10.1371/journal.pone.015991710.1371/journal.pone.0159917 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.04331110.1103/PhysRevE.98.043311 ↗
24. T. Koyama · 2015
25. 10.1080/14686996.2017.137892110.1080/14686996.2017.1378921 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.02510.1016/j.commatsci.2017.09.025 ↗
27. 10.1088/0965-0393/13/3/00710.1088/0965-0393/13/3/007 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.01510.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.02510.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.025 ↗
30. 10.1080/00031305.1985.1047940010.1080/00031305.1985.10479400 ↗
31. B. P. Carlin · 200010.1201/9781420057669 ↗
32. H. Nagao · 2013
33. 10.1016/0167-2789(93)90120-P10.1016/0167-2789(93)90120-P ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.13204110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.00710.1016/j.msea.2011.02.007 ↗