journal article·2019-03-25Open access

Ultrafast pulse phase shifts in a charged-quantum-dot–micropillar system

G. Slavcheva, M. Koleva, A. Rastelli

Physical Review B· Volume 99· Issue 11

Abstract

We employ a quantum master equations approach based on a vectorial Maxwell-pseudospin model to compute the quantum evolution of the spin populations and coherences in the fundamental singlet trion transition of a negatively charged quantum dot embedded in a micropillar cavity. Excitation of the system is achieved through an ultrashort, either circularly or linearly polarized resonant pulse. By implementing a realistic micropillar cavity geometry, we numerically demonstrate a giant optical phase shift ($\ensuremath{\sim}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\pi}/2$) of a resonant circularly polarized pulse in the weak-coupling regime. The phase shift that we predict considerably exceeds the experimentally observed Kerr rotation angle $(\ensuremath{\sim}{6}^{\ensuremath{\circ}})$ under a continuous-wave, linearly polarized excitation. By contrast, we show that a linearly polarized pulse is rotated to a much lesser extent of a few degrees. Depending on the initial boundary conditions, this is due to either retardation or advancement in the amplitude buildup in time of the orthogonal electric field component. Unlike previous published work, the dominant spin relaxation and decoherence processes are fully accounted for in the system dynamics. Our dynamical model can be used for optimization of the optical polarization rotation angle for realization of spin-photon entanglement and ultrafast polarization switching on a chip.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1157310.1038/nature11573 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat358510.1038/nmat3585 ↗
3. 10.1364/OPTICA.3.00143010.1364/OPTICA.3.001430 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.115464310.1126/science.1154643 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.108710.1103/PhysRevB.56.1087 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.08530710.1103/PhysRevB.78.085307 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.12531810.1103/PhysRevB.78.125318 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.11530310.1103/PhysRevB.83.115303 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.05380810.1103/PhysRevA.73.053808 ↗
10. M. A. Nielsen · 2000
11. 10.1038/ncomms723610.1038/ncomms7236 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.24140910.1103/PhysRevB.93.241409 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.12790210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127902 ↗
14. 10.1088/1464-4266/5/3/30410.1088/1464-4266/5/3/304 ↗
15. H. J. Carmichael · 200810.1007/978-3-540-71320-3 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.18040410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.180404 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.11530510.1103/PhysRevB.92.115305 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22740110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.227401 ↗
19. A. E. Siegman · 1986
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.11534710.1103/PhysRevB.77.115347 ↗
21. G. Slavcheva · 2017
22. 10.1063/1.172257210.1063/1.1722572 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.87910.1103/PhysRevA.28.879 ↗
24. M. Gell-Mann · 1964
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.83810.1103/PhysRevLett.47.838 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.06341810.1103/PhysRevA.66.063418 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.20530910.1103/PhysRevB.65.205309 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.18680210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.186802 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.19532710.1103/PhysRevB.71.195327 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.05380410.1103/PhysRevA.72.053804 ↗
31. A. Yariv · 1988
32. 10.1016/0375-9601(70)90177-510.1016/0375-9601(70)90177-5 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.6.84710.1103/PhysRevA.6.847 ↗