Normalization procedure for obtaining the local density of states from high-bias scanning tunneling spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Differential conductance spectroscopy performed in the high bias regime---in which the applied voltage exceeds the sample work function---is a suboptimal measure of the local density of states due to the effects of the changing tunnel barrier. Additionally, the large applied voltage oftentimes makes constant-height measurement experimentally impractical, lending constant-current spectroscopy an advantageous edge; but the differential conductance in that case is even further removed from the local density of states due to the changing tip height. Here, we present a normalization scheme for extracting the local density of states from high bias scanning tunneling spectroscopy, obtained in either constant-current or constant-height mode. We extend this model to account for the effects of the in-plane momentum of the probed states to the overall current. We demonstrate the validity of the proposed scheme by applying it to laterally confined field-emission resonances, which appear as peak-shaped spectroscopic features with a well-defined in-plane momentum.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.257910.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2579 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1117610.1103/PhysRevB.53.11176 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.03542110.1103/PhysRevB.75.035421 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.04540410.1103/PhysRevB.79.045404 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.23543210.1103/PhysRevB.75.235432 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.16541910.1103/PhysRevB.80.165419 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.11540410.1103/PhysRevB.76.115404 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.12540210.1103/PhysRevB.80.125402 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.91010.1103/PhysRevLett.73.910 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep0145410.1038/srep01454 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.03542510.1103/PhysRevB.88.035425 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.20542710.1103/PhysRevB.84.205427 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.24541110.1103/PhysRevB.82.245411 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.199810.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1998 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.80510.1103/PhysRevB.31.805 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.susc.2018.03.01510.1016/j.susc.2018.03.015 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0457410.1021/acsnano.2c04574 ↗
18. 10.1016/0375-9601(83)90969-610.1016/0375-9601(83)90969-6 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.170268210.1063/1.1702682 ↗
20. 10.1098/rspa.1928.009110.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
21. L. Landau · 1977
22. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2006.07.00410.1016/j.progsurf.2006.07.004 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.08680710.1103/PhysRevLett.102.086807 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.164110.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1641 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.11540410.1103/PhysRevB.72.115404 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.19540410.1103/PhysRevB.76.195404 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.216510.1103/PhysRevLett.65.2165 ↗
28. 10.1038/3509805310.1038/35098053 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.514536310.1063/1.5145363 ↗
30. 10.1038/nnano.2016.13110.1038/nnano.2016.131 ↗
31. 10.21468/SciPostPhys.2.3.02010.21468/SciPostPhys.2.3.020 ↗
32. 10.1038/nphys408010.1038/nphys4080 ↗
33. 10.1016/0039-6028(83)90122-X10.1016/0039-6028(83)90122-X ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.11510110.1103/PhysRevB.83.115101 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.04680110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.046801 ↗
36. 10.1016/0039-6028(88)90334-210.1016/0039-6028(88)90334-2 ↗
37. 1993
38. 10.5281/zenodo.647307910.5281/zenodo.6473079 ↗