journal article·2023-03-30Open access

Time-dependent exchange-correlation hole and potential of the electron gas

K. Karlsson, F. Aryasetiawan

Physical Review B· Volume 107· Issue 11

Abstract

The exchange-correlation hole and potential of the homogeneous electron gas have been investigated within the random-phase approximation, employing the plasmon-pole approximation for the linear density response function. The angular dependence as well as the time dependence of the exchange-correlation hole are illustrated for a Wigner-Seitz radius ${r}s=4$ (atomic unit). It is found that there is a substantial cancellation between exchange and correlation potentials in space and time, analogous to the cancellation of exchange and correlation self-energies. Analysis of the sum rule explains why it is more advantageous to use a noninteracting Green function than a renormalized one when calculating the response function within the random-phase approximation and consequently the self-energy within the well-established $GW$ approximation. The present study provides a starting point for more accurate and comprehensive calculations of the exchange-correlation hole and potential of the electron gas with the aim of constructing a model based on the local density approximation as in density functional theory.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. R. M. Martin · 200410.1017/CBO9780511805769 ↗
2. G. D. Mahan · 200010.1007/978-1-4757-5714-9 ↗
3. R. M. Martin · 201610.1017/CBO9781139050807 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A79610.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
5. F. Aryasetiawan · 202210.1063/9780735422490 ↗
6. 10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/00210.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002 ↗
7. A. L. Fetter · 2003
8. J. W. Negele · 1998
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.07510610.1103/PhysRevB.105.075106 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.04512310.1103/PhysRevB.106.045123 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.427410.1103/PhysRevB.13.4274 ↗
12. 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.68910.1103/RevModPhys.61.689 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRev.85.33810.1103/PhysRev.85.338 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.486959810.1063/1.4869598 ↗
17. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.89710.1103/RevModPhys.87.897 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.99710.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.495303910.1063/1.4953039 ↗
21. L. Hedin · 1969
22. 10.1103/PhysRev.81.38510.1103/PhysRev.81.385 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.47110.1103/PhysRevB.1.471 ↗
24. 10.1139/p73-01210.1139/p73-012 ↗
25. 10.1088/0031-8949/21/3-4/03910.1088/0031-8949/21/3-4/039 ↗
26. C.-O. Almbladh · 1983
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.226810.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2268 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.08511210.1103/PhysRevB.90.085112 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.1329810.1103/PhysRevB.44.13298 ↗
30. N. W. Ashcroft · 1976