Consideration of Stress Stiffening and Material Reorientation in Modal Space Based Finite Element Solutions
Source abstract
Abstract
Structural deformations are an important aspect of many engineering tasks. They are typically resolved as “off-line” finite element computations with accuracy set as the primary objective. Though high computational efficiency is always an important aspect, in certain applications its priority is of equal or similar importance as the accuracy itself. This paper tackles the problem of proper extension of linear models with the objective of keeping high numerical efficiency and covering moderate geometric nonlinearities. Modal-space based approach is addressed as one of the standard techniques for robust model reduction. Two extensions are proposed to account for moderate geometric nonlinearities in modal-space based solutions, one accounting for stress stiffening effect and the other for moderate material rigid-body rotations during deformation. Examples are provided to demonstrate the applicability and discuss the aspects of proposed techniques.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Marinkovic, D., Zehn, M., and Marinkovic, Z., Finite Element Formulations for Effective Computations of Geometrically Nonlinear Deformations, Adv. Eng. Software, 2012, vol. 50, pp. 3–11.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.04.005 ↗
2. Dietz, S., Hippmann, G., and Shupp, G., Interaction of Vehicles and Flexible Tracks by Co–Simulation of Multibody Vehicle Systems and Finite Element Track Models, Int. J. Vehicle Mech. Mobility, 2002, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 327–384.
3. Busch, M. and Schweizer, B., Coupled Simulation of Multibody and Finite Element Systems: An Efficient and Robust Semi–Implicit Coupling Approach, Arch. Appl. Mech., 2012, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 723–741.10.1007/s00419-011-0586-0 ↗
4. Swidergal, K., Lubeseder, C., Wurmb, V.I., Lipp, A., Meinhardt, J., Wagner, M., and Marburg, S., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Blankholder’s Vibration in a Forming Tool: A Coupled MBS–FEM Approach, Product. Eng., 2015, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 623–634.10.1007/s11740-015-0640-9 ↗
5. Nguyen, V.A., Zehn, M., and Marinkovic, D., An Efficient Co–Rotational FEM Formulation Using a Projector Matrix, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2016, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 227–240.
6. Ordaz–Hernandez, K., Fischer, X., and Bennis, F., Model Reduction Technique for Mechanical Behaviour Model–ling: Efficiency Criteria and Validity Domain Assessment, Proc. IMechE. C. J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2008, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 493–505.10.1243/09544062JMES683 ↗
7. Ćojbašić, Z., Nikolić, V., Petrović, E., Pavlović, V., Tomić, M., Pavlović, I., and Ćirić, I., A Real Time Neural Network Based Finite Element Analysis of Shell Structure, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2014, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–155.
8. Hambli, R., Chamekh, A., and Salah, H.B.H., Real–Time Deformation of Structure Using Finite Element and Neural Networks in Virtual Reality Applications, Finite Elem. Analysis Design., 2006, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 985–991.10.1016/j.finel.2006.03.008 ↗
9. Craig, R.R. and Bampton, M.C.C., Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analyses, AIAA J., 1968, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1313–1319.10.2514/3.4741 ↗
10. Schwertassek, R. and Wallrapp, O., Dynamik Flexibler Mehrkorpersysteme, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999.
11. Dietz, S., Wallrapp, O., and Wiedemann, S., Nodal Versus Modal Representation in Flexible Multibody System Dynamics, in Proc. Int. Conf. Advanced in Computational Multibody Dynamics’ Multibody Dynamics 2003, Ambrosio, J.A.C., Ed., Lisbon: IDMEC/IST, 2003.
12. Xue, Z.P., Li, M., and Jia, H.G., Modal Method for Dynamics Analysis of Cantilever Type Structures at Large Rotational Deformations, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2015, vol. 93, pp. 22–31.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.003 ↗
13. Poon, C.W. and Chang, C.C., Identification of Nonlinear Elastic Structures Using Empirical Mode Decomposition and Nonlinear Normal Modes, Smart Struct. Syst., 2007, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 423–437.10.12989/sss.2007.3.4.423 ↗
14. Bathe, K.J., Finite Element Procedures, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
15. Popov, V.L. and Hess, M., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction, Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6 ↗
16. Hess, M. and Popov, V.L., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction: A User’s Handbook. II. Power–Law Graded Materials, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2016, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 251–268.10.22190/FUME1603251H ↗