Enhanced Energy Harvesting by Devices with the Metamaterial Substrate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, the optimal use of existing energy sources is just as important as the development of new and alternative energy sources. One of the available and renewable energy sources is vibrations. The simplest way to use this energy source is piezoelectric energy harvesters. These harvesters consist of two parts, the piezoelectric element and the substrate to which the piezoelectric element is connected. The geometric structure of the substrate can greatly influence the efficiency of a harvester. In this study, the effect of auxetic substrates on the output voltage of energy harvesters is investigated. For this purpose, two auxetic substrates and one plain substrate are investigated experimentally and numerically. The results show that the use of auxetic substrates 1 and 2 increases the output voltage by 3.45 and 2.18 times, respectively, compared to the plain substrate. A parametric study is conducted to better understand the effect of the geometric parameters of the auxetic unit cell on the energy harvested. Because of the stress concentration and porosity in auxetic substrates and the application of periodic loading, it is necessary to study the growth of cracks and the fatigue life of these structures. The results show that auxetic substrates 1 and 2 have 50 and 72% shorter fatigue lives than the plain substrate, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Alhawari, M., Mohammad, B., Saleh, H., and Ismail, M., Energy Harvesting for Self-Powered Wearable Devices, Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-62578-2 ↗
2. Tian, R., Wan, C., Hayashi, N., Aoai, T., and Koumoto, K., Wearable and Flexible Thermoelectrics for Energy Harvesting, MRS Bullet., 2018, vol. 43(3), pp. 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2018.810.1557/mrs.2018.8 ↗
3. Díez, P.L., Gabilondo, I., Alarcón, E., and Moll, F., A Comprehensive Method to Taxonomize Mechanical Energy Harvesting Technologies, in IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems: ISCAS-2018, IEEE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2018.835090710.1109/ISCAS.2018.8350907 ↗
4. Narita, F. and Fox, M., A Review on Piezoelectric, Magnetostrictive, and Magnetoelectric Materials and Device Technologies for Energy Harvesting Applications, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2018, vol. 20(5), p. 1700743. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700743 ↗
5. Wang, H., Jasim, A., and Chen, X., Energy Harvesting Technologies in Roadway and Bridge for Different Applications—A Comprehensive Review, Appl. Energy, 2018, vol. 212, pp. 1083–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.125 ↗
6. Mescia, L., Innovative Materials and Systems for Energy Harvesting Applications, IGI Global, 2015.10.4018/978-1-4666-8254-2 ↗
7. Ilyas, M.A., Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting: Methods, Progress, and Challenges, Momentum Press, 2018.
8. Bhalla, S., Moharana, S., Talakokula, V., and Kaur, N., Piezoelectric Materials: Applications in SHM, Energy Harvesting and Biomechanics, John Wiley & Sons, 2016.10.1002/9781119265139 ↗
9. Izadgoshasb, I., Performance Enhancement of Human Motion Based Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters, Southern Cross University, 2019.10.3390/en12142770 ↗
10. Erturk, A. and Inman, D.J., On Mechanical Modeling of Cantilevered Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesters, J. Intelligent Mater. Syst. Struct., 2008, vol. 19(11), pp. 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X07085639 ↗
11. Erturk, A. and Inman, D.J., A Distributed Parameter Electromechanical Model for Cantilevered Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters, J. Vibr. Acoust., 2008, vol. 130(4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2890402 ↗
12. Erturk, A. and Inman, D.J., An Experimentally Validated Bimorph Cantilever Model for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting from Base Excitations, Smart Mater. Struct., 2009, vol. 18(2), p. 025009.10.1088/0964-1726/18/2/025009 ↗
13. Zadpoor, A.A., Mechanical Meta-materials, Mater. Horizons, 2016, vol. 3(5), pp. 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MH00065G10.1039/C6MH00065G ↗
14. Barchiesi, E., Spagnuolo, M., and Placidi, L., Mechanical Metamaterials: A State of the Art, Math. Mech. Solids, 2019, vol. 24(1), pp. 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286517735695 ↗
15. Prawoto, Y., Seeing Auxetic Materials from the Mechanics Point of View: A Structural Review on the Negative Poisson's Ratio, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, vol. 58, pp. 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012 ↗
16. Evans, K.E. and Alderson, A., Auxetic Materials: Functional Materials and Structures from Lateral Thinking, Adv. Mater., 2000, vol. 12(9), pp. 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
17. Evans, K.E. and Alderson, K., Auxetic Materials: The Positive Side of Being Negative, Eng. Sci. Educat. J., 2000, vol. 9(4), pp. 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1049/esej:2000040210.1049/esej:20000402 ↗
18. Lvov, V.A., Senatov, F.S., Korsunsky, A.M., and Salimon, A.I., Design and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Auxetic Honeycomb Structure, Mater. Today Commun., 2020, p. 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101173 ↗
19. Alomarah, A., Ruan, D., and Masood, S., Tensile Properties of an Auxetic Structure with Re-Entrant and Chiral Features—A Finite Element Study, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, vol. 99(9–12), pp. 2425–2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2637-y ↗
20. Wang, Z.P., Poh, L.H., Dirrenberger, J., Zhu, Y., and Forest, S., Isogeometric Shape Optimization of Smoothed Petal Auxetic Structures Via Computational Periodic Homogenization, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 2017, vol. 323, pp. 250–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.01310.1016/j.cma.2017.05.013 ↗
21. Wang, X.T., Wang, B., Li, X.W., and Ma, L., Mechanical Properties of 3D Re-Entrant Auxetic Cellular Structures, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2017, vol. 131, pp. 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.04810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.048 ↗
22. Yang, L., Harrysson, O., West, H., and Cormier, D., Mechanical Properties of 3D Re-Entrant Honeycomb Auxetic Structures Realized Via Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2015, vol. 69, pp. 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
23. Novak, N., Vesenjak, M., Tanaka, S., Hokamoto, K., and Ren, Z., Compressive Behaviour of Chiral Auxetic Cellular Structures at Different Strain Rates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2020, p. 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10356610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103566 ↗
24. Nečemer, B., Glodež, S., Novak, N., and Kramberger, J., Numerical Modelling of a Chiral Auxetic Cellular Structure under Multiaxial Loading Conditions, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2020, vol. 107, p. 102514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10251410.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102514 ↗
25. Grima, J.N., Gatt, R., and Farrugia, P.S., On the Properties of Auxetic Meta-tetrachiral Structures, Phys. Stat. Solid. B, 2008, vol. 245(3), pp. 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20077770410.1002/pssb.200777704 ↗
26. Cho, H., Seo, D., and Kim, D.-N., Mechanics of Auxetic Materials, in Handbook of Mechanics of Materials, Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 733–757.10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3_25 ↗
27. Jiang, Y., Rudra, B., Shim, J., and Li, Y., Limiting Strain for Auxeticity under Large Compressive Deformation: Chiral vs. Re-Entrant Cellular Solids, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2019, vol. 162, pp. 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.03510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.035 ↗
28. Khan, S.Z., Mustahsan, F., Mahmoud, E.R., and Masood, S.H., A Novel Modified Re-Entrant Honeycomb Structure to Enhance the Auxetic Behavior: Analytical and Numerical Study by FEA, Mater. Today Proc., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.08310.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.083 ↗
29. Sangsefidi, A.R., Dibajian, S.H., Kadkhodapour, J., Anaraki, A.P., Schmauder, S., and Schneider, Y., An Abaqus Plugin for Evaluation of the Auxetic Structure Performance, Eng. Computers, 2021, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01295-w ↗
30. Fey, T., Eichhorn, F., Han, G., Ebert, K., Wegener, M., Roosen, A., and Greil, P., Mechanical and Electrical Strain Response of a Piezoelectric Auxetic PZT Lattice Structure, Smart Mater. Struct., 2015, vol. 25(1), p. 015017. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015017 ↗
31. Iyer, S., Alkhader, M., and Venkatesh, T., Electromechanical Behavior of Auxetic Piezoelectric Cellular Solids, Scripta Mater., 2015, vol. 99, pp. 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.11.030 ↗
32. Li, Q., Kuang, Y., and Zhu, M., Auxetic Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters for Increased Electric Power Output, AIP Adv., 2017, vol. 7(1), p. 015104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497431010.1063/1.4974310 ↗
33. Ferguson, W.J., Kuang, Y., Evans, K.E., Smith, C.W., and Zhu, M., Auxetic Structure for Increased Power Output of Strain Vibration Energy Harvester, Sensor. Actuator. A. Phys., 2018, vol. 282, pp. 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.01910.1016/j.sna.2018.09.019 ↗
34. Eghbali, P., Younesian, D., and Farhangdoust, S., Enhancement of Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting with Auxetic Boosters, Int. J. Energy Res., 2020, vol. 44(2), pp. 1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.501010.1002/er.5010 ↗
35. Eghbali, P., Younesian, D., and Farhangdoust, S., Enhancement of the Low-Frequency Acoustic Energy Harvesting with Auxetic Resonators, Appl. Energy, 2020, vol. 270. p. 115217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11521710.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115217 ↗
36. Eghbali, P., Younesian, D., Moayedizadeh, A., and Ranjbar, M., Study in Circular Auxetic Structures for Efficiency Enhancement in Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting, Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10(1), pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73425-1 ↗
37. Chen, K., Gao, Q., Fang, S., Zou, D., Yang, Z., and Liao, W.H., An Auxetic Nonlinear Piezoelectric Energy Harvester for Enhancing Efficiency and Bandwidth, Appl. Energy, 2021, vol. 298, p. 117274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117274 ↗
38. Ebrahimian, F., Kabirian, Z., Younesian, D., and Eghbali, P., Auxetic Clamped-Clamped Resonators for High-Efficiency Vibration Energy Harvesting at Low-Frequency Excitation, Appl. Energy, 2021, vol. 295, p. 117010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11701010.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117010 ↗
39. Kramberger, J., Nečemer, B., and Glodež, S., Assessing the Cracking Behavior of Auxetic Cellular Structures by Using Both a Numerical and an Experimental Approach, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2019, vol. 101, pp. 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.02.00810.1016/j.tafmec.2019.02.008 ↗
40. Francesconi, L., Baldi, A., Dominguez, G., and Taylor, M., An Investigation of the Enhanced Fatigue Performance of Low-Porosity Auxetic Metamaterials, Exp. Mech., 2020, vol. 60(1), pp. 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00539-7 ↗
41. Peng, C., Tran, P., Nguyen-Xuan, H., and Ferreira, A.J.M., Mechanical Performance and Fatigue Life Prediction of Lattice Structures: Parametric Computational Approach, Compos. Struct., 2020, vol. 235, p. 111821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11182110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111821 ↗
42. Rafique, S. and Rafique, Q., Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesting, Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-69442-9 ↗
43. Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
44. Hu, X., Xu, J., Du, X., Zhang, Y., and Zhou, F., Research on Fatigue Crack Propagation of 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Based on XFEM and CZM, Metals, 2020, vol. 10(6), p. 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1006072710.3390/met10060727 ↗
45. Teimouri, F., Heidari-Rarani, M., and Aboutalebi, F.H., An XFEM-VCCT Coupled Approach for Modeling Mode I Fatigue Delamination in Composite Laminates under High Cycle Loading, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2021, vol. 249, p. 107760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10776010.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107760 ↗