What does friction really depend on? Robust governing parameters in contact mechanics and friction
Source abstract
Abstract
It is known that the coefficient of friction generally depends on a large number of system and loading parameters. Already Coulomb presented experimental evidence that the static coefficient of friction may depend on time, on normal force, on the contact size, on the nature of contacting materials, and on the presence of intermediate lubricant layers. For the sliding coefficient of friction, he observed the dependence on the sliding velocity as well as the force and size dependencies. Later research has shown that the friction coefficient is very sensitive to the presence of oscillations (including self-excited vibrations). In spite of the practical importance of the problem, no generalized laws of friction or empirical procedures for measuring and representing the law of friction have been developed so far, which included at least the following four parameters: contacting body velocity, normal force, shape (and thus implicitly size), and time. In the present paper, we discuss the question of how the dimension of space of governing parameters can be reduced and if a small set of “robust governing parameters” of friction can be identified. We argue that one of such robust governing parameters is the indentation depth (or relative approach) of contacting bodies and discuss further candidates for the role of robust governing parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Persson, B.N.J., Sliding Friction: Physical Principles and Applications, Springer, 1999.
2. Popov, V.L., Contact Mechanics and Friction: Physical Principles and Applications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-10803-7 ↗
3. Amontons, G., De la resistance cause’e dans les machines (About Resistance and Force in Machines), Mem. l’ Acedemie R. A, 1699, pp. 257-282.
4. Coulomb, C.A., Theorie des machines simple (Theory of Simple Machines), Paris: Bachelier, 1821.
5. Popova, E. and Popov, V.L., The Research Works of Coulomb and Amontons and Generalized Laws of Friction, Friction, 2015, vol. 3(2), pp. 183–190.10.1007/s40544-015-0074-6 ↗
6. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
7. Archard, J.F., Elastic Deformation and the Laws of Friction, Proc. R. Soc. A, 1957, vol. 243, pp. 190–205.10.1098/rspa.1957.0214 ↗
8. He, G., Müser, M.H., and Robbins, M.O., Adsorbed Layers and the Origin of Static Friction, Science, 1999, vol. 284, pp. 1650–1652.10.1126/science.284.5420.1650 ↗
9. Barber, J.R., Multiscale Surfaces and Amontons’ Law of Friction, Tribol. Lett., 2013, vol. 49, pp. 539–543.10.1007/s11249-012-0094-6 ↗
10. Otsuki, M. and Matsukawa, H., Systematic Breakdown of Amontons’ Law of Friction for an Elastic Object Locally Obeying Amontons’ Law, Sci. Rep., 2013, vol. 3, p. 1586.10.1038/srep01586 ↗
11. Rubinstein, S.M., Cohen, G., and Fineberg, J., Detachment Fronts and the Onset of Dynamic Friction, Nature, 2004, vol. 430, pp. 1005–1009.10.1038/nature02830 ↗
12. Li, Q., Popov, M., Dimaki, A., Filippov, A.E., Kürschner, S., and Popov, V.L., Friction between a Viscoelastic Body and a Rigid Surface with Random Self-Affine Roughness, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2013, vol. 111, p. 034301.10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.034301 ↗
13. de Wit, C.C., Olsson, H., Astrom, K., and Lischinsky, P., A New Model for Control of Systems with Friction, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control., 1995, vol. 40, pp. 419–425.10.1109/9.376053 ↗
14. Peng, J.Y. and Chen, D.B., Modeling of Piezoelectric-Driven Stick-Slip Actuators, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 2010, vol. 99, pp. 1–6.
15. Dupont, P., Armstrong, B., and Hayward, V., Elasto-Plastic Friction Model: Contact Compliance and Stiction, Proc. Am. Control Conf. 2, Chicago, 2000, pp. 10721077.
16. Milahin, N. and Starcevic, S., Influence of the Normal Force and Contact Geometry on the Static Force of Friction of an Oscillating Sample, Phys. Mesomech., 2014, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 228–231.10.1134/S1029959914030084 ↗
17. Nguyen, H.X., Teidelt, E., Popov, V.L., and Fatikow, S., Modeling and Waveform Optimization of Stick-Slip Micro-drives Using the Method of Dimensionality Reduction, Arch. Appl. Mech., doi 10.1007/s00419-014-0934-y.
18. Dieterich, J.H., Time Dependent Friction and the Mechanics of Stick-Slip, Pure Appl. Geophys., 1978, vol. 116, pp. 790–806.10.1007/BF00876539 ↗
19. Dieterich, J.H., Modeling of Rock Friction: 1. Experimental Results and Constitutive Equations, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth., 1979, vol. 84, pp. 2161–2168.10.1029/JB084iB05p02161 ↗
20. Rice, J.R. and Ruina, A.L., Stability of Steady Frictional Slipping, J. Appl. Mech., 1983, vol. 50, pp. 343–349.10.1115/1.3167042 ↗
21. Grosch, K.A., The Relation between the Friction and Visco-Elastic Properties of Rubber, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1963, vol. 274, pp.21–39.10.1098/rspa.1963.0112 ↗
22. Le Gal, A., Yang, X., and Klüppel, M., Evaluation of Sliding Friction and Contact Mechanics of Elastomers Based on Dynamic-Mechanical Analysis, J. Chem. Phys., 2005, vol. 123, p. 014704.10.1063/1.1943410 ↗
23. Popov, V.L., Voll, L., Li, Q., Chai, Y.S., and Popov, M., Generalized Law of Friction between Elastomers and Differently Shaped Rough Bodies, Sci. Rep., 2014, vol. 4, p. 3750. doi 10.1038/srep03750.10.1038/srep03750 ↗
24. Popov, V.L., Dimaki, A., Psakhie, S., and Popov, M., On the Role of Scales in Contact Mechanics and Friction between Elastomers and Randomly Rough Self-Affine Surfaces, Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, p. 11139.10.1038/srep11139 ↗
25. Lee, E.H., Stress Analysis in Viscoelastic Bodies, Quart. Appl. Math., 1955, vol. 13, pp. 183–190.10.1090/qam/69741 ↗
26. Radok, J.R.M., Visco-Elastic Stress Analysis, Quart. Appl. Math., 1957, vol. 15, pp. 198–202.10.1090/qam/92453 ↗
27. Kürschner, S. and Popov, V.L., Penetration of Self-Affine Fractal Rough Rigid Bodies into a Model Elastomer Having a Linear Viscous Rheology, Phys. Rev. E, 2013, vol. 87, p. 042802.10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042802 ↗
28. Norbury, A.L. and Samuel, T., The Recovery and Sinkingin or Piling-up of Material in the Brinel Test, J. Iron Steel Inst., 1928, vol. 117, p. 673.
29. Popov, V.L. and Heß, M., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction, Berlin: Springer, 2014.
30. Argatov, I.I. and Sabina, F.J., Spherical Indentation of a Transversely Isotropic Elastic Half-Space Reinforced with a Thin Layer, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2012, vol. 50, pp. 132–143.10.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.08.009 ↗
31. Gao, H.J., Chiu, C.H., and Lee, J., Elastic Contact versus Indentation Modeling of Multi-Layered Materials, Int. J. Solids Struct., 1992, vol. 29, pp. 2471–2492.10.1016/0020-7683(92)90004-D ↗
32. Popov, V.L., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Tribology. Heterogeneous Media, Phys. Mesomech., 2014, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 50–57.10.1134/S1029959914010068 ↗
33. Teidelt, E., Oscillating Contacts: Friction Induced Motion and Control of Friction: Dissertation, Berlin: Berlin University of Technology, 2015, https://opus4kobvde/ opus4-tuberlin/files/6108/teidelt_elenapdf.
34. Starcevic, J. and Filippov, A.E., Simulation of the Influence of Ultrasonic In-Plane Oscillations on Dry Friction Accounting for Stick and Creep, Phys. Mesomech., 2012, vol. 15, no. 5-6, pp. 330–332.10.1134/S1029959912030150 ↗
35. Milahin, N. and Starcevic, J., Influence of the Normal Force and Contact Geometry on the Static Force of Friction of an Oscillating Sample, Phys. Mesomech., 2014, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 228–231.10.1134/S1029959914030084 ↗
36. Milahin, N., Li, Q., and Starcevic, J., Influence of the Normal Force on the Sliding Friction under Ultrasonic Oscillations, Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 2015, vol. 13(11), pp. 27–32.
37. Popov, V.L., Kontaktmechanik und Reibung. Von der Nanotribologie bis zur Erdbebendynamik, Berlin: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-662-45975-1 ↗
38. Paggi, M., Pohrt, R., and Popov, V.L., Partial-Slip Frictional Response of Rough Surfaces, Sci. Rep., 2014, vol. 4, p. 5178. doi 10.1038/srep05178.10.1038/srep05178 ↗
39. Grzemba, B., Pohrt, R., Teidelt, E., and Popov, V.L., Maximum Micro-Slip in Tangential Contact of Randomly Rough Self-Affine Surfaces, Wear, 2014, vol. 309(1), pp. 256–258.10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.050 ↗
40. Persson, B.N.J., Albohr, O., Tartaglino, U., and Volokitin, A.I., and Tosatti, E., On the Nature of Surface Roughness with Application to Contact Mechanics, Sealing, Rubber Friction and Adhesion, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. R, 2005, vol. 17, pp. 1–62.
41. Sivebaek, I.M., Samoilov, V.N., and Persson, B.N.J., Effective Viscosity of Confined Hydrocarbons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, vol. 108, p. 036102.10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.036102 ↗
42. Hyun, S., Pei, L., Molinari, J.-F., and Robbins, M.O., Finite-Element Analysis of Contact between Elastic Self-Affine Surfaces, Phys. Rev. E, 2004, vol. 70, p. 026117.10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026117 ↗
43. Pohrt, R. and Popov, V.L., Normal Contact Stiffness of Elastic Solids with Fractal Rough Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett, 2012, vol. 108, p. 104301.10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.104301 ↗
44. Pohrt, R., Normal Stiffness of Multiscale Rough Surfaces in Elastic Contact: Thesis, Berlin: Berlin University of Technology, 2013.
45. Greenwood, J.A. and Williamson, J.B.P., Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. A, 1966, vol. 295, p. 300.10.1098/rspa.1966.0242 ↗
46. Dimaki, A.V. and Popov, V.L., Coefficient of Friction between a Rigid Conical Indenter and a Model Elastomer: Influence of Local Frictional Heating, Phys. Mesomech., 2015, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75–80.10.1134/S1029959915010087 ↗
47. Li, Q., Dimaki, A., Popov, M., Psakhie, S.G., and Popov, V.L., Kinetics of the Coefficient of Friction of Elastomers, Sci. Rep., 2014, vol. 4, p. 5795.10.1038/srep05795 ↗