Intelligent Tuning of PID Controller to Balance the Shape Memory Wire Actuated Ball and Beam System
Source abstract
Abstract
The ball on beam system is a highly nonlinear laboratory model which helps to understand the modern and classical control theory. This paper emphasizes the position control of a ball on beam system which is actuated by shape memory alloy wires in an antagonistic configuration. The shape memory alloy actuator provides the necessary force to actuate the beam in the left and right directions of angular position. To achieve effective control of any system it is necessary to design the controller optimally but it is very difficult due to the requirement of proper tuning which is not feasible by the conventionally designed controller. The objective of this paper is the optimal design of the well-received PID controller by using intelligent tuning techniques to drive the system with the best performance. Since the genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization are the numerical algorithms that have been extensively used to solve all types of complex engineering problems to improve their performance, these algorithms are used to tune the PID controller. The results of genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization are benchmarked with a conventionally designed PID controller.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iterative Learning Control Systems · Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Rahmat, M.F., Wahid, H., and Wahab, N.A., Application of Intelligent Controller in a Ball and Beam Control System, Int. J. Smart Sensing Intellig. Syst., 2010, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–60.10.21307/ijssis-2017-378 ↗
2. Moallem, M. and Tabrizi, V.A., Tracking Control of an Antagonistic Shape Memory Alloy Actuator Pair, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2009, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 184–190.10.1109/TCST.2008.922506 ↗
3. Nespoli, A., Besseghini, S., Pittacio, S., Vill, E., and Viscuso, S., The High Potential of Shape Memory Alloy in Developing Miniature Mechanical Devices: A Review on Shape Memory Mini-Actuators, Sens. Actuator, 2010, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 149–160.10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.020 ↗
4. Teh, Y.H. and Featherstone, R., An Architecture for Fast and Accurate Control of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators, Int. J. Robot. Res., 2008, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1–18.10.1177/0278364908090951 ↗
5. Romano, R. and Tannuri, E.A., Modelling, Control and Experimental Validation of a Novel Actuator Based on Shape Memory Alloys, Mechatronics, 2009, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1169–1177.10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.03.007 ↗
6. Selvarani Ruth, D.J., Sunjai Nakshatharan, S., and Dhanalakshmi, K., Auto-Adaptive Control of a One Joint Arm Direct Driven by Antagonistic Shape Memory Alloy, Int. J. Smart Sens. Intelligent Syst., 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 833–839.10.21307/ijssis-2017-568 ↗
7. Banu Sundareswari, M., Sunjai Nakshatharan, S., Selvarani Ruth, D.J., and Dhanalakshmi, K., Optimal Design of PID Controller for Shape Memory Alloy Actuated Ball on Beam, in Proc. of Int. Conf. Intelligent Unmanned Systems (ICIUS), Jaipur, India, September 2013.
8. Li, X. and Yu, W., Synchronization of Ball and Beam Systems with Neural Compensation, Int. J. Automat. Syst., 2010, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 491–496.10.1007/s12555-010-0301-x ↗
9. Naif B. Almutairi and Mohamed Zribi, On the Sliding Mode Control of a Ball on a Beam System, Nonlin. Dynam., 2010, vol. 59, pp. 221–238.10.1007/s11071-009-9534-8 ↗
10. Oh, S.-K., Jang, H.-J., and Pedrycz, W., The Design of a Fuzzy Cascade Controller for Ball and Beam System: A Study in Optimization with the Use of Parallel Genetic Algorithms, Eng. Appl. Artific. Intell., 2009, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 261–271.10.1016/j.engappai.2008.07.003 ↗
11. Banerjee, T., Chowdhuri, S., Sarkar, G., and Bera, J., Performance Comparison between GA and PSO for Optimization of PI and PID Controller of Direct FOC Induction Motor Drive, Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2012, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 2250–3153.
12. Keshmiri, M., Jahromi, A.F., Mohebbi A. Mohammad Hadi Amoozgar, and Wen-Fang Xie, Modelling and Control of Ball and Beam System Using Model Based and Non Model Based Control Approaches, Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst., 2012, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14–35.10.21307/ijssis-2017-468 ↗
13. Eissa, M.M., Virk, G.S., Abdel Ghany, A.M., and Ghith, E.S., Optimum Induction Motor Speed Control Technique Using Genetic Algorithm, Am. J. Intell. Syst., 2013, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
14. Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa, Optimal Design of Fractional-Order PID Controller for Five Bar Linkage Robot Using a New Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Soft. Comput., 2016, vol. 20, pp. 4055–4067.10.1007/s00500-015-1741-2 ↗
15. Mohmoodapadi, M.J., Adljooy Shafaie, A., Bhageri, A., and Nariman Jadeh, N., A Novel Combination of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Parieto Optimal Design of Five-Degree Freedom Vehicle Vibration Model, Appl. Soft Comput., 2013, vol. 13, pp. 2577–2591.10.1016/j.asoc.2012.11.028 ↗