journal article·2018-01

Corotational Finite Element Formulation for Virtual-Reality Based Surgery Simulators

D. Marinković, M. Zehn

Physical Mesomechanics· Volume 21· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Surgical simulation provides a means for trainees to develop surgical competence that encompasses requisite knowledge, technical and cognitive skills and decision-making ability. Considering virtual-reality based surgery simulators, the key requirement is sufficiently accurate and numerically efficient computation of deformation behavior of soft tissues, which is highly nonlinear. The paper offers a simplified geometrically nonlinear corotational finite element formulation to meet the imposed requirements. The approach is used in combination with a rather simple type of finite element and an appropriate solver is chosen for fast computation of dynamical behavior. The finite element formulation is enriched with a coupled-mesh technique to enable modelling of complex geometries by relatively simple computational models. A few examples of models of internal organs are provided to discuss the aspects of the developed tools.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surgical Simulation and Training · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Anatomy and Medical Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Krummel, T.M., Surgical Simulation and Virtual Reality: The Coming Revolution, Ann. Surg., 1998, vol. 228, no. 4, pp. 635–637.10.1097/00000658-199811000-00002 ↗
2. Daw, S., Windso, J., Crega, P., Hewett, P., and Maddern, G., Surgical Simulation for Training: Skills Transfer to the Operating Room: A Systematic Review, Adelaide, South Australia: ASERNIP-S, 2012.
3. Aucar, J.A., Groch, N.R., Troxel, S.A., and Eubanks, S.W., A Review of Surgical Simulation with Attention to Validation Methodology, Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech., 2005, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 82–89.10.1097/01.sle.0000160289.01159.0e ↗
4. Erleben, K., Sporring, J., Henriksen, K., and Dohlmann, H., Physics-Based Animation, Hingham: Charles River Media, 2005.
5. Mosegaard, J., Herborg, P., and Sorensen, T.S., A GPU Accelerated Spring-Mass System for Surgical Simulation, Stud. Health Tech. Inf., 2005, vol. 111, pp. 342–348.
6. Diaz, C.A., Posada, D., Trefftz, H., and Bernal, J., Development of a Surgical Simulator to Training Laparoscopic Procedures, Int. J. Ed. Inf. Tech., 2008, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 95–103.
7. Kawamura, K., Kobayashi, Y., and Fujie, M.G., Basic Study on Real-Time Simulation Using Mass-Spring System for Robotic Surgery, Medical Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Dohi, T., Sakuma, I., and Liao, H., Eds., vol. 5128, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, pp. 311–319.10.1007/978-3-540-79982-5_34 ↗
8. Gao, W., Chu, L., Fu, Y., and Wang, S., A Non-Linear, Anisotropic Mass-Spring Model Based Simulation for Soft Tissue Deformation, 11th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Robors and AmbeintIntelligence (URAI), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE, 2014, pp. 7–11. doi 10.1109URAI.2014. 7057510
9. Nealen, A., Mueller, M., Keiser, R., Boxerman, E., and Carlson, M., Physically Based Deformable Models in Computer Graphics, Comp. Graph. Forum, 2006, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 809–836.10.1111/j.1467-8659.2006.01000.x ↗
10. Bro-Nielsen, M., Finite Element Modeling in Surgery Simulation, Proc. IEEE, 1998, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 490–503.10.1109/5.662874 ↗
11. Razi, H., Birkhold, A.I., Zehn, M., Duda, G.N., Willie, B.M., and Checa, S., A Finite Element Model of In Vivo Mouse Tibial Compression Loading: Influence of Boundary Conditions, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2014, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 195–207.
12. Zhuang, Y., Real-Time Simulation of Physically Realistic Global Deformation: PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of California, 2000.
13. Capell, S., Green, S., Curless, B., Duchamp, T., and Popovic, Z., Interactive Skeleton-Driven Dynamic Deformations, 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH2002, San Antonio, New York: ACM, 2002.
14. Mueller, M., Dorsey, J., McMillan, L., Jagnow, R., and Cutler, B., Stable Real-Time Deformations, 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH 2002, San Antonio, New York: ACM, 2002.
15. Etzmußs, O., Keckeisen, M., and Straßer, W., A Fast Finite Element Solution for Cloth Modelling, Proc. 11th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Pacific Graphics, 2003, Canada, Canmore: IEEE, 2003. doi 10.1109/PCCGA.2003.1238266
16. Comas, O., Taylor, Z.A., Allard, J., Ourselin, S., Cotin, S., and Passenger, J., Efficient Nonlinear FEM for Soft Tissue Modeling and Its GPU Implementation within the Open Source Framework SOFA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bello, F. and Edwards, E., Eds., vol. 5104, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, pp. 28–39.10.1007/978-3-540-70521-5_4 ↗
17. Niroomandi, S., Real-Time Simulation of Surgery by Model Reduction andX-FEM Techniques: PhD Thesis, Group of Structural Mechanics and Material Modeling, University of Saragossa, 2011.
18. Jin, X., Joldes, G.R., Miller, K., Yang, K.H., and Wittek, A., Meshless Algorithm for Soft Tissue Cutting in Surgical Simulation, Comp. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 2014, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 800–811.10.1080/10255842.2012.716829 ↗
19. Bathe, K.J., Finite Element Procedures, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
20. Groesel, M., Gfoehler, M., and Peham, C., Alternative Solution of Virtual Biomodeling Based on CT-scans, J. Biomech., 2009, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 1869–1876.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.007 ↗
21. Marinkovic, D., Zehn, M., and Marinkovic, Z., Finite Element Formulations for Effective Computations of Geometrically Nonlinear Deformations, Adv. Eng. Software, 2012, vol. 50, pp. 3–11.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.04.005 ↗
22. Zehn, M. and Marinkovic, D., Real-Time Simulation of Deformable Structures by Means of Conventional Hardware Tools: Formalisms and Applications, Insights and Innovations in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, SEMC2016, Cape Town, South Africa, London: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2016, pp. 468–474.
23. Felippa, C.A. and Haugen, B., A Unified Formulation of Small-Strain Corotational Finite Elements. Theory, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 2005, vol. 194, no. 21–24, pp. 2285–2335.10.1016/j.cma.2004.07.035 ↗
24. Nguyen, V.A., Zehn, M., and Marinkovic, D., An Efficient Co-Rotational FEM Formulation Using a Projector Matrix, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2016, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 227–240.
25. Hess, M. and Popov, V.L., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction: a User’s Handbook. II. Power-Law Graded Materials, Facta Univer. Mech. Eng., 2016, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 251–268.10.22190/FUME1603251H ↗
26. Popov, V.L. and Heß, M., Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-662-46160-0 ↗