journal article·2022-01

Application of Physical Modeling with the Use of Soft Model Materials for the Analysis and Optimization of Metal Extrusion Processes

M. Hawryluk, M. Suliga, M. Więcław

Physical Mesomechanics· Volume 25· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The study presents the concept of physical modeling together with the characterization of model materials as well as the possibilities of applying this type of physical simulation methods for the analysis, design, and optimization of industrial metal forming processes. The method provides the possibility to define the stress and deformation distribution, to estimate force parameters of the given process, and to localize dead zones and material flow errors. It can also be an alternative or supplementation to finite element modeling. The paper discusses the crucial similarity conditions between the physical model and the real process, which is necessary to transform the results into industrial processes. The developed database of soft model materials was also presented, on the basis of which a model material can be selected for almost any metallic materials. The paper also proposes a new description of the plastic similarity condition, which was verified by the example of two semi-industrial processes (backward and forward extrusion). The study demonstrates the attempt and the results of the influence of the matching of the model materials for three metallic materials, which, at ambient temperature, represent three main types of metal forming processes: hot (lead), warm (reinforced aluminum) and cold working (annealed aluminum). The obtained results showed great usefulness of the proposed condition of plastic similarity, because, in the case of a low value of the similarity coefficient (close to zero), both the flow method and the strength parameters obtained in physical modeling are very similar to the industrial process. On this basis, it can be assumed that by selecting the appropriate model material for the actual metallic material, you can quickly and easily optimize the industrial process with low financial outlays.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Behrens, B.-A., Doegea, E., Reinschb, S., Telkampb, K., Daehndela, H., and Speckerb, A., Precision Forging Processes for High-Duty Automotive Components, J. Mater. Process Technol., 2007, vol. 185, no. 1–3, pp. 39–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.13210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.132 ↗
2. Milutinović, M., Vilotić, D., and Movrin, D., Precision Forging—Tool Concepts and Process Design, J. Technol. Plast., 2008, vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0577-710.1007/s12289-009-0577-7 ↗
3. Gouveia, B.P.P.A., Rodrigues, J.M.C., Martins, P.A.F., and Bay, T., Physical and Numerical Simulation of the Round-to-Square Forward Extrusion, J. Mech. Work. Tech., 2001, vol. 112, pp. 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00725-710.1016/S0924-0136(01)00725-7 ↗
4. Hawryluk, M. and Jakubik, J., Analysis of Forging Defects for Selected Industrial die Forging Processes, Eng. Failure Analys, 2016, vol. 59, pp. 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.00810.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.008 ↗
5. Hawryluk, M., Mrzyglod, B., Gronostajski, Z., Głowacki, M., and Olejarczyk-Wożeńska, I., Application of Artificial Neural Networks in the Analysis of Mechanisms Destroying Forging Tools, Archiv. Metall. Mater., 2020, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 193–200. https://doi.org/10.24425/amm.2019.13111410.24425/amm.2019.131114 ↗
6. Wanheim, T., Physical Modeling of Metal Processing, Danmark: Procestechnics Institut, Danmarks Teknisk Hojkole, 1988.
7. Hawryluk, M., Polak, S., Gronostajski, Z., and Jaśkiewicz, K., Application of Physical Similarity Utilizing Soft Model materials and Numerical Simulations to Analyse the Plastic Flow of UC1 Steel and the Evolution of Forces in a Specific Multi-Operational Industrial Precision Forging Process with a Constant-Velocity Joint Housing, Experimental Tech., 2019, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-018-0288-410.1007/s40799-018-0288-4 ↗
8. Hawryluk, M. and Mrzygłód, B.A., Durability Analysis of Forging Tools for Different Operating Conditions with Application of a Decision Support System Based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Eksploatac. Niezawodność. Maintenance Reliability, 2017, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 338–348. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2017.3.410.17531/ein.2017.3.4 ↗
9. Hawryluk, M., The Influence of the Condition of Plastic Similarity on the Accuracy of Physical Modeling of Extrusion Processes. PhD thesis, Wroclaw: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 2006.
10. Gangopadhyay, T., Kumar, D., and Pratihar, D.I., Expert System to Predict Forging Load and Axial Stress, Appl. Soft Comput., 2014, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.03610.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.036 ↗
11. Mrzyglod, B., Hawryluk, M., Janik, M., and Olejarczyk-Wożeńska, I., Sensitivity Analysis of the Artificial Neural Networks in a System for Durability Prediction of Forging Tools to Forgings Made of C45 Steel, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol., 2020, vol. 109, no. 5–6, pp. 1385–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05641-y10.1007/s00170-020-05641-y ↗
12. Vazquez, V. and Altan, T., New Concepts in Die Design—Physical and Computer Modeling Application, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2000, vol. 98, pp. 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00202-210.1016/S0924-0136(99)00202-2 ↗
13. Wojcik, Ł., Lis, K., and Pater, Z., Plastometric Tests for Plasticine as Physical Model material, Open Eng., 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 653–659. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2016-009310.1515/eng-2016-0093 ↗
14. Gingher, G.C. and Padjen, G., Hot Strip Mill Edging Practices and Plasticine Modeling, ISS-AIME: 34th MWSP Conf. Proc., 1993, vol. 30, pp. 3–12.
15. Shin, H.W. and Naher, S., A Study on the Rolling of I-Section Beams, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., 1994, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90097-310.1016/0890-6955(94)90097-3 ↗
16. Mohammadi, M.M. and Sadeghi, M.H., Simulation and Physical Modeling of Forging Sequence of Bj Type Outer Race International, Adv. Mater. Res., 2010, vol. 83–86, pp. 150–156. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.15010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.150 ↗
17. Sharma, M., Singh, A.K., Singh, P., Pathak, K.K., and Agnihotri, G., Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Die Angle on Extrusion Process Using Plasticine, Exp. Tech., 2010, vol. 35, pp. 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00655.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00655.x ↗
18. Sofuoglu, H. and Gedikli, H., Physical and Numerical Analysis of Three Dimensional Extrusion Process, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2004, vol. 31, no. 1–2, pp. 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2004.02.00110.1016/j.commatsci.2004.02.001 ↗
19. Gronostajski, Z., Hawryluk, M., Kaszuba, M., Niechajowicz, A., Polak, S., Walczak, S., and Jabłoński, D., Analysis of Forging Process of Constant Velocity Joint Body, Steel Res. Int., 2008, vol. 1, pp. 547–554. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10172-011-0059-z10.2478/v10172-011-0059-z ↗
20. Pertence, A.E.M. and Cetlin, P., Similarity of Ductility between Model and Real Materials, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2000, vol. 103, pp. 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00513-610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00513-6 ↗
21. Arentoft, M., Prevention of Defects in Forging by Numerical and Physical Simulation, Tech. Univer. Denmark Inst. Manufact. Eng., 1996.
22. Arentoft, M., Henningsen, P., Bay, N., and Wanheim, T., Simulations of Defects in Metal Forming, J. Mech. Working Technol., 1994, vol. 45, pp. 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(94)90393-X10.1016/0924-0136(94)90393-X ↗
23. Creton, C. and Ciccotti, M., Fracture and Adhesion of Soft Materials: A Review, Rep. Progr. Phys., 2016, vol. 79, no. 4, p. 046601. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/04660110.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046601 ↗
24. Buchely, M.F., Maranon, A. and Silberschmidt, V.V., Material Model for Modeling Clay at High Strain Rates, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2016, vol. 90, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.005 ↗
25. Eckerson, K., Liechty, B., and Sorensen, C., Thermomechanical Similarity between Van Akenplasticine and Metals in Hot-Forming Processes, J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 2008, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1243/03093247JSA36410.1243/03093247JSA364 ↗
26. Xiang, Y., Zhong, D., Rudykh, S., Zhou, H., Qu, S., and Yang, W., A Review of Physically Based and Thermodynamically Based Constitutive Models for Soft Materials, J. Appl. Mech. Transact. ASME, 2020, vol. 87, no. 11, p. 110801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404777610.1115/1.4047776 ↗
27. Gronostajski, Z. and Hawryluk, M., Analysis of Metal Forming Processes by Using Physical Modeling and New Plastic Similarity Condition, AIP Conf. Proc., 2007, vol. 907, pp. 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.272958010.1063/1.2729580 ↗