Effect of Roughness on Capillary Contact Shapes in Tangential Shear: Experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
The paper analyzes the effect of roughness on the shape of contacts of a tangentially moving stainless steel indenter and a silicate glass substrate with a liquid drop in between. The analysis, covering two series of experiments with two indenter radii and five degrees of glass roughness (including smooth-glass), provides measurement data on the normal and tangential contact forces, images of the contacts, and time dependences of their area. In each case considered, the contact boundary at the front and back edge behaves differently with the result that the contact during tangential motion loses its symmetry about the indenter center.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Coulomb, C.A., Theorie des Machines Simple (Theory of Simple Machines), Bachelier: Paris, 1821.
2. Bowden, F.P. and Tabor, D., The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.10.1093/oso/9780198507772.001.0001 ↗
3. Popova, E. and Popov, V.L., The Research Works of Coulomb and Amontons and Generalized Laws of Friction, Friction, 2015, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-015-0074-610.1007/s40544-015-0074-6 ↗
4. Persson, B.N.J., Sliding Friction. Physical Principles and Applications, Heidelberg: Springer, 2002.
5. Popov, V.L., Contact Mechanics and Friction. Physical Principles and Applications, Berlin: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53081-810.1007/978-3-662-53081-8 ↗
6. Macner, A.M. and Steen, P.H., Adaptive Adhesion by a Beetle: Manipulation of Liquid Bridges and Their Breaking Limits, Biointerphases, 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 011001. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.485731510.1116/1.4857315 ↗
7. Li, M., Shi, L., and Wang, X., Physical Mechanisms behind the Wet Adhesion: From Amphibian Toe-Pad to Biomimetics, Colloids Surf. B, 2021, vol. 199, p. 111531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.11153110.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111531 ↗
8. Semprebon, C., McHaleb, G., and Kusumaatmaja, H., Apparent Contact Angle and Contact Angle Hysteresis on Liquid Infused Surfaces, Soft Matter, 2017, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm00920d10.1039/c6sm00920d ↗
9. Gao, L. and McCarthy, T.J., Contact Angle Hysteresis Explained, Langmuir, 2006, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 6234–6237. https://doi.org/10.1021/la060254j10.1021/la060254j ↗
10. Junchao, W., Wu, Y., Cao, Y., Li, G., and Liao, Y., Influence of Surface Roughness on Contact Angle Hysteresis and Spreading Work, Colloid Polym. Sci., 2020, vol. 298, no. 8, pp. 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-020-04680-x10.1007/s00396-020-04680-x ↗
11. Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, M., Hanaor, D.A.H., and Gan, Y., Dynamic Contact Angle Hysteresis in Liquid Bridges, Colloid Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2018, vol. 555, pp. 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.07.00410.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.07.004 ↗
12. Heib, F. and Schmitt, M., Statistical Contact Angle Analyses with the High-Precision Drop Shape Analysis (HPDSA) Approach: Basic Principles and Applications, Coatings, 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings604005710.3390/coatings6040057 ↗
13. Wu, C.-J., Li, Y.-F., Woon, W.-Y., Sheng, Y.-J., and Tsao, H.-K., Contact Angle Hysteresis on Graphene Surfaces and Hysteresis-Free Behavior on Oil-Infused Graphite Surfaces, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, vol. 385, pp. 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.05910.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.059 ↗
14. Hubbe, M.A., Gardner, D.J., and Shen, W., Contact Angles and Wettability of Cellulosic Surfaces: A Review of Proposed Mechanisms and Test Strategies, BioResources, 2015, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 8657–8749.10.15376/biores.10.4.8657-8749 ↗
15. Popov, V.L., Lyashenko, I.A., and Starcevic, J., Shape of a Sliding Capillary Contact Due to the Hysteresis of Contact Angle: Theory and Experiment, Facta Univ. Mech. Eng., 2021, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 175–185. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME201221005P10.22190/FUME201221005P ↗
16. Lyashenko, I.A. and Popov, V.L., The Effect of Contact Duration and Indentation Depth on Adhesion Strength: Experiment and Numerical Simulation, Tech. Phys., 2020, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1695–1707. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378422010012610.1134/S1063784220100126 ↗
17. Lyashenko, I.A. and Pohrt, R., Adhesion between Rigid Indenter and Soft Rubber Layer: Influence of Roughness, Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, vol. 6, p. 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2020.0004910.3389/fmech.2020.00049 ↗
18. Popov, V.L., Lyashenko, I.A., and Starcevic, J., Shape of a Sliding Capillary Contact due to Hysteresis of Contact Angle (Experiment with Indenter R = 33 mm), Suppl. Video, 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13032.4992310.13140/RG.2.2.13032.49923 ↗
19. Popov, V.L., Li, Q., Lyashenko, I.A., and Pohrt, R., Adhesion and Friction in Hard and Soft Contacts: Theory and Experiment, Friction, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 1688–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0482-010.1007/s40544-020-0482-0 ↗
20. Popov, V.L., Lyashenko, I.A., and Starcevic, J., Shape of a Sliding Capillary Contact due to Hysteresis of Contact Angle (Experiment with Indenter R = 100 mm), Suppl. Video, 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33165.1584010.13140/RG.2.2.33165.15840 ↗