Modeling of the Effect of Microscale Morphological Parameters on the Deformation Behavior of Porous Materials with a Metal Matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents results of numerical investigation of the specifics of elastoplastic deformation and damage accumulation in representative volume elements (RVEs) of open-cell and closed-cell porous metal materials under tensile and compressive loads. The Johnson–Cook model was used to describe the elastoplastic behavior and fracture of the aluminum matrix material. Fracture propagation in RVEs of porous media needs to be modeled with explicit consideration for morphological parameters of the internal structure. This feature can be used to form structures with tailored mechanical response using recent advances in additive manufacturing technologies. These technologies, also referred to as 3D printing, provide a free choice of topology by using predetermined digital models that can be optimized before being implemented as real objects. This leads to a task of estimation of the effect of controlled topology on the mechanical behavior of the designed porous structures. The obtained results demonstrate the effect of variation of morphological properties on the elastoplastic behavior and fracture of bicontinuous metal structures under tensile and compressive loads.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Lefebvre, L.-P., Banhart, J., and Dunand, D.C., Porous Metals and Metallic Foams: Current Status and Recent Developments, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2008, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 775–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20080024110.1002/adem.200800241 ↗
2. Matheson, K.E., Cross, K.K., Nowell, M.M., and Spear, A.D., A Multiscale Comparison of Stochastic Open-Cell Aluminum Foam Produced Via Conventional and Additive-Manufacturing Routes, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 707, pp. 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.10210.1016/j.msea.2017.08.102 ↗
3. Ashby, M.F., Evans, A., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W., and Wadley, H.N., Metal Foams: A Design Guide, Mater. Design, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3069(01)00049-810.1016/s0261-3069(01)00049-8 ↗
4. Gorny, B., Niendorf, T., Lackmann, J., Thoene, M., Troester, T., and Maier, H.J., In Situ Characterization of the Deformation and Failure Behavior of Non-Stochastic Porous Structures Processed by Selective Laser Melting, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, vol. 528, no. 27, pp. 7962–7967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.02610.1016/j.msea.2011.07.026 ↗
5. Murr, L.E., Gaytan, S.M., Medina, F., Lopez, H., Martinez, E., Machado, B.I., Hernandez, D.H., Martinez, L., Lopez, M.I., Wicker, R.B., and Bracke, J., Next-Generation Biomedical Implants Using Additive Manufacturing of Complex, Cellular and Functional Mesh Arrays, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2010, vol. 368, no. 1917, pp. 1999–2032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.001010.1098/rsta.2010.0010 ↗
6. Ramirez, D.A., Murr, L.E., Li, S.J., Tian, Y.X., Martinez, E., Martinez, J.L., Machado, B.I., Gaytan, S.M., Medina, F., and Wicker, R.B., Open-Cellular Copper Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing Using Electron Beam Melting, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, vol. 528, no. 16–17, pp. 5379–5386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.05310.1016/j.msea.2011.03.053 ↗
7. Kumar, A., Collini, L., Daurel, A., and Jeng, J.Y., Design and Additive Manufacturing of Closed Cells from Supportless Lattice Structure, Addit. Manuf., 2020, vol. 33, p. 101168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10116810.1016/j.addma.2020.101168 ↗
8. Kadkhodapour, J., Montazerian, H., Samadi, M., Schmauder, S., and Abouei Mehrizi, A., Plastic Deformation and Compressive Mechanical Properties of Hollow Sphere Aluminum Foams Produced by Space Holder Technique, Mater. Design, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.08610.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.086 ↗
9. Gong, L., Kyriakides, S., and Jang, W.Y., Compressive Response of Open-Cell Foams. Part I: Morphology and Elastic Properties, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2005, vol. 42, no. 5–6, pp. 1355–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.023 ↗
10. Jang, W.Y., Kraynik, A.M., and Kyriakides, S., On the Microstructure of Open-Cell Foams and Its Effect on Elastic Properties, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2008, vol. 45, no. 7–8, pp. 1845–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.008 ↗
11. Shunmugasamy, V.C. and Mansoor, B., Compressive Behavior of a Rolled Open-Cell Aluminum Foam, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, vol. 715, pp. 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.01510.1016/j.msea.2018.01.015 ↗
12. Shalimov, A. and Tashkinov, M., Numerical Investigation of Damage Accumulation and Failure Processes in Random Porous Bicontinuous Media, Proc. Struct. Integr., 2020, vol. 25, no. 2019, pp. 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.04410.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.044 ↗
13. Jung, A. and Diebels, S., Microstructural Characterisation and Experimental Determination of a Multiaxial Yield Surface for Open-Cell Aluminium Foams, Mater. Design, 2017, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.01710.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.017 ↗
14. Zhou, J., Allameh, S., and Soboyejo, W.O., Microscale Testing of the Strut in Open Cell Aluminum Foams, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-6100-810.1007/s10853-005-6100-8 ↗
15. Wang, Z., Shen, J., Lu, G., and Zhao, L., Compressive Behavior of Closed-Cell Aluminum Alloy Foams at Medium Strain Rates, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, vol. 528, no. 6, pp. 2326–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.05910.1016/j.msea.2010.12.059 ↗
16. Beets, N., Stuckner, J., Murayama, M., and Farkas, D., Fracture in Nanoporous Gold: An Integrated Computational and Experimental Study, Acta Mater., 2020, vol. 185, pp. 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.00810.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.008 ↗
17. Jiao, J. and Huber, N., Deformation Mechanisms in Nanoporous Metals: Effect of Ligament Shape and Disorder, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2017, vol. 127, pp. 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.03510.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.035 ↗
18. Griffiths, E., Soyarslan, C., Bargmann, S., and Reddy, B.D., Insights into Fracture Mechanisms in Nanoporous Gold and Polymer Impregnated Nanoporous Gold, Extrem. Mech. Lett., 2020, vol. 39, p. 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.10081510.1016/j.eml.2020.100815 ↗
19. Petit, C., Maire, E., Meille, S., and Adrien, J., Two-Scale Study of the Fracture of an Aluminum Foam by X-Ray Tomography and Finite Element Modeling, Mater. Design, 2017, vol. 120, pp. 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.009 ↗
20. Vengatachalam, B., Poh, L.H., Liu, Z.S., Qin, Q.H., and Swaddiwudhipong, S., Three Dimensional Modelling of Closed-Cell Aluminium Foams with Predictive Macroscopic Behaviour, Mech. Mater., 2019, vol. 136, no. 5, p. 103067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10306710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103067 ↗
21. Zhang, Y., Jin, T., Li, S., Ruan, D., Wang, Z., and Lu, G., Sample Size Effect on the Mechanical Behavior of Aluminum Foam, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2019, vol. 151, no. 08-2018, pp. 622–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.12.01910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.12.019 ↗
22. Tashkinov, M.A., Multipoint Stochastic Approach to Localization of Microscale Elastic Behavior of Random Heterogeneous Media, Comput. Struct., 2021, vol. 249, p. 106474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.10647410.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106474 ↗
23. Tashkinov, M., Statistical Characteristics of Structural Stochastic Stress and Strain Fields in Polydisperse Heterogeneous Solid Media, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2014, vol. 94(C), pp. 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.05010.1016/j.commatsci.2014.01.050 ↗
24. Johnson, G.R. and Cook, W.H., Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains, Strain Rates, Temperatures and Pressures, Eng. Fract. Mech., 1985, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
25. Cao, Y., Di, H.S., Misra, R.D.K., and Zhang, J., Hot Deformation Behavior of Alloy 800H at Intermediate Temperatures: Constitutive Models and Microstructure Analysis, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-1220-410.1007/s11665-014-1220-4 ↗
26. Bargmann, S., Klusemann, B., Markmann, J., Schnabel, J.E., Schneider, K., Soyarslan, C., and Wilmers, J., Generation of 3D Representative Volume Elements for Heterogeneous Materials: A Review, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2018, vol. 96, pp. 322–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.02.003 ↗
27. Lesuer, D.R., Kay, G.J., and LeBlanc, M.M., Modeling Large Strain, High Rate Deformation in Metals, in Proceedings of the TMS Fall Meeting, 2001, pp. 75–86.