Metallurgical Characterization of Co-Cr-Mo Parts Processed by a Hybrid Manufacturing Technology
Source abstract
Abstract
The additive manufacturing technology offers new and incredible opportunities in the design of components. Nowadays, structural integrity assessment of additively manufactured components is a formidable challenge that needs to be faced out in order to allow such components to be launched in the market. One of the major drawbacks of additive manufacturing is poor surface finish and loose geometrical tolerance of built parts. In this scenario, hybrid manufacturing, which takes advantage of both subtractive and additive manufacturing, can be considered as a solution worthy of investigation in view of possible applications to save costs and time in the component production. The present work is aimed at assessing microstructural properties of Co-Cr-Mo specimens manufactured by the hybrid subtractive/additive technology, when the additive part is built over the machined one. The results show an excellent metallurgical coupling at the interface between the two differently processed parts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Mukherjee, T., Zuback, J.S., De DebRoy, A., and DebRoy, T., Printability of Alloys for Additive Manufacturing, Sci. Rep., 2016, vol. 6, pp. 19717. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1971710.1038/srep19717 ↗
2. Günther, J., Brenne, F., Droste, M., Wendler, M., Volkova, O., Biermann, H., and Niendorf, T., Design of Novel Materials for Additive Manufacturing—Isotropic Microstructure and High Defect Tolerance, Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, pp. 1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19376-010.1038/s41598-018-19376-0 ↗
3. Gokuldoss, K.P., Design of Next-Generation Alloys for Additive Manufacturing, Mater. Design Process Comm., 2019, vol. 1, p. e50. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.5010.1002/mdp2.50 ↗
4. Ferro, P., Savio, G., Meneghello, R., and Berto, F., A Modified Volumetric Energy Density-Based Approach for Porosity Assessment in Additive Manufacturing Process Design, Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Tech., 2020, vol. 110, pp. 1911–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05949-910.1007/s00170-020-05949-9 ↗
5. Ferro, P., Berto, F., and Romanin, L., Understanding Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Phenomena via Numerical Simulation, Frat. Int. Strut., 2020, vol. 14, no. 53, pp. 252–284. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.2110.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.21 ↗
6. Ferro, P., Fabrizi, A., Berto, F., Savio, G., Meneghello, R., and Rosso, S., Defects as a Root Cause of Fatigue Weakening of Additively Manufactured AlSi10Mg Components, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2020, vol. 108, p. 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10261110.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102611 ↗
7. Ferro, P., Meneghello, R., Razavi, S.M.J., Berto, F., and Savio, G., Porosity Inducing Process Parameters in Selective Laser Melted AlSi10Mg Aluminium Alloy, Phys. Mesomech., 2020, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102995992003010810.1134/S1029959920030108 ↗
8. Peron, M., Torgersen, J., Ferro, P., and Berto, F., Fracture Behavior of Notched As-Built EBM Parts: Characterization and Interplay between Defects and Notch Strengthening Behaviour, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2018, vol. 98, pp. 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.10.00410.1016/j.tafmec.2018.10.004 ↗
9. Razavi, S.M.J., Ferro, P., Berto, F., and Torgersen, J., Fatigue Strength of Blunt V-Notched Specimens Produced by Selective Laser Melting of Ti-6Al-4V, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2018, vol. 97, pp. 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.02110.1016/j.tafmec.2017.06.021 ↗
10. Razavi, S.M.J., Bordonaro, G.G., Ferro, P., Torgersen, J., and Berto, F., Fatigue Behavior of Porous Ti-6Al-4V Made by Laser-Engineered Net Shaping, Materials, 2018, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 284–292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1102028410.3390/ma11020284 ↗
11. Razavi, S.M.J., Ferro, P., and Berto, F., Fatigue Assessment of Ti–6Al–4V Circular Notched Specimens Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Metals, 2017, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 291–301. https://doi.org/10.3390/met708029110.3390/met7080291 ↗
12. Bhavar, V., Kattire, P., Patil, V., Khot, S., Gujar, K., and Singh, R., A Review on Powder Bed Fusion Technology of Metal Additive Manufacturing in 4th Int. Conf. Exh. Additive Manufact. Tech.-AM-2014, September 2014, p. 1–2.
13. Tan, C.L., Zhou, K.S., Tong, X., Huang, Y.S., Li, J., Ma, W.Y., et al., Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 18Ni-300 Maraging Steel Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting in Proc. 2016 6th Int. Conf. Advanc. Design Manufact. Eng., Jiang, Z.Y., Ed., 2016, pp. 404–410.10.2991/icadme-16.2016.66 ↗
14. Tan, C., Zhou, K., Ma, W., Zhang, P., Liu, M., and Kuang, T., Microstructural Evolution, Nanoprecipitation Behavior and Mechanical Properties of Selective Laser Melted High-Performance Grade 300 Maraging Steel, Mater. Des., 2017, vol. 134, pp. 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.02610.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.026 ↗
15. Kruth, J.P., Leu, M.C., and Nakagawa, T., Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping, CIRP Annals-Manuf. Tech., 1998, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5 ↗
16. Du, W., Bai, Q., and Zhang, B., A Novel Method for Additive/Subtractive Hybrid Manufacturing of Metallic Parts in Proc. Manuf., 2016, vol. 5, pp. 1018–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.06710.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.067 ↗
17. Grzesik, W., Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials, Theory, Modelling, and Applications, Amsterdam: Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-444-63711-6.
18. Zhu, Z., Dhokia, V.G., Nassehi, A., and Newman, S.T., A Review of Hybrid Manufacturing Processes, Int. J. Comp. Integr. Manuf., 2013, vol. 26, pp. 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2012.74953010.1080/0951192X.2012.749530 ↗
19. Kasperovich, G. and Hausmann, J., Improvement of Fatigue Resistance and Ductility of TiAl6V4 Processed by Selective Laser Melting, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2015, vol. 220, pp. 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.02510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.025 ↗
20. Yamazaki, T., Development of a Hybrid Multi-Tasking Machine Tool: Integration of Additive Technology with CNC Machining in Proc. CIRP, 2016, vol. 42, pp. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.19310.1016/j.procir.2016.02.193 ↗
21. Grzesik, W., Hybrid Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Processes and Systems: A Review, J. Machine Eng., 2018, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.762910.5604/01.3001.0012.7629 ↗
22. Li, L., Repair of Directionally Solidified Superalloy GTD-111 by Laser-Engineered Net Shaping, J. Mater. Sci., 2006, vol. 41, pp. 7886–7893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0948-010.1007/s10853-006-0948-0 ↗
23. Song, J., Deng, Q., Chen, C., Hu, D., and Li, Y., Rebuilding of Metal Components with Laser Cladding Forming, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, vol. 252, pp. 7934–7940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.10.02510.1016/j.apsusc.2005.10.025 ↗
24. Sexton, L., Lavin, S., Byrne, G., and Kennedy, A., Laser Cladding of Aerospace Materials, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2002, vol. 122, pp. 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01121-910.1016/S0924-0136(01)01121-9 ↗
25. Gill, D.D., Smugeresky, J.E., Harris, M.F., Robino, C.V., and Griffith, M.L., On the Interface between LENS® Deposited Stainless Steel 304L Repair Geometry and Cast or Machined Components, Sandia Report, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/700910.2172/919107 ↗
26. Kim, H., Cong, W., Zhang, H.-C., and Liu, Z., Laser Engineered Net Shaping of Nickel-Based Superalloy Inconel 718 Powders onto AISI 4140 Alloy Steel Substrates: Interface Bond and Fracture Failure Mechanism, Materials, 2017. vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 341–358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1004034110.3390/ma10040341 ↗
27. Tan, C., Zhou, K., Ma, W., and Min, L., Interfacial characteristic and Mechanical Performance of Maraging Steel-Copper Functional Bimetal Produced by Selective Laser Melting Based Hybrid Manufacture, Mater. Des., 2018, vol. 155, pp. 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.06410.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.064 ↗
28. Cyr, E., Asgari, H., Shamsdini, S., Purdy, M., Hosseinkhani, K., and Mohammadi, M., Fracture Behaviour of Additively Manufactured MS1-H13 Hybrid Hard Steels, Mater. Lett., 2018, vol. 212, pp. 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.09710.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.097 ↗
29. Azizi, H., Ghiaasiaan, R., Prager, R., Ghoncheh, M.H., Samk, K.A., Lausic, A., Byleveld, W., and Phillion, A.B., Metallurgical and Mechanical Assessment of Hybrid Additively-Manufactured Maraging Tool Steels via Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 27, pp. 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.02510.1016/j.addma.2019.03.025 ↗
30. Shakerin, S., Hadadzadeh, A., Amirkhiz, B.S., Shamsdini, S., Li, J., and Mohammadi, M., Additive Manufacturing of Maraging Steel-H13 Bimetals Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion Technique, Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 29, p. 100797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10079710.1016/j.addma.2019.100797 ↗
31. Schaub, A., Juechter, V., Singer, R.F., and Merklein, M., Characterization of Hybrid Components Consisting of SEBM Additive Structures and Sheet Metal of Alloy Ti-6Al-4V, Key Eng. Mater., 2014, pp. 609–614. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.60910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.609 ↗
32. Ahuja, B., Schaub, A., Karg, M., Schmidt, R., Merklein, M., and Schmidt, M., High Power Laser Beam Melting of Ti-6Al-4V on Formed Sheet Metal to Achieve Hybrid Structures, Laser 3D Manuf., 2015, p. 93530X. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.208291910.1117/12.2082919 ↗
33. Huber, F., Papke, T., Kerkien, M., Tost, F., Geyer, G., Merklein, M., and Schmidt, M., Customized Exposure Strategies for Manufacturing Hybrid Parts by Combining Laser Beam Melting and Sheet Metal Forming, J. Laser Appl., 2019, vol. 31, p. 22318. https://doi.org/10.2351/7.000402810.2351/7.0004028 ↗
34. Butzhammer, L., Dubjella, P., Huber, F., Schaub, A., Aumüller, M., Petrunenko, O., Merklein, M., and Schmidt, M., Experimental Investigation of a Process Chain Combining Sheet Metal Bending and Laser Beam Melting of Ti-6Al-4V, Lasers Manufact., 2017.
35. Tan, C., Zhou, K., Ma, W., and Min, L., Interfacial Characteristic and Mechanical Performance of Maraging Steel-Copper Functional Bimetal Produced by Selective Laser Melting Based Hybrid Manufacture, Mater. Des., 2018, vol. 155, pp. 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.06410.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.064 ↗
36. Altıparmak, S.C., Yardley, V.A., Shi, Z., and Lin, J., Challenges in Additive Manufacturing of High-Strength Aluminium Alloys and Current Developments in Hybrid Additive Manufacturing, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 2021, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.12.00410.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.12.004 ↗
37. Merklein, M., Schulte, R., and Papke, T., An Innovative Process Combination of Additive Manufacturing and Sheet Bulk Metal Forming for Manufacturing a Functional Hybrid Part, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2020, vol. 291, pp. 117032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11703210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117032 ↗
38. Dolev, O., Osovski, S., and Shirizly, A., Ti-6Al-4V Hybrid Structure Mechanical Properties—Wrought and Additive Manufactured Powder-Bed Material, Additive Manuf., 2021, vol. 37, p. 101657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165710.1016/j.addma.2020.101657 ↗
39. Papke, T. and Merklein, M., Processing of 316L Hybrid Parts Consisting of Sheet Metal and Additively Manufactured Element by Powder Bed Fusion Using a Laser Beam, Proc. CIRP, 2020, vol. 94, pp. 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.09.00810.1016/j.procir.2020.09.008 ↗
40. Meiners, F., Ihne, J., Jürgens, P., Hemes, S., Mathes, M., Sizova, I., Bambach, M., Hama-Saleh, R., Weisheit, A., New Hybrid Manufacturing Routes Combining Forging and Additive Manufacturing to Efficiently Produce High Performance Components From Ti-6Al-4V, Proc. Manuf., 2020, vol. 47, pp. 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.21510.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.215 ↗
41. Tan, C., Zhou, K., Ma, W., and Min, L., Interfacial Characteristic and Mechanical Performance of Maraging Steel-Copper Functional Bimetal Produced by Selective Laser Melting Based Hybrid Manufacture, Mater. Design, 2018, vol. 155, pp. 77–85.10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.064 ↗
42. Osipovich, K.S., Astafurova, E.G., Chumaevskii, A.V., Kalashnikov, K.N., Astafurov, S.V., Maier, G.G., Melnikov, E.V., Moskvina, V.A., Panchenko, M.Yu., Tarasov, S.Yu., Rubtsov, V.E., and Kolubaev, E.A., Gradient Transition Zone Structure in “Steel–Copper” Sample Produced by Double Wire-Feed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing, J. Mater. Sci., 2020, vol. 55, pp. 9258–9272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-04549-y10.1007/s10853-020-04549-y ↗
43. Azizi, H., Ghiaasiaan, R., Prager, R., Ghoncheh, M.H., Samk, K.A., Lausic, A., Byleveld, W., and Phillion, A.B., Metallurgical and Mechanical Assessment of Hybrid Additively-Manufactured T Maraging Tool Steels via Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2019, vol. 27, pp. 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.02510.1016/j.addma.2019.03.025 ↗
44. Ahuja, B., Schaub, A., Karg, M., Lechner, M., Merklein, M., and Schmidt, M., Developing LBM Process Parameters for Ti-6Al-4V Thin Wall Structures and Determining the Corresponding Mechanical Characteristics, Phys. Proc., 2014, vol. 56, pp. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.10210.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.102 ↗
45. Schaub, A., Ahuja, B., Ahuja, B., Butzhammer, L., Osterziel, J., and Merklein, M., Additive Manufacturing of Functional Elements on Sheet Metal, Phys. Proc., 2016, vol. 83, pp. 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.08210.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.082 ↗
46. Schaub, A., Ahuja, B., Karg, M., Schmidt, M., and Merklein, M., Fabrication and Characterization of Laser Beam Melted Ti-6Al-4V Geometries on Sheet Metal in DDMC 2014 Fraunhofer Direct Digital Manufacturing Conference At, Berlin, 2014, pp. 1–5.
47. Schaub, A., Juechter, V., Singer, R.F., and Merklein, M., Characterization of Hybrid Components Consisting of SEBM Additive Structures and Sheet Metal of Alloy Ti-6Al-4V, Key Eng. Mater., 2014, vol. 611–612, pp. 609–614. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.60910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.609 ↗
48. Revilla-León, M., Sadeghpour, M., and Özcan, M., A Review of the Applications of Additive Manufacturing Technologies Used to Fabricate Metals in Implant Dentistry, J. Prosthodontics, 2020, vol. 29, pp. 579–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.1321210.1111/jopr.13212 ↗
49. Mangano, F., Chambrone, L., van Noort, R., Miller, C., Hatton, P., and Mangano, C., Direct Metal Laser Sintering Titanium Dental Implants: A Review of the Current Literature, Int. J. Biomater., 2014, p. 461534. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/46153410.1155/2014/461534 ↗
50. Silva, M., Felismina, R., Mateus, A., Parreira, P., and Malça, C., Application of a Hybrid Additive Manufacturing Methodology to Produce a Metal/Polymer Customized Dental Implant, Proc. Manuf., 2017, vol. 12, pp. 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.01910.1016/j.promfg.2017.08.019 ↗
51. Xiang, D.D., Wang, P., Tan, X.P., Chandra, S., Wang, C., Nai, M.L.S., Tor, S.B., Liu, W.Q., and Liu, E., Anisotropic Micro-structure and Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Co–Cr–Mo Alloy Using Selective Electron Beam Melting for Orthopedic Implants, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, vol. 765, p. 138270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.13827010.1016/j.msea.2019.138270 ↗
52. Sun, S.-H., Koizumi, Y., Kurosu, S., Li, Y.-P., Matsumoto, H., Chiba, A., Build Direction Dependence of Microstructure and High-Temperature Tensile Property of Co–Cr–Mo Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Melting, Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 64, pp. 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.01710.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.017 ↗
53. Sun, S.-H., Koizumi, Y., Kurosu, S., Li, Y.-P., and Chiba, A., Phase and Grain Size Inhomogeneity and Their Influences on Creep Behavior of Co–Cr–Mo Alloy Additive Manufactured by Electron Beam Melting, Acta Mater., 2015, vol. 86, pp. 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.01210.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.012 ↗
54. Milošev, I., CoCrMo Alloy for Biomedical Applications, Biomedical Applications in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry. V. 55, Djokić, S., Ed., Boston: Springer, 2012.10.1007/978-1-4614-3125-1_1 ↗
55. Mantrala, K.M., Das, M., Balla, V.K., Rao, C.S., and Kesava Rao, V.V.S., Additive Manufacturing of Co-Cr-Mo Alloy: Influence of Heat Treatment on Microstructure, Tribological, and Electrochemical Properties, Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, vol. 1, p. 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2015.0000210.3389/fmech.2015.00002 ↗
56. Tan, X.P., Wang, P., Kok, Y., Toh, W.Q., Sun, Z., Nai, S.M.L., Descoins, M., Mangelinck, D., Liu, E., and Tor, S.B., Carbide Precipitation Characteristics in Additive Manufacturing of Co-Cr-Mo Alloy via Selective Election Beam Melting, Scripta Mater., 2018, vol. 143, pp. 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.09.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.09.022 ↗
57. Razavi, S.M.J., Avanzini, A., Cornacchia, G., Giorleo, L., and Berto, F., Effect of Heat Treatment on Fatigue Behavior of As-Built Notched Co-Cr-Mo Parts Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Int. J. Fatigue, 2021, vol. 142, p. 105926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10592610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105926 ↗
58. Haan, J., Asseln, M., Zivcec, M., Eschweiler, J., Radermacher, R., and Broeckmann, C., Effect of Subsequent Hot Isostatic Pressing on Mechanical Properties of ASTM F75 Alloy Produced by Selective Laser Melting, Powder Metallurgy, 2015, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1179/0032589915Z.00000000023610.1179/0032589915Z.000000000236 ↗
59. Suwas, S. and Ray, R.K., Crystallographic Texture of Materials, Engineering Materials and Processes, London: Springer-Verlag, 2014.10.1007/978-1-4471-6314-5 ↗
60. Zhao, Y., Koizumi, Y., Aoyagi, K., Wei, D., Yamanaka, K., and Chiba, A., Comprehensive Study on Mechanisms for Grain Morphology Evolution and Texture Development in Powder Bed Fusion with Electron Beam of Co–Cr–Mo Alloy, Materialia, 2019, vol. 6, p. 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10034610.1016/j.mtla.2019.100346 ↗