journal article·2016-09Open access

Fluorescence excitation by enhanced plasmon upconversion under continuous wave illumination

Mehmet Emre Tasgin, Ildar Salakhutdinov, Dania Kendziora, Musa Kurtulus Abak, Deniz Turkpence, Luca Piantanida, Ljiljana Fruk, Marco Lazzarino, Alpan Bek

Abstract

We demonstrate effective background-free continuous wave nonlinear optical excitation of molecules that are sandwiched between asymmetrically constructed plasmonic gold nanoparticle clusters. We observe that near infrared photons are converted to visible photons through efficient plasmonic second harmonic generation. Our theoretical model and simulations demonstrate that Fano resonances may be responsible for being able to observe nonlinear conversion using a continuous wave light source. We show that nonlinearity enhancement of plasmonic nanostructures via coupled quantum mechanical oscillators such as molecules can be several orders larger as compared to their classical counterparts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Browne · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2009 · 60 · 40710.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090423 ↗
2. Xiang · 2012
3. Xu · Science · 2003 · 301 · 122110.1126/science.1087481 ↗
4. Gourdon · Eur. J. Org. Chem. · 1998 · 1998 · 279710.1002/(SICI)1099-0690(199812)1998:12<2797::AID-EJOC2797>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
5. Bautista · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 320710.1021/nl301190x ↗
6. Kauranen · Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 73710.1038/nphoton.2012.244 ↗
7. Girling · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 19 · 206510.1088/0022-3727/19/11/006 ↗
8. Palomba · J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. · 2009 · 11 · 11403010.1088/1464-4258/11/11/114030 ↗
9. Neacsu · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 7110.1103/PhysRevB.71.201402 ↗
10. Ginzburg · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 08542210.1103/PhysRevB.86.085422 ↗
11. Manjavacas · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 231810.1021/nl200579f ↗
12. Artuso · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 210610.1021/nl800921z ↗
13. Waks · Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 82 · 04384510.1103/PhysRevA.82.043845 ↗
14. Weis · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 2357310.1364/OE.19.023573 ↗
15. Taşgın · Nanoscale · 2010 · 5 · 861610.1039/c3nr02270f ↗
16. Classical analog of electromagnetically induced transparency10.1119/1.1412644 ↗
17. Tassin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 05390110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.053901 ↗
18. Butet · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 07543010.1103/PhysRevB.86.075430 ↗
19. Thyagarajan · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 184710.1021/nl400636z ↗
20. Berthelot · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 1049810.1364/OE.20.010498 ↗
21. Walsh · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 311110.1021/nl401037n ↗
22. Liu · ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 144210.1021/acsnano.5b06956 ↗
23. Yildiz · J. Opt. · 2015 · 17 · 12500510.1088/2040-8978/17/12/125005 ↗
24. Czaplicki · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 15 · 53010.1021/nl503901e ↗
25. Chen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1981 · 46 · 14510.1103/PhysRevLett.46.145 ↗
26. Türkpençe · J. Opt. · 2014 · 16 · 10500910.1088/2040-8978/16/10/105009 ↗
27. Singh · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 12570110.1088/0957-4484/24/12/125701 ↗
28. Taşgın · 2014
29. Singh · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 03541010.1103/PhysRevB.93.035410 ↗
30. Finazzi · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 03542810.1103/PhysRevB.86.035428 ↗
31. Hohenester · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2012 · 183 · 37010.1016/j.cpc.2011.09.009 ↗
32. Storhoff · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1998 · 120 · 195910.1021/ja972332i ↗
33. Haiss · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 421510.1021/ac0702084 ↗
34. Turkevich · Faraday Soc. · 1951 · 11 · 5510.1039/df9511100055 ↗
35. Enüstün · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1963 · 85 · 331710.1021/ja00904a001 ↗
36. Ojea-Jimenez · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 180010.1021/jp9091305 ↗
37. Kimling · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1570010.1021/jp061667w ↗
38. Hazarika · Angew. Chem. · 2006 · 110 · 682710.1002/anie.200602049 ↗
39. Kukolka · Org. Biomol. Chem. · 2004 · 2 · 220310.1039/B406492E ↗
40. Niemeyer · Angew. Chem. · 2003 · 42 · 576610.1002/anie.200352744 ↗
41. Blab · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 350 · 7110.1016/S0009-2614(01)01282-9 ↗
42. Nordlander · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 89910.1021/nl049681c ↗
43. Günendi · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 1834410.1364/OE.21.018344 ↗
44. Grosse · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 13680210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.136802 ↗
45. Bouhelier · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 26740510.1103/PhysRevLett.95.267405 ↗
46. In our experiment, SHG is reported to far-field by fluorescent molecules.
47. Pelton · 2013
48. In the simulation, we considered only the plasmonic particles, the 3 AuNPs. EYFP molecules are not included in the simulation.
49. In Fig. 7, the 1064nm E-field on top of the 12nm AuNP, which is generated by the charges on the surfaces of the 110nm and 60nm AuNPs, also helps the induction of SH conversion on the 12nm AuNP.
50. Ginzburg · ACS Photonics · 2014 · 2 · 810.1021/ph500362y ↗
51. At/near this resonance (λ1=400nm) there could be other modes, other than quadrupole profile. This would not affect the description much. Because SHG can emerge to the quadrupole mode.
52. EYFP is only weakly excited since the generated SH field is very very weak.
53. We cannot be sure if the 4nm shift in 1-photon florescence of EYFP emerges from EYFP-AuNP coupling, due to calibration of our experiment and setup in Ref. [55], or because of the presence of solution in Ref. [55]. The two spectra appear as the shifted form of each other. We cannot observe an differentiation in the two curves indicating EYFP-AuNP hybridization. Note that, for the emergence of Fano resonance a weaker coupling, not introducing hybridization, is enough.
54. When the total excitation energy (2ω) is shifted up relative to the 2-photon absorption level, the vibrational/rotational states of the molecule can help the 2-photon process. However, when 2ω is shifted down compared to the final 2-photon level, energy conservation works again the 2-photon absorption process.
55. Spiess · J. Microsc. · 2005 · 217 · 20010.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01437.x ↗
56. Piantanida · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 478910.1039/C5CC00778J ↗
57. Senet · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 105 · 647110.1063/1.472498 ↗
58. Lohner · Surf. Sci. · 1999 · 422 · 1710.1016/S0039-6028(98)00834-6 ↗
59. Schaich · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 1047810.1103/PhysRevB.61.10478 ↗
60. Bachelier · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 23540310.1103/PhysRevB.82.235403 ↗
61. Liebsch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 61 · 123310.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1233 ↗
62. Gullans · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 24740110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.247401 ↗
63. Thongrattanasiri · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.187401 ↗
64. Zhang · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 442410.1038/ncomms5424 ↗