journal article·2022-10-03

A comparative study of flow instability criteria in the processing map of AlFeCoNiMo0.2 high-entropy alloys

Jianlin Li, Jinke Han, Fance Song, Haoyu Zhang, Ge Zhou, Lijia Chen, Xue Cao

Philosophical Magazine Letters· Volume 102· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

High-entropy alloys (HEAs) were studied via hot compression experiments using a Gleeble-3800 thermal simulation tester. The hot deformation behaviour of an AlFeCoNiMo0.2 HEA and the physical significance of the associated parameters were analyzed according to the Prasad, Gegel, Malas, and Murty instability criteria. Processing maps of different instability criteria under different conditions were constructed. The domain corresponding to a temperature range of 1070°C–1150°C with a strain rate range of 0.001–0.1 s−1 and average power dissipation rates of >40% did not feature flow instability; thus, this domain is appropriate for the AlFeCoNiMo0.2 HEA deformation process. Through microstructure analysis, it was determined that the deformation mechanism in the optimal forming region is dynamic recrystallization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Entropy Alloys Studies · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, People’s Republic of China

Science and Technology on Advanced High Temperature Structural Materials Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.25710.1016/j.msea.2003.10.257 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800251-3.00002-X10.1016/B978-0-12-800251-3.00002-X ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.08110.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.081 ↗
4. Lu Y. · Sci. Rep · 2014 · 4 · 1
5. 10.1080/21663831.2014.98585510.1080/21663831.2014.985855 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.08.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.08.017 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.02610.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.32010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.320 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.18810.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.188 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.01310.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.013 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11837-014-1066-010.1007/s11837-014-1066-0 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0266490210.1007/BF02664902 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.02810.1016/j.msea.2009.04.028 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.11310.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.113 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00782-X10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00782-X ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.03210.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.032 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.03110.1016/j.msea.2014.10.031 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16010210.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160102 ↗
19. Liu M. · Metal · 2022 · 12 · 2
20. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-010.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.170736310.1063/1.1707363 ↗
22. Dong F. · J. Alloy. Compd · 2020 · 126 · 106921
23. 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90006-710.1016/0020-7403(84)90006-7 ↗
24. Malas J.C. · TMS · 1992 · 44 · 8
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.08910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.089 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01647-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01647-1 ↗