journal article·2014-09-02

Flaw tolerance promoted by dissipative deformation mechanisms between material building blocks

Tuukka Verho, Markus J. Buehler

Philosophical Magazine Letters· Volume 94· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

AbstractNovel high-performance composite materials often draw inspiration from natural materials such as bone or mollusc shells. A prime feature of such composites is that they are, like their natural counterparts, quasibrittle. They are tolerant to material flaws up to a certain characteristic flaw-tolerant size scale, exhibiting high strength and toughness, but start to behave in a brittle manner when sufficiently large flaws are present. Here, we establish that better flaw tolerance can be achieved by maximizing fracture toughness relative to the maximum elastic energy available in the material, and we demonstrate this concept with simple two-dimensional coarse-grained simulations where the transition from brittle to quasibrittle behaviour is examined.Keywords: flaw tolerancecoarse-grained simulationquasibrittlenessdissipationfracture toughness AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge funding from Fulbright Center Finland and The Federation of Finnish Technology Industries. Further support was provided by AFOSR and NSF.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Bažant Z.P. · Taylor & Francis · 2002
2. Anderson T.L. · 200510.1201/9781420058215 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl203108t10.1021/nl203108t ↗
4. 10.1088/0965-0393/14/5/00110.1088/0965-0393/14/5/001 ↗
5. 10.1039/c1cs15106a10.1039/c1cs15106a ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.v24.1410.1002/adma.v24.14 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.05.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.00210.1016/j.jmps.2011.03.002 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat311510.1038/nmat3115 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.01210.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.012 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.040409610110.1073/pnas.0404096101 ↗
13. 10.1080/0001873030074151810.1080/00018730300741518 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2013.8810.1557/jmr.2013.88 ↗
15. 10.1002/(ISSN)1521-409510.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095 ↗
16. L.S. Dimas, T. Giesa and M.J. Buehler, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 63 (2014) p.481.10.1016/j.jmps.2013.07.006 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10704-008-9306-310.1007/s10704-008-9306-3 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep0003510.1038/srep00035 ↗
19. 10.1080/1478643041233128038210.1080/14786430412331280382 ↗
20. 10.1529/biophysj.105.06934410.1529/biophysj.105.069344 ↗
21. 10.1021/nn204506d10.1021/nn204506d ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.00410.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90155-X10.1016/0013-7944(87)90155-X ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.03610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.036 ↗
25. 10.1557/JMR.1990.154910.1557/JMR.1990.1549 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.02550110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.025501 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.07541210.1103/PhysRevB.75.075412 ↗