journal article·2014-09-02

Strain rate sensitivity of bulk multi-phase nanocrystalline Al–W-based alloy

Sreedevi Varam, P.V.S.L. Narayana, Muvva D. Prasad, D. Chakravarty, Koteswararao V. Rajulapati, K. Bhanu Sankara Rao

Philosophical Magazine Letters· Volume 94· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

High-energy ball milling of conventional coarse-grained aluminium and nanocrystalline W in an Al-10 at.%W composition results in the formation of a two-phase mixture of Al and W with nanocrystalline features. Subsequent compaction of these powders using spark plasma sintering (SPS) at 748 K resulted in the formation of an Al12W phase in the nanocrystalline aluminium matrix. It is suggested that the mere attainment of nanocrystallinity was not enough to trigger a reaction between Al and W to form Al12W but that sufficient thermal activation was also required, as supplied during SPS. The second-phase particles (~175 nm in size) are uniformly distributed in the nanocrystalline Al matrix having a grain size of ~40 nm. The nanocomposite possessed a high hardness of 5.42 ± 0.33 GPa and an elastic modulus of 145 ± 5 GPa, both measured using depth-sensing nanoindentation. At room temperature, this novel nanocomposite exhibited a strain rate sensitivity (SRS) of 0.024 ± 0.001 and an activation volume in the range of 3.78–3.88 b3. Interfacial regions, viz. grain boundaries and triple junctions in the matrix and the reinforcement, matrix/particle boundaries, etc. could be influential factors in deciding the SRS and the activation volume. A scanning probe microscope image of the nanoindent shows a plastic flow region around the periphery of the indent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-007-0042-310.1007/s11837-007-0042-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.13210.1016/j.msea.2007.04.132 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.05110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.03.051 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11661-008-9593-310.1007/s11661-008-9593-3 ↗
5. 10.1557/S088376940005155110.1557/S0883769400051551 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.03210.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-410.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-4 ↗
9. 10.1073/pnas.061109710410.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat114110.1038/nmat1141 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.11610.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.116 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.06410.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064 ↗
13. 10.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-610.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6 ↗
14. Cullity B.D. · 1956
15. 10.1179/imr.1995.40.2.4110.1179/imr.1995.40.2.41 ↗
16. 10.1179/imr.1998.43.3.10110.1179/imr.1998.43.3.101 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.02110.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.021 ↗
18. 10.2320/matertrans.L-M201184710.2320/matertrans.L-M2011847 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.05410.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.054 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.04510.1016/j.msea.2008.12.045 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.01010.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.04.010 ↗
22. Tabor D. · J. Inst. Metals · 1951 · 79 · 1
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.21410.1016/j.msea.2003.10.214 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01138-110.1016/S1359-6462(01)01138-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.04210.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.042 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.02510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.025 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.00510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.005 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.02810.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.028 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11661-014-2425-810.1007/s11661-014-2425-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.04710.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
31. Chinh N.Q. · Mater. Sci. For. · 2011 · 667 · 677
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.05610.1016/j.msea.2012.02.056 ↗
33. 10.1557/JMR.2002.000210.1557/JMR.2002.0002 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.02410110.1103/PhysRevB.66.024101 ↗