journal article·2020-10-02

Constitutive equation for describing true stress–strain curves over a large range of strains

Jun Cao, Fuguo Li, Weifeng Ma, Dongfeng Li, Ke Wang, Junjie Ren, Hailiang Nie, Wei Dang

Philosophical Magazine Letters· Volume 100· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Full-range strain hardening behaviour, containing the post-necking stage, is difficult to account for in detail. Hence, a Swift–Voce (S–V) model was used to describe the full-range stress–strain behaviour of 7050-T7451 aluminium alloy under uniaxial-tension, tension-with-notch and pure-shear processes with a hybrid experimental-numerical framework. Since the S–V model is not able to describe accurately the behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy, a combined Swift and 4th degree polynomial (S-P4) model is proposed. Results indicate that the S–V model can successfully describe large-deformation behaviour of the 7050-T7451 aluminium alloy, and the S-P4 model can successfully describe that of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy based on careful designing process of the constitutive equation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Performance and Structural Safety for Petroleum Tubular Good Goods and Equipment Materials, Tubular Goods Research Institute of CNPC, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China

China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, People’s Republic of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0020-7683(91)90040-M10.1016/0020-7683(91)90040-M ↗
2. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00035-910.1016/S0749-6419(02)00035-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.12.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2008.12.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.07610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.076 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12206-018-0616-810.1007/s12206-018-0616-8 ↗
7. 10.1111/str.1226510.1111/str.12265 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11665-018-3566-510.1007/s11665-018-3566-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.03810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.038 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.00610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.006 ↗
11. 10.1111/ffe.1313410.1111/ffe.13134 ↗
12. Davidenkov W.W. · Proc. ASTM · 1946 · 46 · 1147
13. Bridgman P.W. · 1952 · 177
14. 10.1007/978-3-319-21765-9_910.1007/978-3-319-21765-9_9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.015 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11340-014-9900-410.1007/s11340-014-9900-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.11.02110.1016/j.msea.2011.11.021 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0927-0256(00)00128-210.1016/S0927-0256(00)00128-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.09.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2015.09.004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.005 ↗
22. Choudhary B.K. · Met. Sci. J. · 2001 · 17 · 223