Discontinuous cracking of TiN films on a steel substrate induced by an adhesive interlayer
Source abstract
Abstract
The basic mechanisms governing the process of cracking of single-layer brittle films have been extensively explored through both simulations and experiments. However, the role that an adhesive interlayer plays in the cracking of the overlying brittle film remains unclear. By performing three-point bending experiments, we observed that the insertion of a 100 nm thick Ti interlayer changed the cracking behaviour of TiN films from a continuous pattern to a discontinuous pattern. The slight change in the microstructure of the film and the increase in film thickness arising from the addition of the Ti interlayer are unlikely to cause the observed cracking morphology. The combination of the different interface between the Ti and the steel substrate and the fracture of the Ti interlayer are responsible for the transition in the TiN film cracking morphologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Materials Physics and Chemistry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Corrosion and Protection Center, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.03.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.03.009 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.12310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.123 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.03210.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.032 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11661-009-9988-910.1007/s11661-009-9988-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.02610.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.09310.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.093 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.02310.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.023 ↗
8. 10.1557/jmr.2009.025210.1557/jmr.2009.0252 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.02710.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.027 ↗
10. Lu N. · Appl. Phys. Lett · 2007 · 91 · 2219091
11. Xiang Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett · 2005 · 87 · 1619101
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.04710.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.047 ↗
13. 10.3139/146.11051310.3139/146.110513 ↗
14. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90120-X10.1016/0001-6160(89)90120-X ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.01510.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.015 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00669-610.1016/S0257-8972(99)00669-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.02510.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.025 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.00510.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.09.00510.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.09.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.01210.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.012 ↗
21. Kim E.-H. · J. Appl. Phys · 2012 · 111 · 0935051
22. 10.1080/14786435.2015.113201810.1080/14786435.2015.1132018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.05910.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.059 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.5b0472710.1021/acsami.5b04727 ↗
25. 10.1080/14786435.2012.72314510.1080/14786435.2012.723145 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.06010.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.060 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.05.02110.1016/j.tsf.2015.05.021 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.01610.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.016 ↗