Molecular dynamics simulation of the growth and diffusion mechanisms of Fe–Cu bimetallic nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
In accordance with the molecular dynamic simulation and nudged elastic band method, the surface diffusion and growth of Fe–Cu nanoparticles were studied, respectively, using Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator code. Results showed that a single Cu adatom diffused on the surface of the Fe substrate mainly via the hopping mechanism and nearly did not exchange with the substrate atoms. In the Cu substrate, when interfacet diffusion of a Fe adatom on the surface was activated, the system energy evidently decreased after the exchange mechanism was chosen. At low temperatures, the metastable core–shell structure of FeshellCucore nanoparticles was obtained by simulating the deposition of Fe on Cu substrate. For the growth of Cu on Fe substrate, FecoreCushell nanoparticles could be formed and they gradually evolved into Wulff-like structures with depositing Cu atoms. The Monte Carlo calculation further showed that the stable configuration of Fe–Cu nanoparticles is FecoreCushell when the concentration of Cu atoms is small. With the increase of Cu atomic ratio (enough to cover the surface), the quasi-Janus was the stable structure in Fe–Cu nanoparticles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computational Science and Electronics, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, People’s Republic of China
College of Physics, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jishou University, Jishou, People’s Republic of China
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Vehicle Power and Transmission Systems, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20180439410.1002/adma.201804394 ↗
2. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0188710.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01887 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.16410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.164 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.molcata.2007.02.04510.1016/j.molcata.2007.02.045 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.03.02610.1016/j.wear.2006.03.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.21810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.218 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.11310.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.113 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.00610.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.02110.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.021 ↗
10. Xue J. · Adv. Mat. Res. · 2010 · 177 · 673
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/39/39560210.1088/0957-4484/22/39/395602 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0102410.1021/acsnano.6b01024 ↗
13. 10.1021/es020684610.1021/es0206846 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11356-013-1651-810.1007/s11356-013-1651-8 ↗
15. 10.1021/es048991u10.1021/es048991u ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.02910.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.029 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11671-008-9174-910.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.00510.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.05110.1016/j.desal.2011.03.051 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.00210.1016/j.watres.2012.10.002 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.472383210.1063/1.4723832 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.05910.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.059 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.00110.1016/j.watres.2014.08.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.062 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.02.02410.1016/j.matlet.2013.02.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.07.00210.1016/j.pnsc.2014.07.002 ↗
27. 10.1021/cr040090g10.1021/cr040090g ↗
28. Vernieres J. · Adv. Sci. · 2019 · 1900447
29. 10.1016/j.infrared.2007.07.00110.1016/j.infrared.2007.07.001 ↗
30. 10.1021/la970909410.1021/la9709094 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.12.06010.1016/j.jallcom.2005.12.060 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.09810.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.098 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12274-012-0276-410.1007/s12274-012-0276-4 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4CP06012A10.1039/C4CP06012A ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11886110.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118861 ↗
36. Ferrando R. · Springer · 2012 · 259
37. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.022 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.physb.2014.11.08710.1016/j.physb.2014.11.087 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8NR08889F10.1039/C8NR08889F ↗
40. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/39/39500410.1088/0953-8984/23/39/395004 ↗
41. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRev.159.9810.1103/PhysRev.159.98 ↗
43. 10.1080/1478643090329982410.1080/14786430903299824 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp906366k10.1021/jp906366k ↗
45. 10.1016/j.susc.2012.02.01710.1016/j.susc.2012.02.017 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X10.1016/S0039-6028(98)00363-X ↗
47. 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90442-310.1016/0039-6028(77)90442-3 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.261110.1103/PhysRevB.48.2611 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.169911410.1063/1.1699114 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.03210.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.032 ↗
53. 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00083-610.1016/0370-1573(95)00083-6 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.172678710.1063/1.1726787 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15540810.1103/PhysRevB.63.155408 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.04410.1016/j.tsf.2010.01.044 ↗
57. 10.1002/smll.20080116910.1002/smll.200801169 ↗
58. 10.1002/smll.20100113810.1002/smll.201001138 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.15542010.1103/PhysRevB.66.155420 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.05.04410.1016/j.susc.2004.05.044 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.18420510.1103/PhysRevB.71.184205 ↗
62. 10.1080/0141861970820719810.1080/01418619708207198 ↗
63. 10.7498/aps.70.2021033610.7498/aps.70.20210336 ↗