journal article·2006-10Open access

Imperfections in focal conic domains: the role of dislocations

M. Kleman, C. Meyer, Yu. A. Nastishin

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 86· Issue 28

Abstract

It is usual to think of focal conic domains (FCDs) as perfect geometric constructions in which the layers are folded into Dupin cyclides about an ellipse and a hyperbola that are conjugate. This ideal picture is often far from reality. We have investigated in detail the FCDs in several materials that have a transition from a smectic A (SmA) to a nematic phase (N). The ellipse and the hyperbola are seldom perfect, and the FCD textures also suffer large transformations (in shape and/or in nature) when approaching the transition to the nematic phase, or appear imperfect on cooling from the nematic phase. We interpret these imperfections as due to the interaction of FCDs with dislocations. We analyze theoretically the general principles subtending the interaction mechanisms between FCDs and finite Burgers vector dislocations, namely the formation of kinks on disclinations, to which dislocations are attached, and we present models relating to some experimental results. Whereas the principles of the interactions are very general, their realizations can differ widely in function of the boundary conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Liquid Crystal Research Advancements · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Nonlinear Photonic Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1542140059095532510.1080/15421400590955325 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.248010.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2480 ↗
4. 10.1140/epje/i2004-10004-610.1140/epje/i2004-10004-6 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.556610.1103/PhysRevE.56.5566 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.364210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3642 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.05170610.1103/PhysRevE.66.051706 ↗
8. Friedel G · Bull. Soc. Fr. Minér. · 1910 · 33 · 192
9. Friedel G · Ann. Phys. (Paris) · 1922 · 18 · 273
10. Kleman M · 200310.1007/b97416 ↗
11. Williams CE · 1976
12. 10.1051/jp2:199111310.1051/jp2:1991113 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.157410.1103/PhysRevE.61.1574 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R174310.1103/PhysRevA.46.R1743 ↗
15. 10.1080/1478643750821995610.1080/14786437508219956 ↗
16. Kleman M · 2004 · 12
17. Darboux G · 1914
18. 10.1007/s10189005003910.1007/s101890050039 ↗
19. Bourdon L · J. Phys., Paris · 1982 · 43 · 7710.1051/jphys:0198200430107700 ↗
20. 10.1051/jp2:199113010.1051/jp2:1991130 ↗
21. 10.1039/df958250001910.1039/df9582500019 ↗
22. Friedel J · J. Phys. Paris · 1969 · 30 · 43
23. Kroener E · 1981
24. 10.1080/1478643760822110810.1080/14786437608221108 ↗
25. 10.1080/0026894850807946910.1080/00268948508079469 ↗
26. 10.1209/0295-5075/2/8/00510.1209/0295-5075/2/8/005 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10189007000810.1007/s101890070008 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.36310.1103/PhysRevB.24.363 ↗
29. Toner J · J. Phys. Rev · 1982 · 26 · 1
30. Helfrich W · Phys. Paris · 1978 · 39 · 1199