journal article·2019-05-19Open access

Site stability and pipe diffusion of hydrogen under localised shear in aluminium

Y. Wang, D. Connétable, D. Tanguy

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 99· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of a plastic shear on the tetrahedral vs. octahedral site stability for hydrogen, in aluminium. Based on Density Functional Theory calculations, it is shown that the tetrahedral site remains the most stable site. It transforms into the octahedral site of the local hexagonal compact structure of the intrinsic stacking fault. The imperfect stacking is slightly attractive with respect to a regular lattice site. It is also shown that the shearing process involves a significant decrease of the energetic barrier for hydrogen jumps, at half the value of the Shockley partial Burgers vector, but not in the intrinsic stacking fault. These jumps involve a displacement component perpendicular to the shearing direction which favours an enhancement of hydrogen diffusion along edge dislocation cores (pipe diffusion). The magnitude of the boost in the jump rate in the direction of the dislocation line, according to Transition State Theory and taking into account the zero point energy correction, is of the order of a factor 50, at room temperature. First Passage Time Analysis is used to evaluate the effect on diffusion which is significant, by only at the nanoscale. Indeed, the common dislocation densities are too small for these effects (trapping, or pipe diffusion) to have a signature at the macroscopic level. The observed drop of the effective diffusion coefficient could therefore be attributed to the production of debris during plastic straining, as proposed in the literature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut Lumière Matière, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

CIRIMAT UMR 5085, CNRS-INPT-UPS, École Nationale d'Ingénieurs en Arts Chimiques et Technologiques (ENSIACET) 4, Toulouse Cedex 4, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11661-015-2836-110.1007/s11661-015-2836-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.04010.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.040 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00011-X10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00011-X ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.01610.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.04210.1016/j.actamat.2015.11.042 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.06510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.065 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00064-710.1016/S0022-5096(98)00064-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/0022-5096(89)90002-110.1016/0022-5096(89)90002-1 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.02550410.1103/PhysRevLett.113.025504 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.03110.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.031 ↗
11. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90125-610.1016/0001-6160(83)90125-6 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11661-012-1359-210.1007/s11661-012-1359-2 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.10410910.1103/PhysRevB.88.104109 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.06010110.1103/PhysRevB.86.060101 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.422110.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4221 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.06410210.1103/PhysRevB.65.064102 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-210.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.10410310.1103/PhysRevB.84.104103 ↗
19. 10.1080/14786435.2012.65770410.1080/14786435.2012.657704 ↗
20. 10.1080/1478643680822750010.1080/14786436808227500 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.771010.1103/PhysRevB.47.7710 ↗
22. 10.1080/14786435.2014.91033310.1080/14786435.2014.910333 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.14410910.1103/PhysRevB.69.144109 ↗
30. Jónsson H. · 1998
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.18411010.1103/PhysRevB.80.184110 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00333-410.1016/S1359-6454(98)00333-4 ↗
33. 10.1088/0965-0393/24/3/03500810.1088/0965-0393/24/3/035008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.00810.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.008 ↗
35. 10.1080/0141861970821401410.1080/01418619708214014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.05410.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.054 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0081-1947(04)80004-310.1016/S0081-1947(04)80004-3 ↗
38. 10.1080/02670836.2017.134201510.1080/02670836.2017.1342015 ↗
39. Hirth J.P. · 1992
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.01810.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.018 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.14410710.1103/PhysRevB.87.144107 ↗
42. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-086810.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0868 ↗
43. 10.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-710.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-7 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.336962710.1063/1.3369627 ↗
45. 10.1016/0001-6160(80)90038-310.1016/0001-6160(80)90038-3 ↗
46. Tanguy D. · Corrosion · 2016 · 72 · 297
47. 10.1007/BF0034997410.1007/BF00349974 ↗