journal article·2026-01-17Open access

Phase diagram determination using machine learning methods in materials science and engineering: a review

Abhishek Kumar Thakur, Sanyam Nitin Totade, Krishna Muralidharan, Monojit Dutta

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 106· Issue 2

Abstract

Machine learning methods are widely applied in various areas of materials science and engineering. They prove to be a powerful framework for understanding structure–property relationships and aid in discovering novel materials. In this review, we address various machine learning approaches used to determine the phase diagram of different material systems. We provide a detailed discussion on data generation methods, preprocessing, and common data operations that are essential for model development. We examine unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods, along with their training, testing, and validation processes. Furthermore, we highlight the challenges in phase diagram calculation and propose potential solutions. Finally, we discuss the applications of different machine learning methods in constructing phase and transformation diagrams.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tata Steel Limited

University of Arizona

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/C2009-0-11091-710.1016/C2009-0-11091-7 ↗
2. N. Saunders and A.P. Miodownik, CALPHAD (Calculation of Phase Diagrams): A Comprehensive Guide, Vol. 1, Elsevier, 1998.
3. 10.1016/S0079-6425(03)00025-210.1016/S0079-6425(03)00025-2 ↗
4. 10.1002/bbpc.1989093061510.1002/bbpc.19890930615 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-012-6424-010.1007/s10853-012-6424-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)80006-210.1016/S0364-5916(02)80006-2 ↗
7. 10.1002/inf2.1202810.1002/inf2.12028 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11669-023-01055-x10.1007/s11669-023-01055-x ↗
9. 10.1016/J.SSCI.2019.09.01510.1016/J.SSCI.2019.09.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/J.RESS.2021.10753010.1016/J.RESS.2021.107530 ↗
11. 10.3389/fbuil.2022.81146010.3389/fbuil.2022.811460 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.MICPRO.2020.10361310.1016/J.MICPRO.2020.103613 ↗
13. 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2021.10230310.1016/J.CALPHAD.2021.102303 ↗
14. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2022.11049710.1016/J.MATDES.2022.110497 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.501766110.1063/1.5017661 ↗
16. 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2020.11022410.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2020.110224 ↗
17. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2022.11834110.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2022.118341 ↗
18. 10.1039/D2MA00524G10.1039/D2MA00524G ↗
19. 10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
20. J. Malcolm and W. Chase, NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Fourth Edition, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1998, New York : American Institute of Physics for the National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999842910902121.
21. 10.1016/0009-3084(92)90002-710.1016/0009-3084(92)90002-7 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
24. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
25. 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2012.02.00510.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2012.02.005 ↗
26. 10.2138/am-2003-040910.2138/am-2003-0409 ↗
27. 10.3847/2041-8213/ab420610.3847/2041-8213/ab4206 ↗
28. 10.1016/J.CORSCI.2020.10892610.1016/J.CORSCI.2020.108926 ↗
29. 10.1088/1361-651X/ac3a1610.1088/1361-651X/ac3a16 ↗
30. 10.1016/J.CALPHAD.2013.10.00310.1016/J.CALPHAD.2013.10.003 ↗
31. 10.1145/344469010.1145/3444690 ↗
32. 10.1049/2024/882189110.1049/2024/8821891 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11669-020-00843-z10.1007/s11669-020-00843-z ↗
34. A.R.G. Brown and K.S. Jepson, Métallurgie physique et charactéristiques mécaniques des alliages titane-niobium. Mem. Etud. Sci. Rev. Met. 63 (1966), pp. 575–584.
35. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90068-X10.1016/0001-6160(66)90068-X ↗
36. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00041-510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00041-5 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-011-5612-710.1007/s10853-011-5612-7 ↗
38. 10.1002/mgea.7710.1002/mgea.77 ↗
39. 10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
40. 10.1007/s40192-021-00205-810.1007/s40192-021-00205-8 ↗
41. 10.3390/met1110165010.3390/met11101650 ↗
42. 10.1063/5.008878410.1063/5.0088784 ↗
43. 10.1002/sam.1003110.1002/sam.10031 ↗
44. 10.1007/s40069-013-0059-710.1007/s40069-013-0059-7 ↗
45. 10.1109/JSEN.2012.219530810.1109/JSEN.2012.2195308 ↗
46. 10.1080/15732479.2020.178551210.1080/15732479.2020.1785512 ↗
47. 10.20544/HORIZONS.B.04.1.17.P0510.20544/HORIZONS.B.04.1.17.P05 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10853-023-08343-410.1007/s10853-023-08343-4 ↗
49. 10.5604/01.3001.0012.694410.5604/01.3001.0012.6944 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11067110.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110671 ↗
51. 10.1108/EC-04-2019-015110.1108/EC-04-2019-0151 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10994-019-05855-610.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.03710.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.037 ↗
54. A. Paszke, S. Gross, F. Massa, A. Lerer, J. Bradbury, G. Chanan, T. Killeen, Z. Lin, N. Gimelshein, L. Antiga, A. Desmaison, A. Köpf, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, M. Raison, A. Tejani, S. Chilamkurthy, B. Steiner, L. Fang, J. Bai, and S. Chintala, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019), pp. 8024–8035.
55. A. Martín A. Ashish B. Paul B. Eugene C. Zhifeng C. Craig C. Greg S D. Andy D. Jeffrey D. Matthieu G. Sanjay G. Ian H. Andrew I. Geoffrey I. Michael Y. Jia J. Rafal K. Lukasz K. Manjunath L. Josh M. Dandelion M. Rajat M. Sherry M. Derek O. Chris S. Mike S. Jonathon S. Benoit S. Ilya T. Kunal T. Paul V. Vincent V. Vijay V. Fernanda V. Oriol W. Pete W. Martin W. Martin Y. Yuan and Z. Xiaoqiang. {TensorFlow}: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems (2015). https://www.tensorflow.org/.
56. 10.1016/J.COR.2004.03.01910.1016/J.COR.2004.03.019 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRev.81.98810.1103/PhysRev.81.988 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
59. 10.1016/J.PROCS.2016.07.11110.1016/J.PROCS.2016.07.111 ↗
60. 10.1016/J.ESWA.2024.12366710.1016/J.ESWA.2024.123667 ↗
61. 10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/02202210.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022 ↗
62. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
63. 10.1109/LGRS.2015.251375410.1109/LGRS.2015.2513754 ↗
64. 10.1109/SSCI.2018.862874210.1109/SSCI.2018.8628742 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.01335410.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013354 ↗
66. A. Nguyen J. Clune Y. Bengio A. Dosovitskiy and J. Yosinski. Plug & play generative networks: conditional iterative generation of images in latent space (2016).10.1109/CVPR.2017.374 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41524-020-00392-610.1038/s41524-020-00392-6 ↗
68. 10.1007/s00500-019-04094-010.1007/s00500-019-04094-0 ↗
69. 10.1007/978-981-16-5120-5_5810.1007/978-981-16-5120-5_58 ↗
70. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970130)16:2<189::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970130)16:2<189::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
71. 10.1186/s40537-019-0197-010.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
72. 10.1613/jair.95310.1613/jair.953 ↗
73. 10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2021.11433510.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2021.114335 ↗
74. 10.1080/27660400.2022.207654810.1080/27660400.2022.2076548 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.17410410.1103/PhysRevB.100.174104 ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0125410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01254 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.11380210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.113802 ↗
78. 10.1038/s41524-020-00477-210.1038/s41524-020-00477-2 ↗
79. 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c0035510.1021/acs.iecr.2c00355 ↗
80. 10.1080/1042691080261223910.1080/10426910802612239 ↗
81. 10.1088/1757-899X/346/1/01206710.1088/1757-899X/346/1/012067 ↗
82. 10.1007/s42243-023-00932-610.1007/s42243-023-00932-6 ↗
83. 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2020.15369410.1016/J.JALLCOM.2020.153694 ↗
84. 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2019.10923510.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2019.109235 ↗
85. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.13442210.1103/PhysRevB.103.134422 ↗
86. 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2020.04.10610.1016/J.PROCIR.2020.04.106 ↗
87. 10.1063/5.016685810.1063/5.0166858 ↗
88. 10.1038/s41467-022-30820-810.1038/s41467-022-30820-8 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.01410.1016/j.cpc.2019.04.014 ↗
90. 10.1016/J.CPC.2016.05.01010.1016/J.CPC.2016.05.010 ↗
91. A. Singraber mpbircher S. Reeve D.W.H. Swenson and J. Lauret. philippedavid CompPhysVienna/n2p2: Version 2.1.4 (2021).
92. 10.1016/J.CPC.2020.10767910.1016/J.CPC.2020.107679 ↗
93. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.01411210.1103/PhysRevB.96.014112 ↗
94. 10.1038/s41524-020-0323-810.1038/s41524-020-0323-8 ↗
95. 10.1063/1.355371710.1063/1.3553717 ↗
96. J. Roberts B. Rijal S. Divilov J.-P. Maria W.G. Fahrenholtz D.E. Wolfe D.W. Brenner S. Curtarolo and E. Zurek. Machine learned interatomic potentials for ternary carbides trained on the AFLOW database ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv2401.01852. (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01852.10.1038/s41524-024-01321-7 ↗
97. 10.1038/s41467-020-18788-910.1038/s41467-020-18788-9 ↗
98. 10.1080/03019233.2023.220426710.1080/03019233.2023.2204267 ↗
99. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2025.12074710.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2025.120747 ↗
100. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2024.12013710.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2024.120137 ↗