The effect of the location of stage-I fatigue crack across the persistent slip band on its growth rate – A 3D dislocation dynamics study
Source abstract
Abstract
A 3D dislocation dynamics study to ascertain the probable path of stage-I fatigue crack propagation across the persistent slip band (PSB) in austenitic stainless steel is presented. Cyclic plasticity and the resulting crack tip slip displacement (CTSD) are evaluated for cracks of varying length introduced at PSB-center and at two PSB-matrix interfaces. CTSD attains high value at either of the two interfaces irrespective of the proximity of crack front to the grain boundary. Further, a difference in microcrack propagation rate is also observed among the two interfaces. The present results assert microcrack propagation preferrentially along one of the two PSB-matrix interfaces rather than at the PSB-center. A pre-existing PSB dislocation structure localises the cyclic slip for crack lengths up to approximately half of the grain depth for an applied strain range of 2 × 10−4.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Metallurgy Division, Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam, India
Laboratory SYMME, Université Savoie, Mont Blanc, Annecy, France
DEN-Service de Recherches Métallurgiques Appliquées, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.05.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90217-410.1016/0001-6160(89)90217-4 ↗
3. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00574.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00574.x ↗
4. 10.1080/0141861010821435810.1080/01418610108214358 ↗
5. 10.1080/1478643090291761610.1080/14786430902917616 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478643090291762410.1080/14786430902917624 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0264688110.1007/BF02646881 ↗
8. 10.1080/14786435.2014.97883010.1080/14786435.2014.978830 ↗
9. 10.1088/0965-0393/6/6/00710.1088/0965-0393/6/6/007 ↗
10. 10.1080/1478643041000169005110.1080/14786430410001690051 ↗
11. 10.1080/1478643050034125010.1080/14786430500341250 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01201-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01201-1 ↗
13. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
14. 10.1080/0141861850823756210.1080/01418618508237562 ↗
15. 10.1080/14786435.2014.94932610.1080/14786435.2014.949326 ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.27810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.278 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00839.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00839.x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.01410.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.014 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.018 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.07.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00366-210.1016/S1359-6454(97)00366-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.02110.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.021 ↗
23. 10.1080/0141861880820449610.1080/01418618808204496 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.019 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11661-016-3374-110.1007/s11661-016-3374-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.01610.1016/j.msea.2016.02.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/0025-5416(87)90157-110.1016/0025-5416(87)90157-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.00510.1016/j.msea.2013.12.005 ↗