New dislocation velocity-based rate equation for thermally activated flow in face-centered cubic metals
Source abstract
Abstract
In the classic strain-rate equation for thermally activated dislocation intersection, the applied shear stress, τ, was introduced into the probability of thermal activation in response to the imposed shear strain rate, γ˙. The chemical model assumed that the pre-exponential term was comprised of the total number of activation sites times the frequency of attempts. The formulation did not explicitly address the experimental insensitivity of flow stress, σ, to strain-rate magnitude, ε˙. Devolution of the pre-exponential term indicates that the change in magnitude response is in the frequency term. The +rate of doing work, τγ˙ and in turn γ˙ must arise from the operative velocity of dislocation segments. The modified strain-rate relation becomes γ˙=B0(τm∗+2)γ0e−(ΔGo−τνkT), analogous to Orowan, wherein B0 converts dislocation velocity to stress, γ0 is the number of sites times incremental strain areasΔν,G0 is free energy change due to dislocation intersection, ν, is activation volume, and kT is thermal energy. Constant strain rate is maintained by the decrease of m*, and the integral strain rate sensitivity, minteg, slope of log(σ-σ0) versus log(ε˙)|T, where σ0 is a yield stress, may increase with strain whereas the differential one, mdif = ∂ln(σ-σ0)/∂ln(ε˙)|T, remains constant, because change in τν is equally offset by change in ΔG0. The correlation of m* to mdif shows that the experimentally determined activation volume is twice the theoretical one, meaning the pre-exponential term is proportional to the strain rate. Moreover, the derivation of m* as a function of τ predicts a linear relation of log(υ) to log(τ) as validated by experiment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Queen's University
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Glasstone, K.J. Laidler, and H. Eyring, The Theory of Rate Processes, McGraw Hill, New York and London, 1941.
2. 10.1002/pssb.1965008020910.1002/pssb.19650080209 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478643700822094010.1080/14786437008220940 ↗
4. 10.1002/pssb.222010021210.1002/pssb.2220100212 ↗
5. 10.1016/0025-5416(69)90026-310.1016/0025-5416(69)90026-3 ↗
6. U.F. Kocks, A.S. Argon, and M.F. Ashby, Thermodynamics and kinetics of slip, Prog. Mater. Sci. 19 (1975), pp. 1–281.
7. 10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00007-310.1016/S0079-6425(98)00007-3 ↗
8. S. Saimoto, H. Sang, and L.R. Morris, Microplastic bases for constitutive relations found in tensile testing, Acta Metall. 29 (1981), pp. 215–228.10.1016/0001-6160(81)90101-2 ↗
9. 10.3390/cryst1212181110.3390/cryst12121811 ↗
10. 10.1080/0141861010821444810.1080/01418610108214448 ↗
11. 10.1038/s43246-020-00090-210.1038/s43246-020-00090-2 ↗
12. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90030-210.1016/0001-6160(88)90030-2 ↗
13. 10.1088/0959-5309/52/1/30310.1088/0959-5309/52/1/303 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11661-025-07693-910.1007/s11661-025-07693-9 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40192-024-00379-x10.1007/s40192-024-00379-x ↗
16. 10.1080/1478643050036734710.1080/14786430500367347 ↗
17. 10.1139/p67-04310.1139/p67-043 ↗
18. S. Saimoto. Eyring rate equation applied to thermally activated plastic flow in metals: Theory and experiment to be published.
19. T. Vreeland, Jr., Dislocation velocity in copper and zinc, in Dislocation Dynamics, A.R. Rosenfield, G.T. Hahn, A.L. Bennet, and R.I. Jaffee, eds., McGraw-Hill, NY, 1968. pp. 529–546.
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.044">10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.04410.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.044">10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.044 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.01410.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.014 ↗
22. 10.1080/0141861020823568410.1080/01418610208235684 ↗
23. 10.17863/CAM.3811210.17863/CAM.38112 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10511510.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105115 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.02910.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.029 ↗
26. 10.1080/1478643060056772110.1080/14786430600567721 ↗
27. 10.1016/0001-6160(53)90022-410.1016/0001-6160(53)90022-4 ↗
28. 10.1080/1478643590823341210.1080/14786435908233412 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116597">10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.11659710.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116597">10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116597 ↗
30. 10.1016/0001-6160(83)90133-510.1016/0001-6160(83)90133-5 ↗
31. S. Saimoto and P. Van Houtte, Constitutive relation based on Taylor slip analysis to replicate work-hardening evolution, Acta Mater. 59 (2011), pp. 602–612.10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.065 ↗
32. S. Saimoto, M. Moradi, and B.J. Diak, Penultimate word on stage II strain hardening in face-centered cubic metals?, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 944 (2025), 148911.10.1016/j.msea.2025.148911 ↗