journal article·2024-02

Gas in external fields: the weird case of the logarithmic trap

Loris Ferrari

Philosophical Magazine· Volume 104· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of an attractive logarithmic potential u(r)=u0ln⁡(r/r0) (u0>0 being the trap strength and r0 an arbitrary length scale) on a gas of N non interacting particles (Bosons or Fermions), in a box of volume VD, are studied in D = 2, 3 dimensions. The unconventional behaviour of the gas challenges the current notions of thermodynamic limit and size independence. When VD and N diverge, with finite density N/VD<∞ and finite u0, the gas collapses in the ground state, independently from the bosonic/fermionic nature of the particles, at any temperature. If, instead, N/VD→0, there exists a critical temperature Tc, such that the gas remains in the ground state at any T<Tc, and ‘evaporates’ above, in a non-equilibrium state of borderless diffusion. For the gas to exhibit a conventional Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) or a finite Fermi level, the strength u0 must vanish with VD→∞, according to a complicated exponential relationship, as a consequence of the exponentially increasing density of states, specific of the logarithmic trap.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.133610.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1336 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R2210.1103/PhysRevA.51.R22 ↗
3. 10.1209/epl/i1996-00234-210.1209/epl/i1996-00234-2 ↗
4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.79.23510.1103/RevModPhys.79.235 ↗
5. 10.1119/1.481916710.1119/1.4819167 ↗
6. 10.1590/S0103-9733200500040000410.1590/S0103-97332005000400004 ↗
7. 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.72110.1103/RevModPhys.70.721 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.396910.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3969 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.168710.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1687 ↗
10. 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-020-00090-810.1140/epjqt/s40507-020-00090-8 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.09360210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.093602 ↗
12. O. Carraz C. Siemes L. Massotti R. Hiagmans and P. Silvestrin A spaceborn gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring Eath's gravity field. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1406.0765v2 [phys-atom-ph] (2014).10.1007/s12217-014-9385-x ↗
13. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf7b510.1088/1367-2630/aaf7b5 ↗
14. T. Bravo D. Rätzel and I. Fuentes Phononic gravity gradiometry with Bose–Einstein condensates. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10104v2 [quant-phis] (2020).
15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.35.435410.1103/PhysRevA.35.4354 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.05360610.1103/PhysRevA.65.053606 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.172924810.1063/1.1729248 ↗
18. 10.1143/PTP.41.47310.1143/PTP.41.473 ↗
19. Y. Muraki, K. Mori, and N. Nakagawa, Logarithmic mass formula for elementary particles and a new quantum number, N. Cim. 23 (1978), pp. 27–31.
20. K. Paasch, The logarithmic potential and an exponential mass function for elementary particles, Prog. Phys. 1 (2009), pp. 36–39.
21. 10.1007/s10955-011-0363-z10.1007/s10955-011-0363-z ↗
22. 10.1063/1.500038610.1063/1.5000386 ↗
23. 10.1051/jp1:199223810.1051/jp1:1992238 ↗
24. E. Aghion, D.A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, From non-normalizable Boltzmann statistics to infinite-ergodic theory, Phiys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019), pp. 01601.
25. 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.10989010.1016/j.chaos.2020.109890 ↗
26. 10.1093/mnras/sty216510.1093/mnras/sty2165 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3735/22/7/00510.1088/0022-3735/22/7/005 ↗
28. 10.1016/0042-207X(84)90324-510.1016/0042-207X(84)90324-5 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.167215710.1063/1.1672157 ↗
30. 10.1119/1.1904810.1119/1.19048 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.11601710.1103/PhysRevD.102.116017 ↗
32. Supplemental Materials: Section A.
33. Supplemental Materials: Section B.
34. 10.1119/1.1859110.1119/1.18591 ↗
35. 10.1088/0143-0807/32/6/00910.1088/0143-0807/32/6/009 ↗
36. Use for example Wolfram Mathematica 7.01.0 or higher versions.
37. Supplemental Materials: Section C.
38. Supplemental Materials: Section D.
39. H. Ciftci E. Ateser and H. Koru The power-law and the logarithmic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv: math-ph/0212072v1. 2002 pp. 1–16.
40. A.K. Roy Calculation of the bound states of power-law and logarithmic potentials through a generalized pseudopotential method. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1307.1525v1 [quant-ph]. 2013 pp. 1–14.
41. A.A. Abdel-Hardy, Calculation of the power-law and logarithmic potential using the J-matrix method, Int. J. App. Sc. IJBAS-IJENS 11 (2011), pp. 53–59.
42. 10.1126/science.285.543.170310.1126/science.285.543.1703 ↗