On the origins of the Finnis–Sinclair potentials
Source abstract
Abstract
I trace back the origins of the famous Finnis–Sinclair potentials. These potentials mimic the results of tight binding theory through their use of the square root embedding function. From the tentative beginnings of tight binding in the 1930s to 1984 or so, Bloch, Seitz, Montroll, Friedel, Cyrot-Lackmann and Ducastelle are some of the famous names involved, to name just a few. The application of the method of moments to the description of densities of states and its connection to the physics of closed paths linking nearest neighbours interacting atoms helped to formalise Friedel's rectangular band model for the d electrons in transition metals. Extension from perfectly periodic to defective structures could not be but a slow process due to the change of paradigm for solid state scientists and to the necessary caution to be paid to self-consistency. British scientists also contributed significantly in the 1980s. Computer progress and pragmatism helped to go from mainly analytical developments to numerical experiments (another change of paradigm). I also digress on various not so well-known historical points of interest to this story.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/9783527610327.ch210.1002/9783527610327.ch2 ↗
2. Allan G · 1981 · 3
3. Gaspard J-P · 1986 · 279
4. Gaspard J-P · 1986 · 441
5. Ducastelle F · 1991
6. Sutton A · 1993
7. Pettifor D · 199510.1093/oso/9780198517870.001.0001 ↗
8. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509776.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509776.001.0001 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRev.43.80410.1103/PhysRev.43.804 ↗
10. 10.1088/0959-5309/47/4/30510.1088/0959-5309/47/4/305 ↗
11. Fröhlich H · 1936
12. Mott NF · 1936
13. Seitz F · J. Appl. Phys. · 1937 · 8 · 84, 186
14. Wigner E · 1955 · 1 · 97
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.49.53710.1103/PhysRev.49.537 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRev.51.84610.1103/PhysRev.51.846 ↗
17. Philips JC · 1967 · 22
18. Friedel J · 1967 · 283
19. Mott, NF. Récents progrès et difficultés de la théorie électronique des métaux. Ferromagnétisme, International Conference on Magnetism. May1939, Strasbourg. Le magnétisme, Vol. II, pp.1Paris: CNRS-IICI. (with discussions)
20. Néel, L. Champs moléculaires, aimantation à saturation et constantes de Curie des éléments de transition et de leurs alliages. Le Magnétisme, Ferromagnétisme, International Conference on Magnetism. May1939, Strasbourg. Vol. II, pp.65Paris: CNRS-IICI. (with discussions)
21. Friedel J · Trans. Metall. Soc AIME · 1964 · 230 · 616
22. 10.1016/0022-3697(68)90216-310.1016/0022-3697(68)90216-3 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.172371010.1063/1.1723710 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0031-8914(58)93831-X10.1016/S0031-8914(58)93831-X ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRev.115.1810.1103/PhysRev.115.18 ↗
26. 10.1080/0001873670010149510.1080/00018736700101495 ↗
27. Barisic S · J. Phys. (Paris) · 1969 · 30 · 95510.1051/jphys:019690030011-12095500 ↗
28. Gschneider KA · 1964 · 16 · 275
29. Friedel J · 1969 · 340
30. Ducastelle F · J. Phys. (Paris) · 1970 · 31 · 105510.1051/jphys:019700031011-120105500 ↗
31. 10.1088/0305-4608/18/8/00210.1088/0305-4608/18/8/002 ↗
32. 10.1088/0022-3719/21/1/00710.1088/0022-3719/21/1/007 ↗
33. 10.1016/0022-3697(76)90008-110.1016/0022-3697(76)90008-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/0039-6028(73)90074-510.1016/0039-6028(73)90074-5 ↗
35. 10.1002/pssb.222074014410.1002/pssb.2220740144 ↗
36. 10.1016/0039-6028(79)90674-510.1016/0039-6028(79)90674-5 ↗
37. 10.1080/0141861810823954910.1080/01418618108239549 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.626510.1103/PhysRevB.23.6265 ↗
39. 10.1088/0022-3719/15/18/01510.1088/0022-3719/15/18/015 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.482210.1103/PhysRevB.30.4822 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.66510.1103/PhysRevB.28.665 ↗
42. 10.1080/0141861840824421010.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.128510.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1285 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
45. Parrinello M · Interview by Dónal Mac Kernan, Simu-Newsletter · 2000 · 2 · 5
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.71910.1103/PhysRevLett.57.719 ↗
47. 10.1080/0141861880820518410.1080/01418618808205184 ↗
48. 10.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U10.1016/0920-2307(93)90001-U ↗
49. Foiles SM · MRS Bull. · 1996 · 21 · 2410.1557/S0883769400046261 ↗
50. Friedel J · Phil. Mag. · 1952 · 43 · 15310.1080/14786440208561086 ↗
51. 10.1080/0141861870820448510.1080/01418618708204485 ↗
52. Pettifor, DG and Weaire, DL (eds.). The Recursion Method and its Applications. Proceedings, Imperial College London. September1984. Berlin: Springer.
53. Brezinski Cl · 199110.1007/978-3-642-58169-4 ↗
54. Mersenne M · 1634
55. Galilei, G. 1891.Le Mechaniche (Ravenna 1649), in Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, Vol. 2, 147Nazionale, Florence: Ediz.
56. Bienaymé IJ · J. Math. Pures Appl. Sér. I · 1852 · 17 · 33
57. Tchebychef P · J. Math. Pures Appl. · 1874 · 19 · 157
58. 10.1007/BF0133945510.1007/BF01339455 ↗
59. 10.1007/BF0133953010.1007/BF01339530 ↗
60. Mott NF · 1980
61. Hoddeson L · 1992 · 8810.1093/oso/9780195053296.003.0002 ↗
62. Pippard B · 1995 · 1279
63. Reitz JR · 1955 · 1 · 1
64. 10.1039/tf929250066810.1039/tf9292500668 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.174968310.1063/1.1749683 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRev.145.63710.1103/PhysRev.145.637 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRev.36.5710.1103/PhysRev.36.57 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRev.153.67310.1103/PhysRev.153.673 ↗
69. Harrison WA · 1980
70. Love AEH · 1892
71. 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.340910.1103/PhysRevB.32.3409 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
73. 10.1080/0141861890820506210.1080/01418618908205062 ↗
74. 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.109210.1103/PhysRevA.7.1092 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.171232810.1063/1.1712328 ↗
76. Duparc OBMHardouin · 1996 · 63
77. Duparc OBMHardouin · Int. J. Mater. Res. 100 · 2009 · 138210.3139/146.110193 ↗
78. 10.1017/S030500410000184510.1017/S0305004100001845 ↗
79. 10.1080/0001873540010123310.1080/00018735400101233 ↗