Effects of cooling rate on the microstructure and solute partitioning in near eutectoid Ti–Cu alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of cooling rate on eutectoid decomposition in a near eutectoid (Ti-5.5 at.% Cu) alloy has been investigated in a systematic manner by coupling scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography studies. Thus, the competition between nucleation and growth of proeutectoid α plates from pre-existing β grain boundaries, and eutectoid decomposition (α + Ti2Cu) via a pearlitic mechanism has been studied as a function of cooling rate, using a Jominy-end quenched sample that was cooled from the high-temperature single β phase. When the alloy was subjected to very fast cooling (160 K/s), proeutectoid α plates, supersaturated in Cu, are formed along with a highly refined lamellar eutectoid product between these α plates. In contrast, intermediate (9 K/s) and slow (2 K/s) cooling results in considerably coarser proeutectoid α plates as well as lamellar eutectoid products. With the decrease in the cooling rate, there was a substantial increase in the volume fraction of the lamellar eutectoid product and the composition of all decomposition products approached their equilibrium values. Also, the slowest cooled sample (2 K/s) exhibited substantially rougher and irregular interfaces between the proeutectoid α and the lamellar eutectoid product, which seems to promote the cooperative growth of lamellar α + Ti2Cu. Irrespective of the cooling rate, nucleation of the lamellar eutectoid (α + Ti2Cu) product appears to only occur at the interface between the proeutectoid α plates and the β matrix.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Lütjering G. · 2007
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.04010.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.040 ↗
3. 10.1007/BF0117404710.1007/BF01174047 ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0266194710.1007/BF02661947 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0264344410.1007/BF02643444 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0264758710.1007/BF02647587 ↗
7. 10.1016/0025-5416(88)90164-410.1016/0025-5416(88)90164-4 ↗
8. S. Banerjee and P. Mukhopadhyay,Phase Transformations: Examples from Titanium and Zirconium Alloys, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2004, p.670.
9. Jaffe R.I. · 1958 · 65
10. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.00710.1016/j.msec.2008.09.007 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661-011-0656-510.1007/s11661-011-0656-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.06610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.06.066 ↗
13. Baker H. · 1992
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.172-17410.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.172-174 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.00810.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.00710.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.007 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0265656110.1007/BF02656561 ↗
18. Hellman O.C. · Microsc. Microana. · 2000 · 6 · 43710.1007/S100050010051 ↗